Cioran on the Jews [1]

February 1, 2007 on 11:02 pm | Friedrich Braun | Books , Ethnicity and Ethnic Genetic Interests , Jewish Diaspora , The Jewish Question | | Email This Post | Print this Post

Isn’t it curious how throughout the ages the goyim have always made the same type of comments regarding the lovable and harmless kikes? I mean, we can go back 3000, 1000, 500, 10 years and have the host populations accuse the “plastic demon of decomposition” (Richard Wagner) of the exact same type of nefarious behaviour, detrimental to the host populations. Ladies & gentlemen let me say this again and again: the Jews are not normal people…let’s say it again for greater emphasis: THE JEWS ARE NOT NORMAL PEOPLE…they are not like you and I. And another thing, have you noticed how so many great men and women had some choice things to say about the Jews? We are always told in condemnatory tones how all those great and wise and learned and smart men and women were right about everything EXCEPT the Jews. Isn’t it odd? Have you ever wondered about that? It’s one of those things that makes you go “hmmm…” How can it be? I suggest to you, dear reader, that they were RIGHT about the Jews as well…

Let’s take the late great Romanian philosopher and aphorist E.M. Cioran as an example. Let’s hear him talk about the Jews:

Cioran’s chief complaint — that the Jews opposed all nationalism save their own — could also be found in Conta’s ‘The Jewish Question’….

…

The Jew is not our fellow man, our kind, and no matter how close we become, the chasm is still there, whether we like it or not. It is as if they were descended from a different breed of monkey than ourselves, condemned to a sterile tragedy, to hopes that always turn out to be false. It is at a human level that we cannot get close to them, for a Jew is first Jewish, and only then human.

…

Cioran’s premise is that contacts between Jews and non-Jews could only take the form of ‘contempt and hatred’; in any event, you cannot love them, he decided. Jews were defined by ‘vampirism’ and ‘aggressiveness’; a ‘hardworking people of exploiters’ using their ‘century-old…cynicism and experience’ to ‘exploit the peoples and nations they managed to infiltrate. They were a ‘nuisance,’ and after the First World War they had ‘invaded’ and paralysed Romania, using the ‘idiotic and degenerate’ representatives of the Romanian democratic regime to establish a system that allowed them to dominate the country….If Romanian Jewry were destroyed, he writes, it would be ‘reborn in all its Jewishness.’

…

In Romania…the ‘philo-Semitic’ political regime had supported their excessive development: ‘The Romanian democratic regime has worked only to protect the Jews and Jewish-Romanian capital.’ As a result, in the democratic state ‘the foreigners have gained amazing authority over the Romanians.’

…

[The Jews] had ‘inserted the materialist idea into socialism,’ thereby ‘contaminating’ the issue of collectivism. They supported internationalism and ‘common and artificial values’; communism appealed to them precisely because of its internationalism — ‘They projected in communism all the elements likely to justify and facilitate their peregrinations’ — and only secondarily because of its ideal of ’social justice.’

…

According to Cioran, the Jews must be blamed for something else: by achieving the transition ‘from socialist idealism to flat materialism,’ that is, to Marxism, the Jews had instituted a ‘minor Weltanschauung‘ as the core of Communist ideas. Were communism to be achieved, this view would never be able to ensure its survival, Cioran prophesizes.

[Bold emphasis added.]

[An Infamous Past: E.M. Cioran and the Rise of Fascism in Romanian at 125-128. To be continued.]

17 Comments »

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

  1. Marta Petru’s book on Cioran (from which these comments about Jews are taken) is an academic hatchet job focused on a book he published in the mid-1930’s entitled THE TRANSFIGURATION OF ROMANIA. It’s currently fashionable for Romanian scholars like Marta Petru (and Adriana Berger) to make their international academic “bones” on lurid exposes of the nationalist (Legionary) pasts of Romania’s great 20th century philosophers - E.M. Cioran, Mircea Eliade, Constantin Noica, Nae Ionescu etc. Cioran left Romania before WWII and remained in Paris where he was embraced by the French post-war Left (Sartre et al). This was accomplished by a volte face and public mea culpa over his youthful anti-Semitism. Susan Sontag even wrote an introduction to one collection of his translated existential pensees. He eschewed everything negative he’d ever written about Jews declaring it had been done out of a misplaced sense of spiritual envy. He never returned to Romania which became exactly the sort of “Judeo-Masonic” Bolshevist gulag he’d stood against in his youth.

