Saying evolution works and created these brilliant and great Europeans or even Jews must be nauseating. In the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, they said they would promote Science and materialism over religion. It seems to me they have succeeded and anyone who thinks that Science can determine the unvarnished truth without any assumptions or beliefs is deluded. Science has a philosophy, that philosophy has an ideology, the ideology and philosophy shapes Science and its findings.

I bet there are black people who are far better at looking after their cultures and people than white people…yet all this detail is lost in ‘collectivist’ accounts.

Thank you for your polite answer. However, I was not “pretending to know what happened at the beginning”, I did not know and I wanted to know. If a person’s writings are obnoxious this is a valid reason for not giving him a forum.

I came to your site by way of interest in Kevin MacDonald and had no way of knowing the governing rules for posting. I can appreciate your strong personal feeling about your blog and would not presume to tell you how to be successful. But a really bad post would be scrolled down in a hurry, and posting contrary opinions, even poorly expressed have a way of spurring on the faithful to post insightful critiques.

And after reading Fred Scrooby remarks I am not any less curious. I have resigned myself to never knowing what Mon wrote, but this is less an annoyance than not knowing who kill Kennedy.

I think an article should only be taken off for using traditional foul language, and this does not include the N-word.

A very accurate observation.

Absent liberal politics, debating the more than obvious differences in intelligence among different ethnicities would make little more sense than debating whether or not Blacks really had curlier hair or darker skin than Whites.

If clearly observable physical differences exist between the races, why should it be an inviolate principle that differences below the skin cannot possibly exist?

Given these clearly observable and differences that exist in height, skin color, facial features, hair texture, eye color and susceptibility to certain deseases, wouldn’t it be most unlikely that intelligence alone has evolved exactly indentical in every race?

Certainly it is conceivable that natural selection would select for intelligence more in some environments than others.

Perhaps there was less evolutionary pressure to evolve greater intelligence in Africa than in Asia, for example. Perhaps Africans were as smart as they needed to be given the challenge of their environment.

Natural selection, seeking no grants and not having to commune with the far-left academia, has no politics. When it comes to science, politics is the elephant in the room.

Richard Lynn: Race Differences in Intelligence: An Evolutionary Analysis

Frank Salter: On Genetic Interests: Family, Ethny, and Humanity in an Age of Mass Migration

J.P.Rushton: Race, Evolution, and Behavior: A Life History Perspective (3rd Edition)

Arthur Jensen: The g Factor: The Science of Mental Ability (Human Evolution, Behavior, and Intelligence)

Michael Levin: Why Race Matters

Charles Murray and Richard Herrnstein: Bell Curve : Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life
http://www.thecivicplatform.com/2006/05/17/my-reading-suggestions-for-all-racialists-and-white-nationalists/

No, you have not, of course.

Have you at least read?:
Rushton, J. P., & Jensen, A. R. (2005). Thirty years of research on race differences in cognitive ability. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 235-294.
http://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/PPPL1.pdf

No, you have not, of course.

Come back when you have familiarized yourself with the scientific evidence contained in the above works. Until then, good bye.