Jews Produced Holocau$t Pornography
January 27, 2007 on 12:05 pm | Friedrich Braun | Jewish Diaspora , Revisionism, The Jewish Question | | Email This Post | Print this PostAre Jews sick, twisted perverts and liars? Yup, sure, you bet! You already knew that, right? However, the lying shysters can always come up with something that will shock and stun even the most blasé and apathetic witness of Jewish depravity. The entire so-called holocau$t literture is fictitous garbage, internalized by both Jews and the goyim as “Truth,” and to dispute its version of events is to victimize the poor, lying kikes once again…if not to engage in a “hate crime.” In any case, one should keep in mind that filthy kikes and porn have a long and illustrious history (for examples of Jewish family values, see here and here and here.)
Fictitious memory
By Nirit Anderman
A few years ago, a book in a Tel Aviv used-book store caught the eye of documentary filmmaker Ari Libsker. The book, written in Hebrew, featured hard-core pornography, but what attracted his attention was its setting and the identity of its characters. The story tells of a Nazi prison camp commanded by women, and includes descriptions of their abuse of prisoners of war - some of them sexual.
That same bookstore visit sparked Libsker’s interest in “stalagim,” pornographic books published in Israel during the 1960s that describe sadistic relations between beautiful Nazi women, who commanded Third Reich prison camps, and their tortured prisoners. In these books, the prisoners are usually American and British, rather than Jewish. Libsker adds that in the books’ narratives, the protagonist is usually a prisoner who describes the humiliation, torture and rape he experiences in the camp.
His interest in this subject led Libsker to Eli Eshed, a researcher of popular Israeli culture and pulp literature, who examined the “stalag” phenomenon. In an article Eshed published in the Ha’ayal Hakoreh online publication in 2001, he cited dozens of titles belonging to this genre, which were released in Israel between 1961 and 1964. The first publication of the series, “Stalag 13,” was printed seven times and sold a total of 25,000 copies.
Not only did these books break taboos relating to pornography in Hebrew fiction - they broke taboos that had existed with regard to the literary treatment of the Holocaust, according to Eshed.
“It is no accident that ’stalagim’ began to appear in 1961, in the shadow of the Eichmann trial in Jerusalem,” Eshed writes. “The bitter and widely publicized testimony gave rise to a renewed public discourse on the Holocaust.”
It was the exposure to this literary genre that led to Libsker’s decision to make a documentary film to examine the phenomenon.
Filming, which began a year ago, mainly focuses on interviews with people who wrote these books under pseudonyms, and their readers. “The film will expose the inventor of this genre, who was interviewed for the first time,” Libsker says.
Two weeks ago, Libsker interviewed Uri Avnery, editor of the now defunct Haolam Hazeh weekly news magazine that devoted the back pages of two editions to “stalagim.” Avnery also referred to the Eichmann trial as a turning point in Israel’s approach to the Holocaust. He believes the “stalagim” developed as a sado-masochistic, public response to the horrors described in the trial.
“The film attempts to identify the backdrop to which this fiction was created, and the reason it became so popular,” Libsker says. “It also examines how these books influenced the generation that read them - people now in their 50s and 60s - and how the books shaped their memory.” He maintains that for many “stalag” readers, the boundaries between fact and fiction became blurred. “Although these are fictional books, members of that generation absorbed the ’stalagim’ as part of the collective memory of the Holocaust,” he says.
Libsker says it was hard to find the books’ writers and to persuade them to grant interviews for the film. Readers were also reluctant to expose their reading habits on camera.
According to Libsker, many find the subject intimidating and some interviewees demanded that he conceal their identities on film. In some scenes, he asked readers to read passages from the books aloud, as he documented their responses to the text. He says many of them remembered the books as soft pornography and were surprised by the extremely graphic details of sexual abuse (that include the amputation of genitalia, for example).
The years that passed not only softened the memory of the pornographic details in the readers’ minds. According to Libsker, many switched the roles and sexes of the characters: Readers, who have matured since reading these books, often remember them as stories about Nazi men raping and torturing Jewish women, rather than the opposite.
The filming of the documentary, temporarily entitled “Stalagim,” will be completed in the coming days. Barak Heiman co-produced the movie with Libsker and the film was funded by the “Yes Doco” television channel and the New Fund for Film and Television in Israel.
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/817490.html
2 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
Powered by WordPress.
Entries and comments feeds.
Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^

I can never understand the theory that German women OR men indulged in something that they would find completely repulsive as raping Jews, male or female. Don’t the idiots who write these books know of the 1935 racial laws which prohibited this kind of debauchery?! Do the same fools not know that the German army had the lowest recorded number of confirmed rapes during the Great Fatherland Wars?
With nationalist greetings,
Dan
Comment by The Guardian — August 25, 2007 #
There are a few other good articles about this rather “sick” subject. The Jews are truly “apostles of culture” as a certain man once quipped back around…oh…say 1933.
Comment by Emma — December 2, 2007 #