The Civic Platform - A Political Journal of Ideas and Analysis » A friendly chat with Constantin von Hoffmeister

A friendly chat with Constantin von Hoffmeister

The following exchange occurred between me and Constantin von Hoffmeister:

2007/6/29, Constantin von Hoffmeister Ave!
This is a true story: Tonight my Russian friend celebrated his
birthday at a hip cafe. A lot of famous Russian nationalists were
present. I went there with my American friend Rob (who is the nephew
of famous White nationalist Bob Whitaker). We drank some beers.
Since David Duke was in town and Rob is a good friend of him, I
suggested to invite David Duke. Sure enough, one hour later, David
Duke showed up. Considering that David Duke had lived in Russia for
five years, it was - again! - shocking for me to observe that he was
not able to read the Russian menu! Anyway, I immediately engulfed
David Duke into a discussion about Israel. I told him how much I
supported Israel. David Duke freaked out, telling me: "WHY DO YOU
SUPPORT THE JEWS?" I told him that I supported Israel because Israel
is one of the few countries that ACTIVELY fight against the Muslim
scum, and the Muslim scum WAS THE MAIN THREAT TO EUROPE. David Duke,
naturally - since he is a psychopath - freaked out, raised his
voice, and SCREAMED: "CONSTANTIN! ! ! I DON'T UNDERSTAND YOU!!! WHY DO
YOU SUPPORT THE JEWS???" He emphasized the word "JEWS." I told him
that it was not only "the Jews" who are currently dismantling
Western civilization, but WHITE PEOPLE in general. David Duke,
again, freaked out and started SCREAMING (like a
madman): "CONSTANTIN! ! ! WHY DO YOU SUPPORT THE JEWS???" It was
amusing. I told David Duke that I would always defend Israel, no
matter what. Again, David Duke had a fit of rage. Then he left and
sat at another table. Meanwhile, I was discussing the matter with
the Russian Fascists who were present at the table (including one
Russian Orthodox priest). Most of them told me that Duke was wrong.
They, and I agree!, said that Duke acted treacherously when he went
to Iran. They said, and I agree!, that Islam was the NUMBER ONE
ENEMY OF EUROPE. They also, albeit reluctantly, agreed that Israel
is an ally in this titanic struggle. In the end, I can say that I am
able to control Russian nationalist sentiments.
Kind Regards,
Constantin
friedrich_wilhelm_braun@[...]
A bizarroid buffoon, drug-addled turd, and proven liar such the individual known as "Constatin von Hoffmeister" should normally be the last person in the world to make pronouncements on the mental condition of others.
Dr. David Duke has written two White Nationalist bestsellers, countless insightful articles, produces an excellent radio show, has obtained 65% of the White vote in Louisiana when he ran for governor and was for years a state representative (no other open WN has ever had the same level of electoral success in the US), travels the world and meets with foreign politicial leaders, delivers thousands of speeches all over the world, has completed a Ph.D. in the Ukraine (but can't read a menu)...vs a total nobody and general laughingstock like "Constatin" whom absolutely no one takes seriously, a nobody who has accomplished exactly NOTHING (ok, he writes bad Bolshevik poetry that he then spams around the 'net), a nobody with no following whatsoever.. .yet, we're asked to believe that David Duke was bested in an argument by the loserish "Constantin" ! Yeah, right. Additionally, we're asked to believe that Russian patriots and Orthodox clergy share his philosemitism and Zionism. Yeah, right. Not only that: he boasts of controlling them! lol Nice delusions of grandeur. I can't blame Duke for not wanting to sit besides such complete freaks.
David Duke has answered this "Islam as the enemy of Europe & the White man" argument a hundred times already...so I doubt that he was somehow tongue-tied with "Constantin" around. A rather biased, self-serving piece of reporting, that was.
...
On the last day of the conference, the wonderful French writer/philosopher Guillaume Faye spoke about the “Threat to the West.” In an excellent presentation he focused on the internal and external threat of fundamentalist Islam to Europe. It is my belief that we must stop the non-European immigration into our homelands, but I also firmly believe that supporting the Jewish extremist, Neocon ”Clash of Civilizations” external war is disastrous. The Iraq War and adventurism elsewhere are taking our focus from the real threats here at home. And the so-called war on terrorism has spawned the means they use to suppress our freedoms here at home. As all of you have heard me say repeatedly: “It is not the Iraqi borders that we should be concerned with, but the Mexican-American border.”