    Comment by Charles Krafft — November 4, 2007 #

  2. “He never returned to Romania which became exactly the sort of “Judeo-Masonic” Bolshevist gulag he’d stood against in his youth.”

    Yes, absolute hypocrisy on Cioran’s part, never speaking out again about the Jewish-Soviet regime that dominated Romania post-WWII. However, I wouldn’t call them “Judeo-Masonic,” but rather Judaeo-Communist of course.

    But we must remember that he had a career to look after, a career in PUBLISHING nonetheless, and we all know who used to run that industry before the internet largely put them out of business. If he wanted to be published by ‘large and reputable’ (i.e. Jewish) presses and actually have a career in writing and publishing he of course had to repudiate antisemitism entirely to get on the payroll so to speak.

    In fact, Cioran was entirely correct — Romania was dominated economically by a tiny Jewish urban or semi-urban ethnic minority beginning in the 18th Century, and it reached its height in the early to mid-20th Century. Only the ‘antisemitic outburst’ of WWII temporarily broke the Jewish economic yoke, which was of course reinstalled (’legally and formally’ this time under by the Jewish Bolsheviks) when the Soviets took over in 1945.

    So, like much of the rest of Eastern Europe, history shows us that the economy of Romania was largely controlled by an hostile ethnic minority of Ashkenazim for a good 200 years, meaning many generations of White and Slavic Eastern Europeans have never known true economic freedom. Yes, a sad story indeed, and even more sad once one realizes that this same history occurred in much of the Ukraine, Belarus, Poland, Lithuania, Hungary, western Russia, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, etc etc.

    Comment by Zsidozas — April 25, 2008 #

  3. I realize I’m way late on this post, but please bear with me…

    The “plastic demon of decomposition” is a good one. Was that phrase originally found in “Das Judenthum in der Musik”?

    I recently came across “The Pestilential Miasma of the World” which I think is pretty good too. [http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/pesthauch.htm]

    “…in the democratic state ‘the foreigners have gained amazing authority over the Romanians.’ ”

    And again (and again, and again…) we see this hostile and rootless ethnic minority economically ruling over the ‘democratic’ ethnic and native majority. How democratic. Americans especially should take note of this historical pattern and figure out how it applies it to their current situation.

    Comment by Zsidozas — April 25, 2008 #

  4. Are you Romanian, Z.?

    Comment by Friedrich Braun — April 25, 2008 #

  5. If only. Romania is a nice country with many beautiful people, a recovering European culture (after being crushed for decades under the Soviet Jewish boot), and a beautiful language and literary culture as well. But nah, I’m stuck here in the American South, no Danube or opera houses around — just a lot of Wal-Marts and parking lots.

    God Bless The Jewnited States!

    Comment by Z — April 25, 2008 #

  6. I feel your pain.

    Comment by Friedrich Braun — April 25, 2008 #

  7. Yeah, just a few of the Jews in Romania were major figures and leaders in the Soviet installed Communist Party there…just a FEW…

    * Martin Abern, Trotskyist activist
    * Olga Bancic, communist activist
    * Silviu Brucan, communist politician
    * Simion Bughici, communist politician
    * Iosif Chişinevschi, communist politician
    * Alexandru Dobrogeanu-Gherea, communist activist
    * David Fabian, communist activist
    * Max Goldstein, communist activist
    * Remus Koffler, communist activist
    * David Korner, Trotskyist activist
    * Vasile Luca, communist politician
    * Gheorghe Gaston Marin, communist politician
    * Alexandru Nicolschi, communist politician
    * Saul Ozias, communist politician
    * Ana Pauker, communist politician
    * Marcel Pauker, communist politician
    * Leonte Răutu, communist politician
    * Mihail Roller, communist politician
    * Valter Roman, communist politician
    * Solomon Tinkelman, communist activist
    * Leonte Tismăneanu, communist politician
    * Sorin Toma, communist activist
    * Ghizela Vass, communist activist
    * Belu Zilber, communist activist

    …plus many more.

    Comment by ExposeJEWSSR — April 29, 2008 #

  8. Thanks for this!

    Comment by Friedrich Braun — April 29, 2008 #

  9. Actually the method of jews gaining power is really quite simple:

    1. support each other (network) and

    2. do it undercover

    The first point will ensure, that they will have a competitive advantage over the individually acting whites. The second point will ensure, that the whites will not become aware of it and therefore do not react in unison (that is, until a too late stage. Then often comes the violent reaction).

