Additional Comments on Flemming Rose’s Recent Article

Full text of the article here.

Let’s see what Mr. Rose has to say (my comments are in brackets):

“What’s wrong with Europe? For one thing, Europe’s approach to immigration and integration is rooted in its historic experience with relatively homogeneous cultures. In the United States one’s definition of nationality is essentially political [this is a flagrant misrepresentation of American history, when the Founding Fathers wrote “We the People…” in the preamble of the U.S. Constitution that presupposed a particular “people”. Were the Founding Fathers talking about Negro slaves? Chinamen? Red Indians? Who, Mr. Rose? First and foremost, White Anglo-Saxon Protestants like them, Mr. Rose.]; in Europe it is historically cultural. [But not racial, Mr. Rose?]”…But what about the dark, bearded new Danes who speak Arabic at home and poor Danish in the streets? We Europeans must make a profound cultural adjustment to understand that they, too, can be Danes.

…

“What to do? Obviously, we can never return to the comfortable monocultures of old. [And why not? Is immigration like a force of nature, a tornado that cannot be contained nor reversed? It is easy to say, “Repatriation is unthinkable, impossible … the racial pot has been stirred … the old world has gone … things can’t be undone, etc.” This is defeatism. Because the task is complex and hard it does not mean we should resign ourselves to the unacceptable. There is an ultimate interest at stake here. Flemming Rose’s defeatism serves only to sap the energy and will of Europeans to tackle the problem in the only effective manner: en masse repatriations.] A demographic revolution is changing the face, and look, of Europe. In an age of mass migration and the Internet, cheap air fares and cell phones everywhere, cultural pluralism is an irreversible fact, like it or not. A nostalgic longing for cultural purity—racial purity, religious purity—easily descends into ethnic cleansing.” [Why not mention Auschwitz and the gaz chamber while you’re hysterically at it, Mr. Rose? But ethnic cleansing is already well underway in Europe, Mr. Rose…it’s the indigenous, White Europeans who are being displaced and “cleansed” by the new invaders.]

…

“Equal treatment is the democratic way to overcome traditional barriers of blood and soil for newcomers. To me, that means treating immigrants just as I would any other Danes.”

…

“Maybe Europe needs to take a leaf—or a whole book—from the American experience. For a new Europe of many cultures that is somehow a single entity to emerge, as it has in the United States, will take effort from both sides—the native-born and the newly arrived.” [This is a totally romanticized and fictitious view of the American experience with immigration, promoted by American Zionists. Until the 1965 Immigration Act opened the flood-gates to coloured, Third World immigrants (in large measure thanks to incessant Jewish agitation on behalf of an “open-borders” policy), the United States was a consciously White country with a permanent and willfully disenfranchised Negro underclass.]

“At the same time, Europeans must show a willingness to jettison entrenched notions of blood and soil and accept people from foreign countries and cultures as just what they are, the new Europeans.” [Except that race and culture are inextricably linked, Mr. Rose. For example, it’s impossible to replace Swedes with Somalis and expect Sweden to remain Sweden in any real, meaningful sense, surely you must know that, Mr. Rose! The Swedish heart pumps Nordic blood, it’s impossible to alter that blood and retain eternal, Nordic Sweden.]