It is also my belief that the immigration problem itself and perhaps even more importantly, the destruction of European American consciousness and traditions, the advance of egalitarianism, feminism and multiculturalism, globalism — all have been driven by Jewish extremists in their relentless quest for supremacy. It was not the Arabs who opened our immigration floodgates, who took over our anthropological sciences, who led the multicultural and diversity march, who weakened us with Marxism, Freudianism, Feminism, pornography, abortion and acceptance of non-reproductive sexual deviance and every sort of debilitating cultural, physical and spiritual nihilism. Even more important, it has not been the Arabs who have seized the control points of mass media as well as the sources of political finance and influence that have led to the ethnic cleansing of our people across the European World. Although we must oppose massive immigration with all our ability, it is not Arabs or Muslims who have led the attack on our people. In fact, they weren’t even the ones who changed our immigration laws.
In short, the West, has not simply succumbed to an external or even a natural phenomenon among us. We have been subverted by extremists who have destroyed our own ethnic consciousness and ethnic dominance while they have relentlessly worked for their own genetic and political supremacy. While they have opened our gates in America and Europe, Israel’s own Jewish demographic mastery is foremost in all their considerations.
So I became concerned listening to a subtle message that we should be happy because the Zionists were now going to be our friends and allies, something that I think is a dangerous notion to our ultimate survival. There are certainly Jewish supremacists who fear the rising Muslim clout in Europe in America as a competing political interest group, but even that minority of Jews bemoan and admit the fact that the overwhelming Jewish extremist establishment supports open borders in the West. They believe that their control can be maintained the multiculturalism of the West under a Jewish cultural, media, music, and political umbrella. They think that they can thrive in what Jewish activist Stephen Steinlight calls their policy of “divide and conquer.” In my opinion, although Arab power is an important problem to them, the powers of Jewish supremacism still fear the European far more than the Arab. They believe that they can with their copious talents, subvert and eventually control the “Muslim problem.”
As a side note, their clever subversion of their enemies can be seen in the recent sectarian violence between Shiite and Sunni Muslims of Iraq. It is exactly what Israel has historically sought among its Arab neighbors. In Jewish Supremacism, I note the diaries of Israeli Prime Minister Moshe Sharett in discussing how Israel did everything it could in false flag operations to foster and promote the Lebanese Civil War. Even Ariel Sharon’s facilitation of the Sabre and Shatila massacre in Beirut can be seen as expressions of that divide and conquer policy. Israel cannot afford an “American liberated Iraq” to now be dominated by a Shiite, pro-Iran, anti-Israel, American refurbished state. How elementally easy it would have been for the Mossad to have perpetrated the Askariya mosque bombing either directly through their own agents or their steering of Mossad-infiltrated Arab organizations. It is in their interest to destabilize the country, for such offers no danger to Israel.
During the Amren convention it seemed some speakers were practically cheer leading for the Neocon foreign adventurism. Perle, Wolfowitz, Crystal, Feith, Abrams, Libby and their ilk would have loved to hear our leaders enlisted in their proposed World War IV for Israel. I need not remind you that almost all these men in the Neoconservative movement are in fact former Trotskyites who subverted traditional conservatives and have been for open immigration as well as every kind of movement destructive of European American heritage and rights. These facts are abundantly clear.
It was in that context that I asked the question of Guillaume Faye, I praised his stirring speech, and asked as politely as I could, that in regard to the old Islamic invasions of hundreds of years ago, another middle eastern group in Western society worked to undermine our defenses. That historic fact shows them to have opened the gates at both Constantinople and at Grenada to the invaders, and that they have been the primary force that has opened the immigration gates of the West in the last 50 years. I asked him what suggestions he had in dealing with the internal part of our problem, the subversion of our means and our will?
I let the question be open-ended, I didn’t want to disrupt or debate with him, and I proceeded to sit down and let him answer unimpeded and unchallenged. But, when I finished my question, Mr. Michael Hart rose up in an almost perfect Jewish caricature, and started to scream at me,
This is how the Jewish publication The Forward reported it.
But Michael Hart, a squat, balding Jewish astrophysicist from Maryland, was not amused. He rose from his seat, strode toward Duke (who loomed over him like an Aryan giant), spit out a curse — “You f…ing Nazi, you’ve disgraced this meeting” — and exited.
Still, I did not debate with him, or even attempt to defend myself from his vile attack; I just sat down so that Faye could answer the question.