    Of course, over time a few refinements are added, but the above is the basic strategy. Quite simple really. Amazing, that only so few of us seem to be able grasp it. Even more amazing, that we appear unable to emulate this strategy for our own advantage.

    No alleged high IQ of jews need to be assumed for this strategy to be successful. I don’t buy this anyway. One must not forget the power of the jewish media. Check up the IQ of Nations. Israel is not doing well there. Even if one assumes Palistinians to pull down the average.

    Furthermore, I have firsthand experience. My high school class consisted of about 1/3 jews. None were particularly bright, as a matter of fact they tended to be at he lower end, certainly below average. My impression was more, that their parents were pushing them up in order to give them a good education.

    I just can’t get over it, that such a basically very simple strategy can yield such extraordinary results over the millenia, and the stupid goy just don’t wise up.

    Comment by 123 — April 30, 2008 #

  10. Israel’s 19% (and growing) Arab population pulls down average Israeli IQ, as 123 noted. Also the Oriental Jews (Sephardim) who have little or no IQ-enhancing European blood (compared to the Ashkenazim) possess a lower average IQ than both the European Jews and White Gentiles thus further reducing Israel’s average.

    Q: If the killing of one’s father is parricide, the killing of one’s mother is matricide and the killing of oneself is suicide, what is the correct term of the killing of a Chosenite?

    A: Pesticide

    Comment by Al Ross — April 30, 2008 #

  11. “Amazing, that only so few of us seem to be able grasp it. Even more amazing, that we appear unable to emulate this strategy for our own advantage.”

    That’s what the Third Reich was all about. Prof. Kevin MacDonald called National Socialism the “mirror strategy.” Sometimes when fighting an enemy one should adopt his characteristics. The idea of a Master Race was the German equivalent of the Chosen People motif.

    Comment by Friedrich Braun — May 1, 2008 #

  12. How could it be, that this website is allowed?

    Comment by Jack — May 6, 2008 #

  13. Let me guess, an indoctrinated, self-hating denizen of the anti-German, Zionist, illegitimate Bastardstate…not a real German, of course, but a loathsome creation of the treasonous BRD…a Bundesbürger (or just Landesverräter, as I prefer to call such masochistic specimens) who cheers and applauds his nation’s criminalization of any criticism of multiculturalism or the immigration invasioin or Jewry, and someone who undboubtedly doesn’t see a problem with jailing Revisonists. No, he welcomes it!

    Who’s the totalitarian here, Bundesbürger?

    I just wish such anti-German neurotics as Jack would put themselves out of their misery and leave the rest of us alone.

    Comment by Friedrich Braun — May 6, 2008 #

  14. Just one more attack on Jews, that Christians began centuries, in fact millennia, ago and passed on to others, including Hitler. Some thought we had horns!

    Societies owe so much to Jews– Einstein, etc etc.

    I have not doubt that indivuals among the 6(?) million Jews murdered by Hitler’s Germany and Eastern so-called Christians that hated Jews, a national pastime in Poland and Russia, et al.

    Go find another group to torture. There are many. In fact they are already being tortured. Darfur etc etc.

    Albert

    Comment by Albert Rothman — August 3, 2008 #

  15. Rothman if life for you is so bad MAKE ALIYAH to your zionist entity!

    Isn’t that what is was created for in the first place???? So your kind could find refuge someplace??…. but no… you continue to whine and complain instead of leaving. This proves that the zionist entity is in fact just a place for your criminal co-ethnics to hide out when on the lamb whilst the rest of organized jewry continues their Culture Distortion and Race Replacement schemes!!

    ALSO: one could simplify 123 two steps method described above and call what jews do HYPER-ETHNOCENTRISM, which is a term Prof. Macdonald uses.

    Comment by Phoebus_412 — August 4, 2008 #

  16. “The jew cries as he strikes you” — old Eastern European saying.

    Comment by Phoebus_412 — August 4, 2008 #

  17. Albert Rothman, do you accept that the Jews are to at least some extent the architects of their own problems? Why is it, Albert Rothman, that Jews generate so much hostility…at all times and everywhere? By not accepting any blame for anti-Semitism, you’re adopting a morally irresponsible position, don’t you think?

    “Go find another group to torture. There are many. In fact they are already being tortured. Darfur etc etc.”

    The usual Jewish histrionics, Albert Rothman.

    Comment by Friedrich Braun — August 5, 2008 #

Leave a comment

XHTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Powered by WordPress.
Entries and comments feeds. Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^

Donate towards my web hosting bill!