I had no intention, or purpose of disruption, just wanted to see what ideas Guillaume had on the issue. He could take it as softly or rigorously as he chose.

My question was rather mild, in fact, far less stringent that the strong remarks of Amren’s recently featured Conference speaker, Joseph Sobran. Faye responded by saying “The danger of the Jews is not the same as danger of the Arabs,'’ he said. He continued: “The Jew is” — and here he had to have Taylor interpret a French expression — “the hole in the dike.”

“The water is immigration,” he continued. “We must fight on two fronts, but not by the same means. We must be very acute in our strategy. The best thing is to not speak about the Jews. They don’t exist. For me, they are like Eskimos.”
I could have responded that the ocean will be out there no matter what. That we can do little about the level of the ocean but we can maintain our dikes. And, if indeed extremist Jews are “the hole in the dike,” how do we address this hole in our dike if we are not even allowed to speak or even know of it?

Still, I regret the incident, for it wasn’t my intention to foment any disruption among men I both admire and respect. If I had any idea that there were such hate-filled, Jewish extremists present who would have made such a scene, I would have remained silent in respect for the decorum of the conference. After, all it wasn’t my meeting.

Yet, in the end it should be clear that Michael Hart was the one who chose to make a disruption in a reptilian response to my rather mild question. It was he that acted in a stereotypical Jewish way and screamed obscenities at someone asking a perfectly legitimate question. He should apologize to Jared Taylor, all the participants of the conference, and frankly, to me as well. I don’t expect such as our major opponents have never been gentlemen or should I say, gentile-men.

Here are some quotes about it from the Jewish Neocon newspaper The Forward,
http://www.davidduk e.com/general/ 496_496.html

"J. Slavyanski" wrote:
Mr. Duke’s degree was an honorary one from a private university which has often had a spurious reputation in Ukraine.

Mr. Duke doesn’t read Russian because he doesn’t give a shit about Russians, Ukrainians, or white people in general(oh wait, I’m sorry, he cares about the women of course).

Because Duke is a fraud, and because his behavior clearly contradicts the values he espouses, he should be roundly condemned by anyone of any political stripe, because he is a con-man.

Constantin, I cannot fully respect your expose of these people, simply because as much as you belittle them and expose their treachery(things far worse than Duke), you continue to associate with these people on a regular basis. You should choose sides. The Russian nationalists are cowards, they should have destroyed him long ago for spitting in their faces.

JPS

friedrich_wilhelm_braun@…

Mr. Duke’s degree was an honorary one from a private university which has often had a spurious reputation in Ukraine.

Both assertions are manifestly false. The Forward (a jewish rag) writes:

“The school was founded in 1989 as a private alternative to Ukraine’s public university. It now has about 57,000 students. Courses on business and agriculture are taught on a leafy campus that is decked with only a slight overdose of blue and yellow Ukrainian flags.”
http://www.davidduke.com/general/1313_1313.html#more-1313

He earned his degree.

Mr. Duke doesn’t read Russian

And you know this…how?

(oh wait, I’m sorry, he cares about the women of course).

Irrelevant third-rate gossip. [Are you jealous that at his age he gets more pussy than you do?]

David Duke learned long ago that White Nationalists are cult-followers that will give money willingly to slick-talking types like himself.

If White Nationalists are cultists, what are today Marxist-Leninists?

“He has proven this throughout the years. He has been convicted of mail fraud and tax evasion, and in fact it was because of this that he fled to Russia and Ukraine in the first place. ”

Funny bullshit. I don’t know all the ins and outs of Duke’s legal problems (and neither do you), but if ZOG told me tomorrow that the earth was oval-shaped, I would start having doubts about it.

And I thought you were leaving the list because you were too busy working with prostitutes (or something like that)?

Good bye.

38 Comments »

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

“J. Slavyanski” wrote:

Hey moron, his degree was honorary, get over it. Oh and how do we know he doesn’t speak Russian? Oh gee, it could have something to do with Constantin KNOWING DAVID DUKE AND LIVING IN FUCKING RUSSIA.

Oh and who is surprised by the honorable “White Nationalist” who refers to his own women as “pussy”. Gee, I thought you didn’t like rap and blacks for that reason? Oh that’s right, White Nationalists are full of shit, I almost forgot.

Duke doesn’t need a woman with you sucking his cock from a few thousand miles away. It’s almost tragic how you simple followers suck up to a man who pleaded guilty to multiple counts of fraud. And when faced with that he just mentions the word “Joo” and you all salute.

If you guys are the savior of the ‘White race’, I’d say it’s fucked.

JPS

…

This list seems to attract a fair number of hilarious and daft characters.

Hey moron, his degree was honorary, get over it. Oh and how do we know he doesn’t speak Russian? Oh gee, it could have something to do with Constantin KNOWING DAVID DUKE AND LIVING IN FUCKING RUSSIA.

“If Constantin [a proven, compulsive liar] said something, it must be true!”

Oh and who is surprised by the honorable “White Nationalist” who refers to his own women as “pussy”. Gee, I thought you didn’t like rap and blacks for that reason? Oh that’s right, White Nationalists are full of shit, I almost forgot.

I don’;t like blacks because they say the word “pussy” [actually they don’t, the normal staple is rather “bitch” and “hoe”] in rap? hmmm….no. There are far more substantive reasons than their “musical” tastes.

Oh that’s right, White Nationalists are full of shit, I almost forgot.

Someone who has been all over the map ideologically-speaking, should have the good sense of refraining from questioning other people’s credibility.

Duke doesn’t need a woman with you sucking his cock from a few thousand miles away. It’s almost tragic how you simple followers suck up to a man who pleaded guilty to multiple counts of fraud. And when faced with that he just mentions the word “Joo” and you all salute.

Ah yes…plea bargaining with ZOG’s justice system is a clear evidence of guilt. We all know how White Nationalists get a fair shake, if you doubt it just ask Randy Weaver’s or Matt Hale’s families.

I won’t comment on the zaniness and vulgarity (from someone who whines about the use of the word “pussy”!).

Comment by Friedrich Braun — June 30, 2007 #
Where is this discussion taking place?

Comment by Daedalus — June 30, 2007 #
On an elist.

More here:

http://forum.grossdeutsches-vaterland.net/showthread.php?t=20897

Comment by Friedrich Braun — June 30, 2007 #
David’s The Man. And there ain’t even a close second. This record proves it. And that settles it.

Comment by Glenn Miller — June 30, 2007 #
Why is Duke always in Russia?

Comment by Daedalus — June 30, 2007 #
What brings you here, Traitor Glenn?

Comment by Daedalus — June 30, 2007 #
The Russians seem to have taken a liking to him and he gets a good reception over there. The same can be said of Eastern Europe in General. When he was in Hungary a few months ago to promote a Hungarian translation of his work on Jews, he was able to fill with people a large auditorium.

Comment by Friedrich Braun — June 30, 2007 #
The anti-semitic wing of American White Nationalism is in disarray: Duke abroad, Strom in prison, Pierce dead. Someone needs to step into that void. OTOH, I suppose Jared Taylor’s profile has risen.

Comment by Scimitar — July 1, 2007 #
That’s much better!

Comment by Scimitar — July 1, 2007 #
The movement needs new blood.

Comment by Friedrich Braun — July 1, 2007 #
“In the end, I can say that I am
able to control Russian nationalist sentiments.”

Anyone else note Big Von’s megalomania, here? Both he and Duke are scenesters; the differences being age, libido, and quantity of narcotics consumed per diem. Big Von retreats from the Jewish problem because: a) he’s half kraut, which means his viewpoint is basically European (though he wouldn’t be amusing at all if he weren’t half Ami) and b) he wants acceptance among the tepid Muslim-obsessed Ivans and, more importantly, Ivanas, which sends Duke into a squealing tizzy. Both of them suffer from circumstantial purblindness. Big Von is a free-wheeling scenester egomaniac who thinks he’s some sort of diplomat. Duke is closer to actually being a diplomat. Big Von will never meet with a Russian government functionary, and will be content to imagine that his Russian drinking buddies are revolutionary and he’s in the thick of it all. Duke actually had a minor role in a conference staged by the Iranian President himself with the explicit purpose of examining the “Holocaust” claim. I don’t like Duke myself - he’s a mild curiosity - but I’d say that’s a better qualification that Big Von’s self-important ramblings. But then, the new crop of web-nationalists (Civic Platform and Majority Rights, e.g.) don’t care about that. They like the Exploits of Big Von, he makes himself seem like a real man of the world, and they get off on the association. Dugin is the Messiah and Big Von is his Prophet. Selah. In saelulo saeculorum, amen.

Comment by Marshall Lentini — July 1, 2007 #
*than
*saeculo

Comment by ML — July 1, 2007 #
A quick note on the GDV discussion:

Pervitinist says:

“No matter what”? [In reference to Big Von’s declaration that: “I would always defend Israel, no matter what.”] That means he must have some “special” (personal/family) relationship with Judaism that goes beyond mere outward sympathy or political reasoning. He’s either the perfect shabbaz goy or a Jew himself.

More probably it points to a romantic liaison between Big Von and a Russian Jewess, if not an Israeli. The erotic impulse is notorious for making hyperbolically-inclined men like Big Von speak in such fashion, esp. when it comes to Jews. How much of American policy is inspired by goyim who are married to Jewesses?

I can hardly believe that there are no Russian Nationalists who realize that “fighting Islam” is not our war.

No one said Russians are intelligent. Furthermore, one has to look at it from the street perspective, like they do: they don’t see Jews, they see Caucasians. Same old short-sightedness as anywhere else. But then, Jewish involvement in Russian immigration policy is nowhere near as evident or demonstrable as is American policy.

I believe that Constantin von Hoffmeister is his real name. He claims to be a Prussian nobleman, yet was applauding the rape of German women by Bolshevik hordes.

Years ago - 2004? - I had my first encounter with Big Von on VNN, where Linder was posting some of his crackpot “essays” (I believe they were Aryans on the moon, and something about wanting a state for Aryans just like Israel). Someone asked about his name and BV, very predictably, claimed his name means HOPE-MASTER. I am not even kidding. I tried telling him it was a minor spelling variant of German culture’s old and respected Hofmeister - master of court/household - but he wasn’t hearing that, naturally. He is firmly HOPEMASTER and the Von, he claims, was earned by his grandfather in Germany’s rather wretched involvement in putting down the Boxer Rebellion (students of history will recall the Kaiser’s ill-fated Hunnenrede). I can well believe that a humble German domestic name would be aggrandized by the Prussian authority for such wanton political oppression. It is not established, however, that Big Von’s family is Prussian itself, and is in all probability a fabrication. I remind everyone that he is half American, graduating from the Thomas A. Roberts Berlin American School in ‘94: http://www.berlinbrats.org/alumni_1990.htm

Comment by Marshall Lentini — July 1, 2007 #
BTW, Constantin is reposting your posts elsewhere.

Comment by Scimitar — July 1, 2007 #
Where is that? You guys really keep tabs on each other. I only saw “friedrich braun” repost my shit on GDV. Oh well, the subject is exhausted.

Comment by Marshall Lentini — July 1, 2007 #
1.) I don’t know enough about Constantin to judge him. I have only a passing familarity with him from his posts at Skadi.
2.) Here

Comment by Scimitar — July 1, 2007 #
Ah, I see. At Les Phora, where smartasses go to congratulate each other.

Of course, he will deny that I know anything about him. I don’t know that he smokes Marlboro Lights and studies Hebrew. I know nothing about his Ruskie girlfriend. And to be fair, I don’t know his background exactly, but it’s obviously not uh, “Prussian nobility”, and I suspect there is scheissami somewhere. Unless krauts were sent to American schools in Berlin just for the fuck of it.

It’s funny that he posts it elsewhere instead of saying a word to me. He could at least thank me for the bones I threw to him by way of praise. Das wär für ein Egomane wie er zu viel verlangt…

Comment by Marshall Lentini — July 1, 2007 #
How exactly do you know Constantin? Are you from the e-list friedrich referenced above?

Comment by Scimitar — July 1, 2007 #
God no. I have nothing to do with all that germanophilic garbage. I just have a fetish for these egomaniacal internet personalities. I love seeing people bandy their names about and can almost feel along with them the spiritual hardon that comes with a growing internet reputation. What have you understand about guys like Big Von, as I said in the beginning, is that they basically want to feel important, like they’re players in some soon-to-be-earthshaking movement. Big Von has the additional drawback of thinking he’s an artist, which makes him doubly egotistical. Criticisms aside, he is an interesting character, and every few months I’m glad to waste a few minutes at work dissecting him. What fools people about Big Von is that he’s actually in Russia talking to people involved in whatever worthless scene they have going. This allows he himself to believe what he’s doing is important, and secondly his all-too-willing audience of gullible morons (at sites like the Phora and LJ). Web nationalists live for this shit. Pretending they’re some rising shadow-government or cultural revival waiting to shed light over the masses with their isms and endless combinations of nationalities and political concepts (carefully avoiding outspoken, naked anti-Semitism, of course). But Big Von has something more: he travels. Most nationalist types don’t travel. Germans who travel are usually faggots with dreadlocks and sandals. Big Von, a mere English teacher, supplements his time with the pretense of political activity, which is all Russian nationalism - of any kind - amounts to. If Globetrekker were hosted by an ex-Nazi with artistic pretensions, you’d have something very much like the day-to-day life of Constantin von Boshmeister.

Comment by Marshall Lentini — July 1, 2007 #
What’s your story? For someone not plugged into the internet nationalist scene, you seem to know an awful lot about Constantin - the brand of cigarettes he smokes, where he went to school, his ancestry, and so forth. In other words, what are your views, politically speaking? If we have crossed paths in the past, I am unaware of this. Your username doesn’t ring any bells.

Comment by Scimitar — July 1, 2007 #
My views are irrelevant, though can be extrapolated from what I’ve written above, I think. I’ve looked at this site a few times, can’t recall ever posting. As for CvH, information comes my way, and what doesn’t, I find.

Comment by Marshall Lentini — July 1, 2007 #
Constantin has been monitoring this thread. IMO he should chime in and respond to the points raised by friedrich and yourself above.

Comment by Scimitar — July 1, 2007 #
He won’t. (Or if he does, it will only be in response to me saying he won’t.) That wouldn’t be in character; the egomaniac does not indulge debate, but sits back and watches the “controversy”. Anyway, I have to get back to work.

Comment by Marshall Lentini — July 1, 2007 #
on Marshal Lentini by a man who knows him:

I know who Marshall Lentini. He is a pathetic male of Latin extraction in his mid 20’s (nothing wrong with this, but I think he has some kind of racial inferiority complex after skinheadz.net pulicly rebuked him, leading him to create skinheadzmustdie.blogspot.com/ — little obsessive, no?); he stalked a female friend of mine (Nordic Pollack). He is crazy, but not in our vein: he is simply misguided, lacking, he acts stoic and hard because he has nothing else; no drive, no talent, no real goal. He also lives with his mother. The girl he was stalking is now dating a good friend of mine, an Iberian chap, who also had negative experiences with him. I can get his phone number/address/paydirt for antics.

Comment by Fritz Walter — July 1, 2007 #
Mr. Walter’s name - I suspect - is Ioan or something. He’s an unkempt Canadian who thinks he’s educated and, for some reason, a Berber, evidently because I once told him he looks somewhat maghrebish. He will recall that I have his personal information, and that if he were to abuse any of mine that he may somehow acquire, I would pay him a visit at his mother’s house (where he also lives, and once invited me to stay). I trust the moderator will take note that such “antics” are legally actionable and put such childish indiscretion far from him.

For the record, which this young man enjoys skewing against me as much as skinheadz.net, Barrett did not “publicly rebuke me” but, as I have made abundantly clear to anyone with a sense of fairness in their bones - which this petty little fool does not - Barrett systematically doctors correspondence to suit his ends, including an e-mail to me. In response I made a blog detailing his malfeasance. If it is “obsessive” to want to put down the flagrant lies of small men, then you can well count me among those obsessed.

A few quick notes on certain turns of phrase in there that I find amusing:
“of Latin extraction” - you’d think this were obvious after posting under my real name; but no, by pointing it out as “Latin”, he gets the thrill of “exposing” something I’ve not hidden, capitalizing, as it were, on WN-popular prejudice against Italians;
“some kind of racial inferiority complex” - aaand again;
“he stalked a female friend of mine (Nordic Pollack)” - I wouldn’t put it past myself, but I simply have no idea who he’s talking about;
“He is crazy, but not in our vein” - undoubtedly the most amusing of all: for here the author indicates that he considers himself (and “you” generally, trying to give himself the illusion of camaraderie or argumentum ad populum) “crazy” in the oh-he-so-craaazy, lovable, interesting, make-a-documentary-about-these-guys-already sense: i.e. he’s completely fucking vain and likes to tell you that;
“The girl he was stalking is now dating a good friend of mine, an Iberian chap,” - if this Mr. Walter is who I think he is, he evidently saw me talking to this girl on MySpace, but what he doesn’t know, and what he’s too self-absorbed to find out for himself, is that I’ve known this girl for over a decade, have spent days on end at her apartment, with the “Iberian chap”, who is, by the way, actually a good friend of mine, not his. See for yourself: http://i15.tinypic.com/6235od4.jpg

The truth is that Ioan is good friends with Big Von, and he’s always hated when I pick on him. It doesn’t help, certes, that I do it so well.

Now Ioan, on the level — go back to your Death In June and don’t make childish threats you’ll regret. And also, try not to lie about me. It hurts my feelings.

Comment by Marshall Lentini — July 2, 2007 #
*en e-mail from me

Comment by Marshall Lentini — July 2, 2007 #
I was actually waiting for this guy to show up. Big Von’s self-appointed public defender. Where Big Von wisely stays out of the ring - or only here & there “laughs” at the pitiable doubters - Ioan here leaps into the fray with all the charm and fervor of a gossiping teenybopper.

Oh well……

Comment by Marshall Lentini — July 2, 2007 #
One more thing I find funny: after he spread around the Barrett-produced lies a little, and I very briefly took him to task for it, he protested that he had had my blog on RSS “for weeks now”. So we know that he knows that Barrett lies: what does that tell us about Ioan? That he is also a lying little shit. More important than personal info is the hint of his character, which dispenses with facts, and what is more his own better knowledge to slander someone else and back it up with puerile shit like “dur hur imma post yer number”. Give me a break. Hey, I’ll post my fucking number and address. Who the fuck cares?

Comment by Marshall Lentini — July 2, 2007 #
I’m not familar with Barrett either. What is the cause of your animus against this individual?

Comment by Scimitar — July 2, 2007 #
He’s an old shyster in Mississippi who runs this gay website skinheadz.net. Literally everyone from Strom to Linder has the deepest antipathy for him. He basically lives in a fantasy world where he, and his handful of underage skinhead cronies, are honorable representatives of white nationalism, and everyone else is wrong. He literally rewrites correspondence to his own taste and posts these on his site. Or he’ll threaten to sue blogger or whatever ISP if someone uses the word “Skinheadz” in a way he doesn’t like; then he’ll post that on his site couched in melodramatic language like, “the next to fall was…” He’s a sickening old creep, seriously. Here’s the Wiki article I helped complete: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Barrett_%28lawyer%29

There are links to plenty of testimonials, including my own very extensive one, which has appropriate visual evidence and so on. This is why it’s in patent bad faith for this Ioan kid to come on here taking Barrett’s mythical line: he knows it’s bullshit, but uses it for effect when he needs to slander me. Much in the same way Barrett makes shit up to make himself feel like the man, and others feel like they’ve been had. Then, when someone tries to clear their name, they are called “obsessed” and so on. In all seriousness, I’m certainly no good citizen, but people like this - Barrett and Ioan - make me regret ever looking at a computer screen.

Oh, by the way, I just figured out who this “Nordic Pollack” is he claims I “stalked”. It was some Polish metal whore on MySpace with a nose that only described as Proto-Negroid, and whose tits I asked to see one time. That, in Ioanland, is “stalking”. Who else can you think of that abuses the concept “stalking” for social effect? Women. — This kid Ioan would be a nuisance to me if he weren’t so wide of the mark. He knows only what he sees on bloody MySpace.

Comment by Marshall Lentini — July 2, 2007 #
One more thing, actually pertinent to the original post: Barrett has boasted about his role in Duke’s arrest and continues to excoriate him.

http://www.nationalist.org/alt/2000/nov/duke.html
http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2003/may.html#McPherson

Note the totally fatuous, phony, condescending, mock-journalistic tone in which it’s all done. The guy is living in a fantasy world completely of his own making, and worse than that, it’s all in very bad taste and not a little gay.

Comment by Marshall Lentini — July 2, 2007 #
Has been brought to my attention that the aforenamed Ioan is not Fritz Walter. Due apologies to the former. As to the latter, he still has no idea what he’s talking about.

Comment by Marshall Lentini — July 2, 2007 #
Ahhh, yes. It was Jim, a young man from Georgia, who also, by the way, lives with his mother, and is completely whacked out on drugs. Puzzling that he’d think our mutual friend would give up any kind of information about me. Not that I care too much.

Mystery solved. You always did strike me as something of a child, Jim. Like when you cut off contact with me because of something that had nothing at all to do with you. And here you are, poking your nose in something that doesn’t concern you at all and talking shit. Unlike you, though, I won’t make threats. I won’t threaten to put up that photo of C - your alleged “Nordic Pollack”, with black hair and a Mongoloid face if there ever was one - licking the blood on all those asinine gashes you put in your arm. Not even goths do that anymore, dude. Despite your muscles, and the ridiculous “metal demon” faces you make for pictures, you’re nothing but a pussy.

Comment by Marshall Lentini — July 2, 2007 #
That “he’s crazy, but not in our vein” remark makes much more sense now. Jim thinks he’s “crazy”, you see. He’ll pop any kind of pill by the dozen, take pictures of the act and put them on MySpace, drink, lift weights, mix a protein shake, listen to some noisome death metal, and think he’s a raving lunatic. It does not escape the notice of those who associate with him, however, that this is all rather just an act, a caricature of someone leading a “crazy lifestyle”, comfortably from their parents’ home, at age 18, in an up-scale neighborhood…..

Comment by Marshall Lentini — July 2, 2007 #
But hey, just for shits & giggles, let’s have a look at the Nordic Pollack: http://i8.tinypic.com/4l58y9w.jpg

Hm. A real Aryan princess, no? Has the mjollnir and bull ring to prove it.

Comment by Marshall Lentini — July 2, 2007 #
Too old for Kevin Alfred Strom.

Comment by Scimitar — July 2, 2007 #
Looks like one of those chicks who hang around outside the mall. A bourgeois revolutionary, I’m guessing.

Comment by Scimitar — July 2, 2007 #
Fifteen years ago, none of this nordic shit was popular on the Continent. Neo-Nazis in East Germany talked and sang about Jews and Hitler, not Ian Stuart and “Odin”. Then the Wall came down, the internet sprang up, and EU-demoboros gobbled up the cultural backwater of Europe, which allowed these stupid little symbols to trickle in….the result: Poles with mjollnirs and “rebel” flags. Krauts in Nikes “marching” for Rudolf Hess (or for that matter: Big Von in Uzbekistan). Russians, drunk and sleazy as ever, sieg-heiling. Pure shallow hodgepodge all over the Continent: das ist ja weißer Nationalismus rüber de big Water. I cast my lot with goofy bedreadlocked German tourists as nearer to what one is obliged to call “humanity” rather than this pathetic subpolitical burlesque…

Comment by Marshall Lentini — July 2, 2007 #

A friendly chat with Constantin von Hoffmeister

38 Comments »

Leave a comment

Recent Comments

Archives:

Categories:

Visitors

Meta:

A friendly chat with Constantin von Hoffmeister

38 Comments »

Leave a comment

Greatest Hits

Recent Comments

Archives:

Categories:

Visitors

Meta: