98 Comments »

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

1. Please someone tell me the french title of this book and also where can I buy it?

   Comment by Kerol — November 18, 2007 #

2. Deux siècles ensemble:

   tome I

   http://www.amazon.fr/Deux-si%C3%A8cles-ensemble-1795-1995-r%C3%A9volution/dp/2213611580

   tome II

   http://www.amazon.fr/Deux-si%C3%A8cles-ensemble-1917-1972-sovi%C3%A9tique/dp/2213615187/ref=pd_sim_b_title_1/402-3174227-0464109

   Comment by Friedrich Braun — November 18, 2007 #

3. We cannot, this time, blame the American Jewish-controlled publishing business for the lack of an English-language edition of this most important book. Europe has four huge publishing companies (Germany’s Bertelsmann and Holtzbrinck which own, respectively Random House and Macmillan; France’s Lagardere and UK’s Pearson) and they have achieved the previously unmatched distinction of declining to include a Nobel Prize winning author on their list of new titles. An absolute scandal rooted in moral cowardice.

   Comment by Al Ross — November 18, 2007 #

4. Solzhenitsyn the only author who has moral courage to bring up the fact that Jews were the financial, ideological and intellegigence of the old Soviet Union. Glad he decided to do this book as now western countires are provocating Russia as the enemy and that it wants to start a new cold war, even suggesting that Russians are genetically inclined to despotism citing the Soviet Union. I hope exstracts of his book are published on various websites

   Comment by james — November 18, 2007 #

5. “We cannot, this time, blame the American Jewish-controlled publishing business for the lack of an English-language edition of this most important book.”
   )
   Why not?

   Comment by Friedrich Braun — November 18, 2007 #

6. It would be nice to know how Solzhenitsyn’s work on Jews was received in Russia.

   Comment by Friedrich Braun — November 18, 2007 #

7. It seems to me it could be translated and made available online.

   Comment by Tim — November 18, 2007 #

8. FB, if, as seems most likely, the Whites who control the big four EU publishing houses have exercised self-censorship because of their having stupidly internalized the racial concerns of the Chosenites, then the responsiblity for this debacle lies at their own door.

   Comment by Al Ross — November 18, 2007 #

9. Does this book exist in Spanish? Thanks all Gerry Fredercis

   Comment by Gerry Frederics — November 19, 2007 #

10. The Russian people seem to allow the Jews peace in Russia. But isn’t this ridiculous. Those bastards killed 65 millions Russians. The Jews have wrecked the Russian economy and are leaving in droves and the most ironic thing you’ve ever heard the Jews are asking Christian to help feed Jews in Russia. They don’t ask money for the poor Russians made poor by Communism, they only ask money for poor Jews so they can feed them. These bastards destroyed ever church in Russia, but didn’t harm one synagogue. http://www.jewwatch.com http://www.ihr.org http://www.natvan.com http://www.conspiracypenpal.com http://www.halturnershow.com

    Comment by George Matthews — November 19, 2007 #

11. Please refrain from calls to violence.

    Comment by Friedrich Braun — November 19, 2007 #

12. I don’t know whether it’s available in Spanish, I’ve heard that it’s available in German, however.

    Comment by Friedrich Braun — November 19, 2007 #

13. The book “Die Juden in der Sowjetunion” is available in German:
    http://www.herbig-verlag.de

    Comment by H.Berger — November 19, 2007 #

14. Statement by Richard Lynn, Professor Emeritus
    University of Ulster, December 5, 2005:
    “I’ve checked out Churchill’s Second World War and the statement is quite correct - not a single mention of Nazi ‘gas chambers,’ a ‘genocide’ of the Jews, or of ’six million’ Jewish victims of the war.
    Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages; the six volumes of Churchill’s Second World War total 4,448 pages; and De Gaulle’s three-volume Mémoires de guerre is 2,054 pages.
    In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will find no mention either of Nazi ‘gas chambers,’ a ‘genocide’ of the Jews, or of ’six million’ Jewish victims of the war.”
    _________________________________________________________________________________________

    Extract from The Holocaust Industry by Norman G. Finkelstein of the City University of New York (published by Verso, London and New York, 2000):
    ‘The Israeli Prime Minister’s office recently put the number of “living Holocaust survivors” at nearly a million’ (p.83).

    Comment by Jason Collett — November 21, 2007 #

15. The Unexpected Views of Four Key Diplomats on WW2
    The origins of World War 2 - the views of four diplomats close to events

    Joseph P. Kennedy, U.S. Ambassador to Britain during the years immediately preceding WW2 was the father of the famous American Kennedy dynasty. James Forrestal the first US Secretary of Defense (1947-1949) quotes him as saying “Chamberlain (the British Prime Minister) stated that America and the world Jews had forced England into the war”. (The Forrestal Diaries ed. Millis, Cassell 1952 p129).
    Count Jerzy Potocki, the Polish Ambassador in Washington, in a report to the Polish Foreign Office in January 1939, is quoted approvingly by the highly respected British military historian Major-General JFC Fuller. Concerning public opinion in America he says “Above all, propaganda here is entirely in Jewish hands…when bearing public ignorance in mind, their propaganda is so effective that people have no real knowledge of the true state of affairs in Europe… It is interesting to observe that in this carefully thought-out campaign… no reference at all is made to Soviet Russia. If that country is mentioned, it is referred to in a friendly manner and people are given the impression that Soviet Russia is part of the democratic group of countries… Jewry was able not only to establish a dangerous centre in the New World for the dissemination of hatred and enmity, but it also succeeded in dividing the world into two warlike camps…President Roosevelt has been given the power.. to create huge reserves in armaments for a future war which the Jews are deliberately heading for.” (Fuller, JFC: The Decisive Battles of the Western World vol 3 pp 372-374.)
    Hugh Wilson, the American Ambassador in Berlin until 1938, the year before the war broke out, found anti-Semitism in Germany ‘understandable’. This was because before the advent of the Nazis, “the stage, the press, medicine and law [were] crowded with Jews…among the few with money to splurge, a high proportion [were] Jews…the leaders of the Bolshevist movement in Russia, a movement desperately feared in Germany, were Jews. One could feel the spreading resentment and hatred.” (Hugh Wilson: Diplomat between the Wars, Longmans 1941, quoted in Leonard Mosley, Lindbergh, Hodder 1976).
    Sir Nevile Henderson, British Ambassador in Berlin ‘said further that the hostile attitude in Great Britain was the work of Jews and enemies of the Nazis, which was what Hitler thought himself’ (Taylor, AJP: The Origins of the Second World War Penguin 1965, 1987 etc p 324).
    Is all of this merely attributable to antisemitism?

    The economic background to the war is necessary for a fuller understanding, before casting judgement on the originators of these viewpoints.

    At the end of the First World War, Germany was essentially tricked [see Paul Johnson A History of the Modern World (1983) p24 and H Nicholson Peacemaking 1919 (1933) pp13-16] into paying massive reparations to France and other economic competitors and former belligerent countries in terms of the so-called Treaty of Versailles, thanks to the liberal American President Woodrow Wilson. Germany was declared to be solely responsible for the war, in spite of the fact that ‘Germany did not plot a European war, did not want one, and made genuine efforts, though too belated, to avert one.’ (Professor Sydney B Fay The Origins of the World War (vol. 2 p 552)).

    As a result of these massive enforced financial reparations, by 1923 the situation in Germany became desperate and inflation on an astronomical scale became the only way out for the government. Printing presses were engaged to print money around the clock. In 1921 the exchange rate was 75 marks to the dollar. By 1924 this had become about 5 trillion marks to the dollar. This virtually destroyed the German middle class (Koestler The God that Failed p 28), reducing any bank savings to a virtual zero.

    According to Sir Arthur Bryant the British historian (Unfinished Victory (1940 pp. 136-144):

    ‘It was the Jews with their international affiliations and their hereditary flair for finance who were best able to seize such opportunities.. They did so with such effect that, even in November 1938, after five years of anti-Semitic legislation and persecution, they still owned, according to the Times correspondent in Berlin, something like a third of the real property in the Reich. Most of it came into their hands during the inflation.. But to those who had lost their all this bewildering transfer seemed a monstrous injustice. After prolonged sufferings they had now been deprived of their last possessions. They saw them pass into the hands of strangers, many of whom had not shared their sacrifices and who cared little or nothing for their national standards and traditions.. The Jews obtained a wonderful ascendancy in politics, business and the learned professions (in spite of constituting) less than one percent of the population.. The banks, including the Reichsbank and the big private banks, were practically controlled by them. So were the publishing trade, the cinema, the theatres and a large part of the press – all the normal means, in fact, by which public opinion in a civilized country is formed.. The largest newspaper combine in the country with a daily circulation of four millions was a Jewish monopoly.. Every year it became harder and harder for a gentile to gain or keep a foothold in any privileged occupation.. At this time it was not the ‘Aryans’ who exercised racial discrimination. It was a discrimination that operated without violence. It was exercised by a minority against a majority. There was no persecution, only elimination.. It was the contrast between the wealth enjoyed – and lavishly displayed – by aliens of cosmopolitan tastes, and the poverty and misery of native Germans, that has made anti-Semitism so dangerous and ugly a force in the new Europe. Beggars on horseback are seldom popular, least of all with those whom they have just thrown out of the saddle.’

    Goodness gracious, Sir Arthur! What made you get out of the wrong side of the bed?

    Strangely enough, a book unexpectedly published by Princeton University Press in 1984, Sarah Gordon (Hitler, Germans and the “Jewish Question”) essentially confirms what Bryant says. According to her, ‘Jews were never a large percentage of the total German population; at no time did they exceed 1% of the population during the years 1871-1933.’ But she adds ‘Jews were over-represented in business, commerce, and public and private service.. They were especially visible in private banking in Berlin, which in 1923 had 150 private Jewish banks, as opposed to only 11 private non-Jewish banks.. They owned 41% of iron and scrap iron firms and 57% of other metal businesses.. Jews were very active in the stock market, particularly in Berlin, where in 1928 they comprised 80% of the leading members of the stock exchange. By 1933, when the Nazis began eliminating Jews from prominent positions, 85% of the brokers on the Berlin Stock exchange were dismissed because of their “race”.. At least a quarter of full professors and instructors (at German universities) had Jewish origins.. In 1905-6 Jewish students comprised 25% of the law and medical students.. In 1931, 50% of the 234 theatre directors in Germany were Jewish, and in Berlin the number was 80%.. In 1929 it was estimated that the per capita income of Jews in Berlin was twice that of other Berlin residents..’ etc etc.

    Arthur Koestler confirms the Jewish over-involvement in German publishing. ‘Ullstein’s was a kind of super-trust; the largest organization of its kind in Europe, and probably In the world. They published four daily papers in Berlin alone, among these the venerable Vossische Zeitung, founded in the eighteenth century, and the B.Z. am Mittag, an evening paper.. Apart from these, Ullstein’s published more than a dozen weekly and monthly periodicals, ran their own news service, their own travel agency, etc., and were one of the leading book publishers. The firm was owned by the brothers Ullstein - they were five, like the original Rothschild brothers, and like them also, they were Jews.’ (The God that Failed (1950) ed. RHS Crossman, p 31).

    Edgar Mowrer, Berlin correspondent for the Chicago Daily News, wrote an anti-German tract called Germany Puts the Clock Back (published as a Penguin Special and reprinted five times between December 1937 and April 1938). He nevertheless notes ‘In the all-important administration of Prussia, any number of strategic positions came into the hands of Hebrews.. A telephone conversation between three Jews in Ministerial offices could result in the suspension of any periodical or newspaper in the state.. The Jews came in Germany to play in politics and administration that same considerable part that they had previously won by open competition in business, trade, banking, the Press, the arts, the sciences and the intellectual and cultural life of the country. And thereby the impression was strengthened that Germany, a country with a mission of its own, had fallen into the hands of foreigners.’

    Mowrer says ‘No one who lived through the period from 1919 to 1926 is likely to forget the sexual promiscuity that prevailed.. Throughout a town like Berlin, hotels and pensions made vast fortunes by letting rooms by the hour or day to baggageless, unregistered guests. Hundreds of cabarets, pleasure resorts and the like served for purposes of getting acquainted and acquiring the proper mood..’ (pp. 153-4). Bryant describes throngs of child prostitutes outside the doors of the great Berlin hotels and restaurants. He adds ‘Most of them (the night clubs and vice-resorts) were owned and managed by Jews. And it was the Jews.. among the promoters of this trade who were remembered in after years.’ (pp. 144-5).

    Douglas Reed, Chief Central European correspondent before WWII for the London Times, was profoundly anti-German and anti-Hitler. But nevertheless he reported: ‘I watched the Brown Shirts going from shop to shop with paint pots and daubing on the window panes the word “Jew”, in dripping red letters. The Kurfürstendamm was to me a revelation. I knew that Jews were prominent in business life, but I did not know that they almost monopolized important branches of it. Germany had one Jew to one hundred gentiles, said the statistics; but the fashionable Kurfürstendamm, according to the dripping red legends, had about one gentile shop to ninety-nine Jewish ones.’ (Reed Insanity Fair (1938) p. 152-3). In Reed’s book Disgrace Abounding of the following year he notes ‘In the Berlin (of pre-Hitler years) most of the theatres were Jewish-owned or Jewish-leased, most of the leading film and stage actors were Jews, the plays performed were often by German, Austrian or Hungarian Jews and were staged by Jewish film producers, applauded by Jewish dramatic critics in Jewish newspapers.. The Jews are not cleverer than the Gentiles, if by clever you mean good at their jobs. They ruthlessly exploit the common feeling of Jews, first to get a foothold in a particular trade or calling, then to squeeze the non-Jews out of it.. It is not true that Jews are better journalists than Gentiles. They held all the posts on those Berlin papers because the proprietors and editors were Jewish’ (pp238-9).

    The Jewish writer Edwin Black notes ‘For example, in Berlin alone, about 75% of the attorneys and nearly as many of the doctors were Jewish.’ (Black, The Transfer Agreement (1984) p58.

    To cap it all, Jews were perceived as dangerous enemies of Germany after Samuel Untermeyer, the leader of the World Jewish Economic Federation, declared war on Germany on August 6 1933. (Edwin Black The Transfer Agreement: the Untold Story of the Secret Pact between the Third Reich and Palestine (1984) pp272-277) According to Black, ‘The one man who most embodied the potential death blow to Germany was Samuel Untermeyer.’ (p 369). This was the culmination of a worldwide boycott of German goods led by international Jewish organizations. The London Daily Express on March 24, 1933 carried the headline Judea Declares War on Germany. The boycott was particularly motivated by the German imposition of the Nuremberg Laws, which ironically were similar in intent and content to the Jewish cultural exclusivism practiced so visibly in present-day Israel (Hannah Arendt Eichmann in Jerusalem p 7).

    Hitler saw the tremendous danger posed to Germany by Communism. He appreciated the desperate need to eliminate this threat, a fact that earned him the immense hatred and animosity of the Jewish organisations and the media and politicians of the west which they could influence. After all, according to the Jewish writer Chaim Bermant, although Jews formed less than five percent of Russia’s population, they formed more than fifty percent of its revolutionaries. According to the Jewish writer Chaim Bermant in his book The Jews (1977, chapter 8):

    ‘It must be added that most of the leading revolutionaries who convulsed Europe in the final decades of the last century and the first decades of this one, stemmed from prosperous Jewish families.. They were perhaps typified by the father of revolution, Karl Marx.. Thus when, after the chaos of World War I, revolutions broke out all over Europe, Jews were everywhere at the helm; Trotsky, Sverdlov, Kamenev and Zinoviev in Russia, Bela Kun in Hungary, Kurt Eisner in Bavaria, and, most improbable of all, Rosa Luxemburg in Berlin.

    ‘To many outside observers, the Russian revolution looked like a Jewish conspiracy, especially when it was followed by Jewish-led revolutionary outbreaks in much of central Europe. The leadership of the Bolshevik Party had a preponderance of Jews.. Of the seven members of the Politburo, the inner cabinet of the country, four, Trotsky (Bronstein), Zinoviev (Radomsky), Kamenev (Rosenfeld) and Sverdlov, were Jews.’ Other authors agree with this:

    “There has been a tendency to circumvent or simply ignore the significant role of Jewish intellectuals in the German Communist Party, and thereby seriously neglect one of the genuine and objective reasons for increased anti-Semitism during and after World War 1.. The prominence of Jews in the revolution and early Weimar Republic is indisputable, and this was a very serious contributing cause for increased anti-Semitism in post-war years.. It is clear then that the stereotype of Jews as socialists and communists.. led many Germans to distrust the Jewish minority as a whole and to brand Jews as enemies of the German nation.” (Sarah Gordon Hitler, Germans and the ‘Jewish Question’ Princeton University Press (1984) p 23).

    “The second paroxysm of strong anti-Semitism came after the critical role of Jews in International Communism and the Russian Revolution and during the economic crises of the 1920s and 30s… Anti-Semitism intensified throughout Europe and North America following the perceived and actual centrality of Jews in the Russian Revolution.. Such feelings were not restricted to Germany, or to vulgar extremists like the Nazis. All over Northern Europe and North America, anti-Semitism became the norm in ‘nice society’, and ‘nice society’ included the universities.” (Martin Bernal, Black Athena vol. 1 pp. 367, 387).

    “The major role Jewish leaders played in the November (Russian) revolution was probably more important than any other factor in confirming (Hitler’s) anti-Semitic beliefs.” (J&S Pool, Who Financed Hitler, p.164).

    Hitler came to power in Germany with two main aims, the rectification of the unjust provisions of the Versailles Treaty, and the destruction of the Soviet/ Communist threat to Germany. Strangely enough, contrary to the mythology created by those who had an opposing ethnic agenda, he had no plans or desire for a larger war of conquest. Professor AJP Taylor showed this in his book The Origins of the Second World War, to the disappointment of the professional western political establishment. Taylor says, “The state of German armament in 1939 gives the decisive proof that Hitler was not contemplating general war, and probably not intending war at all” (p.267), and “Even in 1939 the German army was not equipped for a prolonged war; and in 1940 the German land forces were inferior to the French in everything except leadership” (p104-5). What occurred in Europe in 1939-41 was the result of unforeseen weaknesses and a tipping of the balance of power, and Hitler was an opportunist ‘who took advantages whenever they offered themselves’ (Taylor). Britain and France declared war on Germany, not the other way around. Hitler wanted peace with Britain, as the German generals admitted (Basil Liddell Hart, The Other Side of the Hill 1948, Pan Books 1983) with regard to the so-called Halt Order at Dunkirk, where Hitler had the opportunity to capture the entire British Army, but chose not to. Liddell Hart, one of Britain’s most respected military historians, quotes the German General von Blumentritt with regard to this Halt Order:

    “He (Hitler) then astonished us by speaking with admiration of the British Empire, of the necessity for its existence, and of the civilisation that Britain had brought into the world. He remarked, with a shrug of the shoulders, that the creation of its Empire had been achieved by means that were often harsh, but ‘where there is planing, there are shavings flying’. He compared the British Empire with the catholic Church – saying they were both essential elements of stability in the world. He said that all he wanted from Britain was that she should acknowledge Germany’s position on the Continent. The return of Germany’s colonies would be desirable but not essential, and he would even offer to support Britain with troops if she should be involved in difficulties anywhere..” (p 200).

    According to Liddell Hart, “At the time we believed that the repulse of the Luftwaffe in the ‘Battle over Britain’ had saved her. That is only part of the explanation, the last part of it. The original cause, which goes much deeper, is that Hitler did not want to conquer England. He took little interest in the invasion preparations, and for weeks did nothing tospur them on; then, after a brief impulse to invade, he veered around again and suspended the preparations. He was preparing, instead, to invade Russia” (p140).

    David Irving in the foreword to his book The Warpath (1978) refers to “the discovery.. that at no time did this man (Hitler) pose or intend a real threat to Britain or the Empire.”

    This gives a completely different complexion, not only to the war, but to the successful suppression of this information during the war and afterwards. Historians today know only too well where the boundaries lie within which they can paint their pictures of the war and its aftermath, and the consequences of venturing beyond those boundaries, irrespective of the evidence. Unfortunately, only too few of them have been prepared to have the courage to break out of this dreadful straitjacket of official and unofficial censorship.

    E-mail comment received:

    I worked and studied in Berlin for three years, have an MA in International Relations and a BA in Government with a minor in History. I am embarrassed to say that until I read this article, I had no idea of the scope and cause for the anti-Semitism in Germany before WWII. The Halt Order at Dunkirk was never mentioned in my studies, nor was the ownership of the media, banks and businesses.

    Thank you for the excellent article. It certainly gives me a new perspective. I have always questioned the actual numbers of Jewish victims of the concentration camps, as the numbers didn’t make sense based upon Germany’s population. Perhaps it was fear of failing or being labeled an anti-Semite by my history professors (all but two were Jewish) and classmates that I refrained from demanding an honest discussion during my classes. I once said that the only reason Israel existed was out of Holocaust guilt, and I was immediately labeled a terrorist sympathizer.

    I see what is now happening in Israel and I am aghast. The parallels to WW II are frightening. Even today, one cannot bring up this subject without being labeled a Holocaust denier or white supremacist.

    Thanks again for an excellent article. I am forwarding it to several friends.

    JBP

    Comment by Jason Collett — November 21, 2007 #

16. To paraphrase Condaleeza Rice, ‘We have the guns, we decide what the truth is.’ The nuclear swords are honed. The future will be very bright. ha ha ha

    Comment by David Mende — November 21, 2007 #

17. For those of you ,curious to find out what happened in Russia during the period 1905-1989 the best source of information comes from Igor Bunich /Russian historian/.I will submit few links so the research can be possible:

    1.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Igor_Bunich

    2.http://lib.ru/HIST/BUNICH/zoloto.txt

    3.http://www.google.com/translate_t

    Comment by Dorian Nord — November 21, 2007 #

18. It has all been said before but no one listened then, so it all has to be said again.

    Alas, the only true final solution is a mass reduction of humaman population. Hopefully, the survivors have copies of the more balanced historical views.

    As long as the people cannot arm themselves, and not be persecuted for using them in self defense, IT WILL ALL HAVE TO BE SAID AGAIN.

    Comment by Lynn elpressiedente — November 21, 2007 #

19. Is it wrong for a home owner to lose all their possessions to a bank who uses inflation/money creation to steal said possessions and then to kill the thief?

    A few well armed victims of usuary banking dynasties, might well have changed history.

    That is why they keep us disarmed with gun control.

    The right to bear arms also gives one the right to use them.

    Slaves absolutely cant be armed. Are you armed?

    Comment by Lynn elpressiedente — November 21, 2007 #

20. Solzhenitsyn’s “Day in the Life of Ivan Denicovitch” is a great book. I read it as a school student, but now know much more about the historical conditions that gave rise to such terrible gulags.

    Long Live Mother Russia !

    Comment by Adam Neira — November 21, 2007 #

21. It is not surprising to have animosity against a group that flatly believes they are the “fruit of the vine” and the rest are, well, branches or manure I suppose. They have been happily straddling whether they are a race, religion or an ethnicity and use whichever one of those will get them the most advantage. As to the person who said the answer was world depopulation–quite to the contrary, the solution is enlightenment on who the actual possessors of money and power are, and who is using their influence suppressively. Cut the finance lines and they will have no power to do their evil.

    Comment by Joe Federov — November 21, 2007 #

22. Here’s another review of Solzhenitzen’s book, from Cathy Young at Reason Magazine:

    Solzhenitsyn, author of The Gulag Archipelago, was once a revered symbol of moral resistance to the Soviet state. He probably deserves more credit than any other person for stripping away communism’s moral prestige among Western intellectuals.

    Exiled from the Soviet Union in 1974, Solzhenitsyn alienated some erstwhile admirers with his Russian nationalism and his antipathy toward Western-style democracy; after his return to Russia 20 years later, the public’s reverence soon faded to polite indifference. Still, he retains his special status among the older intelligentsia and many Western anti-communists.

    Accusations of anti-Semitism are not new for Solzhenitsyn. Critics have long pointed to passages in The Gulag Archipelago that selectively list the Jewish last names of labor camp commandants. And Solzhenitsyn’s historical novel August 1914, published in English in 1972, emphasizes the Jewishness of Dmitry Bogrov, assassin of Russia’s reformist prime minister Pyotr Stolypin.

    Solzhenitsyn has claimed that he was merely telling it like it was, but August 1914 embellishes history considerably: While Bogrov was a thoroughly assimilated revolutionary from a family of third-generation converts, Solzhenitsyn saddles him with a Jewish first name, Mordko (a diminutive of Mordecai), and the fictitious motive of trying to undermine the Russian state to help the Jews.

    Then came the news that Solzhenitsyn was writing a major history of the Jews in Russia. The first volume of Dvesti let vmeste (Two Hundred Years Together), covering the period from 1795 to 1916, appeared in 2001; the second volume followed in 2003. According to Solzhenitsyn, the work was intended to give an objective and balanced account of Russian-Jewish relations: “I appeal to both sides — the Russians and the Jews — for patient mutual understanding and admission of their own share of sin.” This comment seems suspicious in itself, given that, for most of their history in Russia, Jews were victims of systematic oppression and violence. To talk about mutual guilt is a bit like asking blacks to accept their share of blame for Jim Crow.

    What does Solzhenitsyn see as the Jews’ share of sin? Mainly, their participation in revolutionary activities in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, and then in the Soviet government. He rejects claims that communism in Russia was the result of a Jewish plot but asserts that Jews played a “disproportionate role” in the creation of a terrorist state “insensitive to the Russian people and disconnected from Russian history.”

    Just what does “disproportionate” mean? Jews were overrepresented among the socialist revolutionaries, but as the historian Richard Pipes points out in The New Republic, they were also overrepresented among Russian capitalists. What’s more, says Pipes, “the ranks of the revolutionaries were certainly dominated by Russians.” A three-part series by Mark Deitch in the Russian daily Moskovskiy komsomolets last September noted that there were 43 Jews among the 300 major players on the Russian political scene in 1917 — and only 16 of them were Bolsheviks.

    Solzhenitsyn asserts that “the population of Russia, as a whole, regarded the new [revolutionary] terror as a Jewish terror” — and seeks, if not to validate, then at least to excuse this perception. Deitch subjects Solzhenitsyn’s account to a withering analysis. After quoting historian Lev Krichevsky’s statement that “in 1918, at the time of the Red Terror, ethnic minorities made up about 50 percent of the central staff of the Cheka [the secret police],” Solzhenitsyn adds that “Jews were quite prominent” among those minorities.

    But he omits Krichevsky’s actual data, which show that Jews made up less than 4 percent of the Cheka staff and held 8 percent of executive positions. On other occasions, though, Solzhenitsyn is not averse to exact numbers: He points out, for example, that six of the 12 Cheka investigators in the “department for the suppression of counter-revolution” were Jewish.

    An even more devastating critique of Solzhenitsyn’s oeuvre appeared in the U.S.-based Russian Jewish weekly Vestnik. The author, émigré journalist Semyon Reznik, analyzes a curious work self-published in Moscow in 2000 by one Anatoly Sidorchenko, a collection that includes two essays by Sidorchenko himself and one attributed to Solzhenitsyn, “Jews in the USSR and in the Future Russia.”

    In a June 2000 interview in Moscow News, Solzhenitsyn dismissed the publication as “a vile stunt by a mentally ill person.” Yet he failed to explicitly disavow his authorship — and a comparison between the essay (dated 1968) and Two Hundred Years Together reveals astonishing similarities, including entire paragraphs that are virtually identical.

    The major difference is that the essay abounds in passages that verge on overt Jew bashing. The second volume of Two Hundred Years Together mentions a band of “‘militant atheists’ led by Gubelman-Yaroslavsky” who trashed Russian Orthodox churches. The name Gubelman is the only reference to the man’s Jewishness. The corresponding passage in the 1968 essay reads: “The man who trashed Orthodox Christianity was Yemelyan Yaroslavsky — a Jew, Minei Izrailevich Gubelman.” It contains another line about Jews tramping through Christian churches with cigarettes in their teeth.

    Almost none of this has received any attention in the Western press. The first volume of Two Hundred Years Together, which has yet to be translated into English, has drawn mixed commentary, invariably accompanied by the qualification that Solzhenitsyn is obviously not anti-Semitic. “Solzhenitsyn, in fact, is not anti-Semitic; his books are not anti-Semitic, and he is not, in his personal relations, anti-Jewish,” David Remnick wrote in The New Yorker in August 2001.

    In The New Republic, Pipes wrote that while Solzhenitsyn is too eager to exonerate czarist Russia of mistreating its Jewish subjects, and as a consequence is sometimes insensitive to the latter’s predicament, “at least he absolves himself of the taint of anti-Semitism.”

    This sweeping exoneration is puzzling. As an example of Solzhenitsyn’s reverence for traditionalist Jews, Pipes quotes his assertion, “The preservation of the Jewish people for more than two thousand years in diaspora arouses amazement and respect.” Yet he omits the not-so-flattering next lines: “However, if we take a closer look: in some periods…this unity was achieved by the oppressive methods of the kagals [Jewish self-governing bodies], and one no longer knows if these methods should be respected simply because they stemmed from religious tradition. At least, for us Russians, even a small dose of such isolationism is treated as a repulsive fault.”

    Even stranger is an essay in the November 2002 History Today. There John Klier, a historian at London’s University College, describes the charges of anti-Semitism as “misguided.” Then he writes that in his account of the pogroms of the early 20th century, Solzhenitsyn is far more concerned with exonerating the good name of the Russian people than he is with the suffering of the Jews, and that on occasion he accepts the czarist government’s canards blaming the pogroms on provocations by the Jews themselves.

    And that’s not anti-Semitic? It’s doubtful that an American writer who took a similar attitude toward the lynchings in the South would be absolved of the taint of racism.

    How to explain this leniency? Perhaps it is simply too painful to consider that the great moral beacon of the communist days might be tainted with bigotry. But while the writer’s role in Soviet-era history undoubtedly deserves respect, that does not require blindness to his flaws.

    Solzhenitsyn’s anti-communism, it is increasingly clear, was never a defense of individual freedom. It was a defense of a different kind of collectivism: ethnic, religious, and traditionalist. This is far from the only time that such a mind-set — anti-secular, anti-modern, anti-individualist — has been linked to prejudice against those who don’t fit into the collective.

    Comment by SAC — November 21, 2007 #

23. Most of you are obviously a bunch of pitiful Nazi’s who, rather than focus on your own life and what you can do to make a positive contribution and fulfill a positive purpose, choose instead to project your failings on someone else, in your case, a group of people. There’s not a group of people in history that hasn’t been involved in some type of unsavory behavior, and no one has ever said that every Jew that ever lived was perfect. If you looked back far enough in history, you’d see that Jews became adept as merchants and business people because their oppressors during various periods prevented them from pursuing other ventures. Then, once they excelled in the professions in which they were forced to participate, they became a perceived threat to those who had either real or perceived incompetencies that prevented them from achieving their own success. If everyone just focused on their own business and what their divine purpose was, there would be little time for such insecurities and the pathetic, hateful behavior that ensues as a result of one’s own self-hatred.

    Comment by SAC — November 21, 2007 #

24. A book written by Robert Wilson, the Russian corrspondent The Times, 1920, claims that almost all the leaders of the Central Committee of the Boshevik Party, The Coucil of the People’s Commissars, and the Central Executive Committee were Jews or, like Stalin and Lenin, and later Molotov, Kruschev, Andropov, Brezhnev, and married to Jews. He lists thenm all by name and “race”. I think it was the last book he ever published. As Krushchev, once said, ” It was our form of insurance”. And to top it off, the so called revolution was sponsered by Jacob Schiff.

    Comment by Barrington James — November 21, 2007 #

25. SAC: “If you looked back far enough in history, you’d see that Jews became adept as merchants and business people because their oppressors during various periods prevented them from pursuing other ventures.”
    )
    Solzhenitsyn discusses this philosemitic canard at length in both the first tome and the second tome. The truth of the matter is that Czarist Russia tried and tried and tried to lure Jews away from their typically parasitic professions (like vodka-making, money-lending, owning pawnshops, inn-keeping, etc.) by offering them incentives such as free land, free tools, money to teach them how to farm, etc. However, such incentives proved useless as the Jews didn’t want to work the land and they weren’t very good at it. Generally speaking, Jews had a natural aversion to manual labour and preferred the easier methods of making money (and more lucrative methods) by exploiting the less sophisticated Russian peasantry. This is also why Czarist authorities instituted the Pale, i.e. a specific zone where Jews could live in the Russian Empire. It was done to protect the Russian peasant against the Jews’ depradations. Again, under the newly established Bolshevik regime, the Jews were encouraged to work the land, this time in the kolhozes but to no avail. Bolsheviks weren’t any more successful to make the Jews work the land than were the Czarist authorities.

    Comment by Friedrich Braun — November 21, 2007 #

26. Daily Express-Friday , March 24, 1933
    JUDEA DECLARES WAR ON GERMANY
    Brainwashing Christians and compensation pay by Christians,What stupidity after 60 million Christians death.

    Comment by Robert — November 21, 2007 #

27. re: F. Braun’s comment above: I don’t know where you got the “truth” you’re refering to in regards to the Jews treatment of the peasants, but history has shown that “the peasants” fared better when dealing with Jews than with any other group, and suggesting that Jews were sent to live in the Pale in order to protect the peasants is nothing but pure ignorance. And since when is it a crime to work in business instead of farming?Everyone has their talents and natural affinities. What is your problem with people being successful in business? Why do you have so much obvious resentment about this matter? Your manipulation of what Solzenhitsyn supposedly said, and your own small-minded prejudice is a truly sad thing to witness.

    Comment by SAC — November 21, 2007 #

28. Have you read Solzhenitsyn’s work on Russian Jews? No, you obviously haven’t, so it takes some chuzpah to call me “ignorant” on this topic. You have no idea how the Slavic population of the Russian Empire (and later under Judeo-Bolshevism) sufferred in its contact with Jewry. Secondly, if you want to post here you’ll refrain from calling me names.

    Comment by Friedrich Braun — November 21, 2007 #

29. Actually I find that Jews often try to claim THEY were victims of Stalin’s regime. As always twisting the truth to call the victims the perpetrators and themselves the eternal victims. Karma is going to be a bitch for these people.

    Comment by Steve Pallister — November 21, 2007 #

30. Solz is not the only man, nor the first, to bring up Jewry’s role in Russia. Hitler beat him to it.

    Comment by Emma Goldmann — November 21, 2007 #

31. I don’t even have to look to know there will be a few Zionist/Jewish shills trying to spin this. They are perennial as the grass, but far less attractive.

    Comment by Steve Pallister — November 21, 2007 #

32. Yep, just now, an EMMA GOLDMANN tries the subtle spin effect. The old Hitler Canard.

    well sweety so what? I guess that just shows Hitler was not wrong about everything. Actually scholars have long known the Jewish role in the atrocities in Russia.

    Just for you dear I shall point out that Jewish Zionists supported Hitler and not only allowed the so called holocaust of Jews to proceed, they actually encouraged it as a means to an end. The end being the theft of Palestine from the original historical inhabitants, by Khazars from eastern Europe who only converted to Judaism about 1000 years ago and who have NO claim to the historical Israel. The true semites are abused by these same Ashkenazi Jews today.

    ASHKENAZI, does anyone else ever wonder about the last four letters of their name?

    Comment by Steve Pallister — November 21, 2007 #

33. This is interesting. Something else that puzzles me is how Evangelical Christians support the Zionist state which follows a Talmud which says Jesus was a bastard, Mary a whore, and that HE is in hell boiling in excrement! That sure doesn’t sound Christian-friendly to me! What’s more, Daddy Bush signed a document saying that the new world religion should be Talmud-based! And that we should be ruled by Talmudic Law! What baloney! People, get your heads out of the sand and see what is REALLY going on! You are being HAD by sodomites and mammonites who are as Christian as Lucifer!

    Comment by Cat Callahan — November 21, 2007 #

34. The Jews are god’s chosen people.

    Comment by David Meyer — November 21, 2007 #

35. Some very interesting comments. I don’t know which came first, the chicken or the egg, in the vast round-robin of victimization between Jews and various groups of Gentiles. there is something very interesting as well in contrasting Jews; a wandering people with no homeland (until recently) who lived parasitically off of their host nations, and Romansch, or Gypsies, who are another wandering people with no homeland who live parasitically off of their host nations:

    To wit: There has always been fear and suspicion and prejudice against Gypsies, as well as against Jews, but it has never escalated to the same fever pitch and intensity of violence as it has against the Jews. Does anyone care to comment on this?

    Comment by Loch — November 21, 2007 #

36. “The Jews are god’s chosen people.”

    Mr. Meyer,

    Exactly which ‘god’ and ‘chosen’ for WHAT?

    Comment by Truth Seeker — November 21, 2007 #

37. Jews are always playing game of victims,,,it worked for the for many years abut it also gave them the Palestine that was stlen, and now with the USA thye have a patron and support to rob, steal and invade other countries. These monsters from Khazaria are not a real Jews….Must be sent to an island becuase they cannot live with Other Humans!

    Comment by Ava — November 21, 2007 #

38. Jews did 911 and all world wars. Jews run the Federal Reserve and will bring you Depression II as they did Depression I. Jew WWIII is imminent.
    Jews are parasites and like ticks on the body of humanity.
    http://www.Jew-Crime.com
    http://www.PatriotMilitia.com
    Name the Jackals of war and profits: JEWS

    Comment by PatriotMilitia.com — November 22, 2007 #

39. David Meyer forgot to write god correctly, “G_D”.
    “G_D’s” cosen were chosen by thenselves for themselves.
    I sense the rumblings of late night secret meetings and a simmer of panic for the “chosen” ones. The beginning of………..

    Comment by nic — November 22, 2007 #

40. ….and how will we all communicate when the internet is shutdown for don’t think for a minute zey will permit this type of chatter for much longer. Ideas someone please.

    Comment by nic — November 22, 2007 #

41. THE ‘INCORRECT’ SIX MILLION
    Alexander Solzhenitsyn, Nobel Prizewinner and author of The Gulag Archipelago, in a speech in Washington in 1975 had this to say of the Soviet system which was deemed worthy of recognition as one of ‘our’ Allies fighting ‘for Democracy’ against the ‘Dictators’ in WW2:

    “This was a system which, in time of peace, artificially created a famine causing SIX MILLION PERSONS to die in the Ukraine between 1932 and 1933. They died on the very threshold of Europe. And Europe didn’t even notice it. The world didn’t even notice it. SIX MILLION PERSONS!”

    (Alexander Solzhenitsyn Speaks to the West (1978) p 16)

    Who were these people, and why was and is their fate unknown to the ordinary man in the street in western countries?

    Franklin Roosevelt’s ally and associate Joseph Stalin was the supreme dictator of Russia for almost a quarter of a century, from 1929 until his death in 1953. Born as Iosif Djugashvili, he adopted the very indicative name ‘Stalin’, ‘man of steel’. He lived up to this name in every respect. Soviet Russia under Stalin was a despotic police state that relied on espionage and terror, with a profound gulf in manner of living between the rulers and the ruled.

    Stalin’s first Five-Year Plan (1928-1932) sought to bring about the ‘collectivization of agriculture’ in accordance with the ‘abolition of property in land’ put forward in Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto. But back in 1861 Czar Alexander II had liberated 23 million serfs, four years before slavery was abolished in the United States. In the period before the Revolution, millions of these peasants had been enabled to get title to their own individual plots, boosting Russian agricultural productivity. These independent peasant farmers became known as kulaks. When Communism was imposed on Russia, the kulaks as private property owners now stood in the way of the idea of Communism. In 1929 Stalin called for ‘the liquidation of the kulaks’, and their small family farms, animals, implements and crops were declared to belong to the state. “(The Jews) Trotsky, Zinoviev and Kamenev had always argued that the peasant would never surrender enough food voluntarily, and must be coerced and, if need be, crushed” (*Paul Johnson A History of the Modern World (1983) p 268). The Red Army and the GPU secret police were used to implement the policy. All peasants who resisted were treated with violence. A very large number were killed or sent in cattle or freight trains to exile in remote areas in the frozen north or the desert steppes. Rather than give up their animals to the collective farms, many peasants killed and ate them. As a result, the number of farm animals in the Soviet Union was catastrophically reduced:

    1928
    1933

    Cattle
    30,7 million
    19,6 million

    Sheep and goats
    146,7 million
    50,2 million

    Hogs
    26 million
    12,1 million

    Horses
    33,5 million
    16,6 million

    (*Quigley, Tragedy and Hope, p 398).

    The peasants stopped farming on ground that suddenly, officially, no longer belonged to them. As a result, food production decreased drastically. After a while, the cities started running out of food. Orders were given for grain to be confiscated from the peasants, whether they had sufficient for themselves and their families or not. Those caught trying to reserve food for their families were ‘severely dealt with’. By the winter of 1932-3, virtually no food was left in the countryside. By early March 1933, ‘death on a mass scale really began’ (Robert Conquest, The Harvest of Sorrow (1986) p243). The main farming areas of Russia, in the regions of the Ukraine and North Caucasus, were utterly devastated. Millions of people were forced to eat anything that was available, mice, rats, birds, grass, nettles, bark and even cats and dogs, but even then did not survive. It was a time of great and terrible hunger, a catastrophic man-made famine.

    The American journalist Eugene Lyons was sent to Russia in 1928 as chief correspondent for the United Press agency. Arriving as an enthusiastic communist, he was able to experience the Soviet experiment at first hand. He became extremely disillusioned. He described the famine in his book Assignment in Utopia (published in 1937) in the following terms:

    “Hell broke loose in seventy thousand Russian villages.. A population as large as all of Switzerland’s or Denmark’s was stripped clean of all their belongings.. They were herded with bayonets at railroad stations, packed indiscriminately into cattle cars and freight cars and dumped weeks later in the lumber regions of the frozen North, the deserts of central Asia, wherever labor was needed, there to live or die..”. The number of people that died is unknown, but the famine alone is estimated conservatively to have been responsible for 6 million deaths, almost half of them children (*Conquest, p 303-4). Other millions died from the killings and sickness as a result of the deportations (*p 304-7). At the famous Yalta conference in 1945, Winston Churchill was able to question his friend and fellow ally Stalin about the process. Stalin said ‘ten million’ had been ‘dealt with’, but that it had been ‘absolutely necessary’. Churchill records that he ’sustained the strong impression of millions of men and women being blotted out or displaced forever’ (*Churchill, The Second World War, vol. IV p448). However Churchill – thank God for Winston Churchill - had no further comment to make on the matter. Controlling the agenda is always so important!

    Lyons, himself Jewish, credits the Jewish commissar Lazar Kaganovich with the major portion of responsibility for this major crime against humanity:

    “Lazar Kaganovich… it was his mind that invented the Political Departments to lead collectivized agriculture, his iron hand that applied Bolshevik mercilessness.” (*Lyons, p 578). The Encyclopaedia Britannica says tersely, “(Kaganovich) was one of the small group of Stalin’s top advisors pushing for very high rates of collectivization after 1929.. Within the Politburo, Kaganovich and Molotov led the opposition to Kirov’s proposed concessions to the peasantry and to his attempts to relax the harshness of Stalin’s control.. (Kaganovich) opposed Krushchev’s de-Stalinization..”. Kaganovich died at the ripe old age of 98 in 1991 (Encl. Brit.), ethnically safe from pursuit by the Israeli secret service, the Simon Wiesenthal organization, the New York media-intelligentsia or other hunters of real or imagined war criminals or human rights violators.

    The suffering caused by the great man-made famine was covered by some reports in newspapers in Britain, Europe and the United States. Books dating from before World War Two can still be found in second-hand bookshops which describe the ferocity… Arthur Koestler, Soviet Myth and Reality in The Yogi and the Commissar (1945) Muggeridge, Lyons, Chamberlin… Yet this episode has been completely, entirely, totally ignored by our guardians of history, morality and political correctness…

    NO MEMORIAL EXISTS IN WASHINGTON DC

    (obviously) to record the indescribable scale of human suffering which resulted, undoubtedly because such a high burden of responsibility for it lies with the Jew Kaganovitch, and because the victims were not Jewish. No chance exists for such a monument, according to a private consensus, owing to certain political realities.

    This six million is the ‘incorrect’ six million, because their inconvenient story is not and has not been useful to today’s elite. The tribal affiliations of the chief perpetrator (Jew) and the victims (non-Jews) are the wrong ones, not fitting into the ‘correct’ pattern.

    According to Solzhenitsyn in the eighty years that preceded the Revolution in Russia, - years of revolutionary activity, uprisings and the assassination of a Czar, an average of ten persons a year were executed. After the Revolution, in 1918 and 1919, according to the figures of the Cheka, the secret police itself - more than a thousand persons were executed per month without trial. In 1937-8, at the height of Stalin’s terror, more than 40 000 persons were executed per month. (*Solzhenitsyn p17).

    Millions of persons were executed or sent to labour camps. In his magnum opus The Gulag Archipelago, Solzhenitsyn credits Naftaly Frenkel, a ‘Turkish-born Jew’, with being works chief / chief overseer of the one-hundred-and-forty-mile-long Belomor (Baltic-White Sea) canal, built entirely with slave labour (paperback edition, vol 2 p 72). Solzhenitsyn quotes the official Soviet history of the project which describes Frenkel as having ‘..the eyes of an interrogator and prosecutor.. A man with enormous love of power and pride, for whom the main thing is unlimited power. If it is necessary for him to be feared, then let him be feared. He spoke harshly to the engineers, attempting to humiliate them.’ (ibid p 75). Other Jews were also involved in influential positions. Yakov Rappoport was deputy chief of construction (p 78) and Matvei Berman was the Chief of Gulag (p 79). Frenkel, Berman and Rappoport are amongst six men described by Solzhenitsyn as ‘hired murderers’, ‘each of whom accounted for thirty thousand lives’ (p 91). Is Solzhenitsyn alone in his accusations? Why are these names generally unknown to ordinary citizens in the West?

    “The major role Jewish leaders played in the November (Russian) revolution was probably more important than any other factor in confirming (Hitler’s) anti-Semitic beliefs.” (J&S Pool, Who Financed Hitler, p.164).

    “There has been a tendency to circumvent or simply ignore the significant role of Jewish intellectuals in the German Communist Party, and thereby seriously neglect one of the genuine and objective reasons for increased anti-Semitism during and after World War 1.. The prominence of Jews in the revolution and early Weimar Republic is indisputable, and this was a very serious contributing cause for increased anti-Semitism in post-war years.. It is clear then that the stereotype of Jews as socialists and communists.. led many Germans to distrust the Jewish minority as a whole and to brand Jews as enemies of the German nation.” (Sarah Gordon Hitler, Germans and the ‘Jewish Question’ Princeton University Press (1984) p 23).

    “The second paroxysm of strong anti-Semitism came after the critical role of Jews in International Communism and the Russian Revolution and during the economic crises of the 1920s and 30s… Anti-Semitism intensified throughout Europe and North America following the perceived and actual centrality of Jews in the Russian Revolution.. Such feelings were not restricted to Germany, or to vulgar extremists like the Nazis. All over Northern Europe and North America, anti-Semitism became the norm in ‘nice society’, and ‘nice society’ included the universities.” (Bernal, Black Athena vol. 1 pp. 367, 387).

    “To many outside observers, the Russian revolution looked like a Jewish conspiracy, especially when it was followed by Jewish-led revolutionary outbreaks in much of central Europe. The leadership of the Bolshevik Party had a preponderance of Jews and included Litvinov (real name Wallach), Liadov (Mandelshtam), Shklovsky, Saltz, Gusev (Drabkin), Zemliachka (Salkind), Helena Rozmirovich, Serafima Gopner, Yaroslavsky (Gubelman), Yaklovlev (Epstein), Riaznov (Goldendach), Uritsky and Larin. Of the seven members of the Politburo, the inner cabinet of the country, four, Trotsky (Bronstein), Zinoviev (Radomsky), Kamenev (Rosenfeld) and Sverdlov, were Jews.”

    When Lenin died in 1924, Zinoviev - the first chairman of the Communist International - formed a triumvirate with Kamenev and Stalin to govern Russia. This ‘Troika’ as it was known was formed to keep Trotsky from the succession. Stalin was the only one of the three members of the Troika who was not Jewish. “Though Zinoviev and Kamenev feared Trotsky as too militant and extreme, they shared his belief in permanent revolution, which Stalin did not. Russia had been in almost continuous turmoil for twenty years and had suffered revolutions and counter-revolutions, war, invasions and a pitiless and drawn-out civil war. There were limits to which the endurance of a people could be stretched. The Russians wanted to bury their dead and resume what they could of normal life. Stalin understood this. Trotsky, Zinoviev and Kamenev (the three Jews) did not.”

    “Jews had a prominent role in Communist parties elsewhere..” (Chaim Bermant, The Jews (1977)).

    Comment by Jason — November 22, 2007 #

42. My Favorite Elie Wiesel Stories

    .. She explained that she had taken classes in Holocaust studies at Harvard and felt she had a good background on the subject. I wasn’t talking to someone who was in the dark about what the Holocaust had been. I wanted to know what texts were followed in her classes but somehow she was unable to name them. She did recall the name of Raul Hilberg, and I was able to give her the title of his book, The Destruction of the European Jews.

    “But the writer who influenced me most is Elie Wiesel.”

    “Is that right?” I said. “We have something in common then. I don’t know who has influenced me more in the way I regard Holocaust literature than Elie Wiesel.”

    “Is that right?” she said enthusiastically, turning in her seat toward me.

    “He’s not a historian though, is he?”

    She considered the question thoughtfully, “Not in a strict sense.”

    I told her some of my favourite Elie Wiesel stories. I started with the one where he writes that there is evidence that when some Russians were executed at Babi Yar in Ukraine that the cadavers of those who were Jews, in a unique protest against their ill treatment, spurted geysers of blood from their graves for months after they were buried.

    “He wrote that in Jews of Silence,” I said, “In a straight book of journalism about Soviet Jews and the refusal of the State to allow them to emigrate. Its not a book of poetry, straight journalism. What do you think about a man who would repeat such a claim? Wiesel writes in long hand in French. His wife translates his stuff into English. Presumably Wiesel goes over the translation. The translation is typeset and presumably Wiesel goes over the galleys. When he claims that the Jewish cadavers spurt geysers of blood from their graves for months after they were buried it isn’t a slip of the pen. Wiesel believes that it’s a credible story. He wants you and me to believe it’s credible. He wants the kids he teaches at Boston University to believe it’s credible. It isn’t only that Wiesel is not a historian. There may be other things as well that he is not. He may not be wrapped too tight, for example.”

    The girl didn’t say anything.

    I told her some more of Elie Wiesel stories. I took them largely from his recommended reading list of survivor eyewitness testimonies. I told them as amusingly as I could, and as gently as I could. As I went along I introduced a few observations about the gas chamber stories from a Revisionist perspective. Occasionally she would smile or ask a question, but as I talked on she grew increasingly silent. After three or four hundred miles I had the feeling I had said enough, but I couldn’t stop myself. The longer I talked the more investment I had in wanting her to see what good sense I was making.

    I told her about how Wiesel especially recommends the eyewitness testimony of Yankiel Wiernik as evidence for the gas chambers at Treblinka and the extermination there of about a million Jews. I told her how Wiernik claims that he saw with his own eyes how the cadavers of pregnant Jewish women that had been exterminated would burst open while they were being cremated…their bellies would burst open…and that inside their wombs you could see their fetuses burning like torches.

    I said, “Here is the question I think Elie Wiesel’s students should pose to him: As the Americans and the British each specialized in burning alive German and Japanese women by the ten thousands in mass terror bombings, and as there are no reports that pregnant German or Japanese women were able to mount such displays with their own wombs and fetuses while their own bodies were in flames, as Yankiel Wiernik – is Elie Wiesel – suggesting that only Jewish ladies have the talent for it? What is it that Wiesel is attempting to suggest when he recommends Wiernik’s eyewitness testimony to his students at Boston University? What does he reveal about his standards for historical objectivity? What does he reveal about his inner life?”

    At that moment the girl took her head in both hands, put her face on her knees and moaned: “I just feel like I’m being proselytized,” she said. She shook her head slowly from side to side, still holding it in both hands, doubled over in her seat.

    http://www.codoh.com

    extract from Confessions of a Holocaust Revisionist
    By Bradley R. Smith

    Comment by Jason — November 22, 2007 #

43. Zionist chutzpah -
    Elie Wiesel vs Encyclopaedia Britannica

    Wiesel has been a prominent spokesman for the very sizeable group of people known as Holocaust survivors. [According to Norman Finkelstein of the City University of New York in his book The Holocaust Industry published in 2000, ‘The Israeli Prime Minister’s office recently put the number of “living Holocaust survivors” at nearly a million’ (p.83)]. Wiesel has chaired the US Holocaust Memorial Council and has been the recipient of a Congressional Gold Medal and Nobel Peace Prize (sic).

    Time Magazine, March 18 1985:

    ‘How had he survived two of the most notorious killing fields [Auschwitz and Buchenwald] of the century? “I will never know” he says. “I was always weak. I never ate. The slightest wind would turn me over. In Buchenwald they sent 10,000 to their deaths every day. I was always in the last hundred near the gate. They stopped. Why?”

    Compare this with Encyclopaedia Britannica (1993), under ‘Buchenwald’:

    “In World War II it held about 20,000 prisoners.. Although there were no gas chambers, hundreds perished monthly through disease, malnutrition, exhaustion, beatings and executions.”

    [

    http://www.washington-report.org/backissues/0199/9901055.html

    Washington Report on Middle East Affairs | January/February 1999

    “A Terrible Fraud” :
    Wiesel Ignores Palestinians
    To the Jerusalem Post, Oct. 9, 1998 (as submitted).

    (from Prof. Daniel McGowan, Professor of Economics at Hobart and William Smith Colleges, Geneva, NY)

    In your Oct. 9 article on Elie Wiesel, the American icon of Holocaust survivors, he is paid a special tribute as a “speaker of truth.” This is the same Elie Wiesel who is continually referred to by Noam Chomsky and others as “a terrible fraud.” What can explain such disparity of opinion?

    Perhaps it is because Wiesel, who has written literally volumes Against Silence, remains silent when it comes to such issues involving Palestinians as land expropriation, torture and abrogation of basic human rights.

    Perhaps it is because Elie Wiesel proclaims with great piety that “the opposite of love is not hate; it is indifference,” while he remains totally indifferent to the inequality and suffering of the Palestinians. Perhaps it is because he enjoys recognition as “one of the first opponents of apartheid” in South Africa, while he remains totally silent and indifferent to the apartheid being practiced today in Israel.

    Perhaps it is because he decries terrorism, yet never apologizes for the terrorism perpetrated by the Irgun at Deir Yassin on April 9, 1948. He refuses even to comment on it. He dismisses this act of terrorism in eight short words in his memoirs, All Rivers Run to the Sea. He remembers the Jewish victims at Kielce, Poland (July 1946) with great anguish, but ignores twice as many Palestinian victims of his own employer at Deir Yassin. The irony is breathtaking.

    It is even more shocking that the world’s best known Holocaust survivor can repeatedly visit Yad Vashem and yet keep silent about the victims of Deir Yassin who lie within his sight 1,400 meters to the north. He bitterly protests when Jewish graves are defaced, but has nothing to say when the cemetery of Deir Yassin is bulldozed. He refuses even to acknowledge repeated requests that he join a group of Jews and non-Jews who wish to build a memorial at Deir Yassin.

    Elie Wiesel may profess modesty and claim he is “not a symbol of anything” but, unfortunately, he has become a symbol of hypocrisy.

    Daniel A. McGowan, Director, Deir Yassin Remembered, Geneva, NY

    Comment by Jason — November 22, 2007 #

44. Solz. explains a great many things: US open borders, the housing bubble, Israeli foreign aid, congressmen’s allegiance to AIPAC, the falling dollar, inflation, media control with a slant against whites. It has never been about Israel. It’s about taking over the US. It’s a persuasive device called diversion. “Keep your eye on the ball,” but it’s the wrong ball.

    Comment by hdugan — November 22, 2007 #

45. I would like to see this book made avaialble on line in English tranmslation, as is the case with Eustace Mullins’ seminal work on `The Secrets of the Federal Reserve’.
    http://www.the7thfire.com/Politics%20and%20History/Secrets_of_the_Federal_Reserve/secrets_of_the_federal_reserve_TC.htm

    As an old commie (now a decidly maverick commie) I had no idea that Paul Warburg (Rothschilds’ agent in the creation of the Fed) had a brother Max Warburg that was head of German intel, that let Lenin through on the sealed train.

    Comment by Adam Ghaznavi — November 22, 2007 #

46. Several Russian friends told me about Solzhenitsyn ’s book on the Jews in early 2001 and again in 2003.I have ordered the French edition. Italians of the left have abstained from any comments or reviews on his book. I am endeavoring to find out if an Italian translation exists. The former PM Berlusconi who is Catholic or claims to be one, received a medal from the ACLU. There you are. The Media Czar does not mind saying publicly that he may be a cuckold - but no one in his vast media empire is allowed to even hint at this book. I have written a book on Reinhard Heydrich, “Checkmate: The Enigma of Reinhard Heydrich . Some editors said it was an exciting and thrilling book but too complicated and controversial. Note that they read only 30 pages of the book. However, Catholic bashing is fine, even if the work is mediocre and full of errors. I am referring to The Da Vinci Code. I put it down after page ten.Contessa Isabella von Vacani

    Comment by Contessa Isabella von Vacani — November 22, 2007 #

47. It seems to me that it is so easy to blame group or race or creed or a particular religion. If only love and empathy can be replaced in the human heart instead of power, wealth and sex. These three are good i.e. a knife is used to cut bread yet it also can be used to kill a human being. It is the energy behind the “tool” that is being used for good or evil. Will we ever learn to get along? Will we ever live in peace, harmony and love? Or is it in our nature that we must subjugate others in order to “feel free” ourselves? Will we all be enlightened somehow and someway some day? I sure hope so… My parents lived through that time frame in Russia and Ukraine during those terrible days… I hear many jews complain about the holocaust yet what happened in Russia, Ukraine, Eastern Europe and China when 10’s of mlllions died for a cause of an ideology? Why is there no monument to those souls? Why is it so weakly mentioned even in history books? Must not be important enough.. or doesn’t fit with the agenda… whose agenda? At times I can’t even plan out my own life to cause things to happen the way I want to… so how do you plan millions of people’s life? There is a much deeper mystery here that we are not able to perceive… or know… something to think about… Long live the people that seek peace, love and harmony on this small “spaceship” we call Earth…

    Comment by Andrew Rady — November 22, 2007 #

48. Comment by Andrew Rady — November 22, 2007 #

    Read the TALMUD here; http://www.come-and-hear.com/dilling/dcontents.html and you will be shocked to find out that anyone other than a jew is considered as cattle. Whilst this mentality is abound there will never be any peace. History as witness.

    Comment by nic — November 22, 2007 #

49. “I have written a book on Reinhard Heydrich, “Checkmate: The Enigma of Reinhard Heydrich .”
    )
    Where can one see it or purchase it?

    Comment by Friedrich Braun — November 22, 2007 #

50. But what is the motive? What did the Jews gain from the revolution?

    Comment by richard s — November 22, 2007 #

51. Jewry’s situation improved exponentially following the Revolution. They found themselves at the helm of an imperial superpower…sounds familiar?

    Comment by Friedrich Braun — November 22, 2007 #

52. Time for a real change. It is up to us to not deal with these individuals. Cut them off at every turn. Then then wither on the vine.

    Comment by Time for Change — November 22, 2007 #

53. “”"To wit: There has always been fear and suspicion and prejudice against Gypsies, as well as against Jews, but it has never escalated to the same fever pitch and intensity of violence as it has against the Jews. Does anyone care to comment on this?”"”

    Comment by Loch

    That is really quite simple. Jewish (Israeli) crimes against humanity are escalating and are so gross these dyas and thanks to the internet in particular no longer can be hidden with a controlled and compliant press.

    In other words the answer is, THEY DESERVE IT!!

    Comment by Steve Pallister — November 22, 2007 #

54. The history of how WWII came about is available for anyone to find out - even without reading Mr. Solzhenitsyn, looking up old news articles. It is been truly amazing to me that no one ever mentions the 30 million murdered by Bohlshevism, yet the holocaust is rammed down our throat at every opportunity. The same forces are at work today. As long as people allow themselves to be incited by others hatred and greed, they will be used to serve those people’s purposes. What we must try to realize is that the Bohlshevick’s are the same as the Zionists of today (and that could be a Jewish person or a Christian). Because Zionism uses Judeaism to serve its purpose which is rather ugly. Zionism developed out the World Jewish Congress which first organized in 1892 - how interesting. Mr. Herztel (who is called the father of israel), wanted to find a place for the Jewish people of European desent (Khazar’s). This is where the split in the Jewish Congress came in because some were willing to accept land not in the Middle East at all. I don’t think Uroguay would have appreciated the world dividing its land up for an outside group anymore than Palestine did. As for the God’s chosen people and his promising a specific geographic parcel of land to this people, it is rather laughable. When I am told that I reply, “So, God is a real estate agent?” This chosen business is a very human thought and not God-like at all. The greatest power in the Universe does not work in that manner at all. Ultimately, we are being hurdled toward the next round of fiscal ruin and world war by the same groups that brought us all the worlds previous conflagrations. We can say it is their fault, but it is the masses that allow them to do their work. Because those with no desire for truth are easily swayed, incited to anger and hatred, controlled with the threat of their easy lives going away - no food, no water, no way to get ahead. So, it is important to know the real history that has brought us to today. But it is most important not to allow ourselves to be used as pawns to participate in repeating the same mistakes that keep being made throughout history.

    Comment by Frances — November 23, 2007 #

55. Richards s:

    What they gained? It was western banks who financed the bolsheviks. I.e. international bankers, who use socialism to partly put states in debt, and partly to secure their interest paybacks to the banks.

    Its a system that intenrational bankers tried, and still try to use to concentrate wealth under the false premise of “peace, equality and well-being” etc

    Comment by A8L — November 23, 2007 #

56. This is for Mr.Friedrich Braun. In reference to your question about ‘Checkmate: The Enigma of Reinhard Heydrich. Thank you for asking. I am considering several options. One: to publish it myself and link up with a marketing and distribution network, Two: to publish in Shanghai in Mandarin. I won’t get paid much. Who cares? More than three hundred million people will read it. Let’s not forget the rest of Asia. I am negotiating with a publisher in Venezuela. I can also publish by installments at a distinguished internet site. The so called Czech patriots the British SOE parachuted into Bohemia/Moravia to kill Heydrich were more faithful to Stalin than to Benes. They failed to kill him. He lived an agonizing 6 days where he fought septicemia and God knows what other biochemical attacks until his death. Hitler was so distraught over the death of his designated heir that he could not speak more than a few words at his funeral oration. If you would like to read some chapters, please contact the webmaster of this forum for my email address. Contessa Isabella von Vacani

    Comment by Contessa Isabella von Vacani — November 23, 2007 #

57. I’m the webmaster and this is my blog. If you send me a copy of the book (or selections), I’m prepared to review it. I’ll send you an email.

    Comment by Friedrich Braun — November 23, 2007 #

58. Want to cutoff support of the Zionists? Dr.Ron Paul for President 2008.Educate yourself on his agenda of Peace.Our freedom and national identity depend on it.

    Comment by William Tucker — November 23, 2007 #

59. Reflecting on the amount of traffic my little review of Solzhenitsyn’ work on Jewry got, I think that there’s a real hunger out there for uncensored history.

    Comment by Friedrich Braun — November 23, 2007 #

60. Support

    http://www.halturnershow.com

    Comment by Cliff — November 24, 2007 #

61. The Russian Revolution cover up has begun. The obvious question would be: Who else but the Jews would have the reasons, the ability, the resources and the drive to create the revolution? No One.

    According to Robert Wilton, the Russian correspondent of the London Times in the 1920’s, almost all the decision makers of the Revolution were Jews. As Khrushchev said, “We were either a Jew or married to a Jew. It was our insurance.” Lenin, Stalin, Molotov, Khrushchev,Brezhnev,and Andropov, for example were all married to Jews and most of them raised their children Jewish.

    So were every leader of the KGB from Beria to Kaganovich.

    Wilton states in a book written in 1920 ( his last book) that nine of the twelve members of the Central Committee of the Bolshevik party were Jewish, except for Lenin and two others, 42 out of the 57 members of the Council of the People’s Commissars were Jewish, and 24 out of 36 members of the Extraordinary Commission of Moscow were also Jewish.

    I think it is common knowledge that two of the biggest financial supporters of the revolution were the Jews Jacob Schiff and Olaf Ashberg.

    On the fip side of the revolution, Lenin was shot by the Jew Fannie Kaplan. He died a terrible death of lead poisonning a few years later.

    I hope I get to read Solzhenitsyn’s book but I am not counting on it.

    Comment by Barrington James — November 24, 2007 #

62. Cliff: ask Hal Turner to do a special on Solzhenitsyn’s work on Jewry and why we still don’t have an English translation.

    Comment by Friedrich Braun — November 24, 2007 #

63. “On the fip side of the revolution, Lenin was shot by the Jew Fannie Kaplan. He died a terrible death of lead poisonning a few years later.”
    )
    Actually, Solzhenitsyn disputes in his work that Kaplan shot Lenin but doesn’t really get into it. As to Lenin’s ailments, he died of syphilys.

    Comment by Friedrich Braun — November 24, 2007 #

64. I’m still looking for Mr Meyer’s response to Truth Seeker’s question. Maybe he forgot…I’ll try again: Mr Meyer, who’s god are the Jews chosen for, and for what are they chosen?

    Look up Noahide Nations and you will see what the self-described “chosen” believe they’re chosen for. The mission for all Jews is to prepare the Gentile world for a world ruled by Jewish Law–or “to build a dwelling for G-d in the lower realms”. Mr Meyer can’t tell you the “chosen” are to rule the world (”the nations”) under the jackboot of Torah and Talmudic Law. FYI, “the nations” are the 99% of countries that are not Israel. Here’s the “minimum” they’ve drawn up for the unchosen (they’ll show us the fine print in due time):

    http://www.noahide.com/minimum.htm

    So how is it possible that every action by “white supremacist” groups is splashed across the front pages of every newspaper and television screen, while Jewish supremacist groups numbering in the hundreds of thousands with representatives at the highest levels of Jewish organizations around the world are COMPLETELY IGNORED by the “press”?

    Perhaps you can explain this, Mr Meyer?

    [BTW, forget about trying to place me in some racist group. White supremacists are pinheads.]

    Comment by Peasant — November 24, 2007 #

65. With respect, after reading through other notes I think a few things need to be said:

    – This holocaust revision crap plays right into the Zionists hands. I wouldn’t be surprised if they started it. That “historical review” conference in Iran was fucking idiotic, and only served to bolster the Zionist’s “antisemitism” defense (which is all they have). People have to focus on the obvious, indisputable Zionist crimes happening today.

    – The people financing the neocon “think tanks”, propaganda outlets (known as the media), foundations, globalist orgs, etc… are Zionist billionaires who got filthy rich by raping the poor. Subprime lenders, vulture hedge fund managers, HMO execs, oligarchs, arms dealers, currency “traders”, etc… Most American non-profits have some Zionist funding, as do most of the top “news” websites from the neocon Little Green Footballs to the left gatekeepers like Counterpunch and Alternet. They have extraordinary reach and power and should not be taken lightly.

    – People who advocate violence are either Zionist shills or fools. The truth is the best weapon… Their lies are stacked too high and destined to collapse. I’m stunned they’ve gotten as far as they have…but more people see it now. It’s about fucking time!

    –There are several Zionists in local and regional leadership positions in the Ron Paul campaign (and every other campaign). But Ron Paul supporters are shrewder than most and won’t put up with any bullshit. Some are completely paranoid, which is understandable. They are the salt of the American earth, in my humble opinion, and I’m proud to be with them.

    Comment by Peasant — November 24, 2007 #

66. Peasant, what would you advocate after voting fails and the free flow of info on the internet is choked off? You are aware this is going to happen, right?

    As for Hal Turner, I doubt he would even know who Solzhenitsyn is. Probably would think it’s the Russian equivalent to gesundheit, or at least his listeners would.

    Comment by Orion14 — November 25, 2007 #

67. Orion14,

    I think we have to be much more creative. Voting can’t fail if everyone records their vote at the polls in a way that cannot be “lost”. How about taking a snapshot or video of ballots before submitting them, or recording every voter on video, or both? If we don’t do something like this, the fascists will definitely “rearrange” votes as needed.

    I can’t see how they can choke off the internet without declaring complete martial law and shutting down all phone and wireless communications. If that’s the scenario, it’s a whole different ball game. That will take another, much larger mass murder in the U.S. (orchestrated by the govt again) to install their “emergency govt”. Until then, they can’t do much–especially after criticizing China for their censorship.

    Comment by Peasant — November 25, 2007 #

68. I have a great interest in affirmative action because it totally destroyed my life and made me virtually unemployable.

    I have read every federal and every state of california affirmative action lawsuit going back to 1964. Not on google, not little summaries in law books but every piece of paper filed with every affirmative action lawsuit.

    If you go to the clerks’ office where lawsuits are filed, you will find attached to every lawsuit the names of all the lawyers involved.

    This is done so that the clerks can send out copies of new papers filed in the suit. As the suits drag on through appeals etc, the list of lawyers gets quite long.

    I have read all those lists of anti White anti Male affirmative action lawyers.

    And about 80 percent of the names of the anti White lawyers are obviously Jewish. I don’t count names like Kaufmann and Becker or any other name that could be either German or Jewish.

    So when you get denied a promotion because you are White, when you are denied employment because you are White, when your children are denied college admission and later employment because they are White, bear in mind just who filed and won all those affirmative action lawsuits.

    Comment by Margaret Taft — November 25, 2007 #

69. Does anyone know how the original Rothschild Nathan got his wealth? He embezzled it from the funds his employer, the Landgrave of Hesse lent to the American revolution via the French.

    The Grand Dukes of Hesse (Frankfort area) were the richest royal family in Europe. They made their money not by going to war, but lending money for wars and renting soldiers for wars.

    Hesse had one of the first protestant welfare states, with free food, good wages and low cost housing to encourage early marriage and a high birthrate.

    The goal was lots of little boys who would soon grow into soldiers and lots of little girls to give birth to the next generation of soldiers.

    As well as lending money for warfare, the Grand Dukes rented the Hessian soldiers to other nations.

    In the American revolution, the Grand Duke rented soldiers to fight on the English side. He lent money to the French to lend to the Americans. So the Grand Duke and his agent Rothschild made money from both sides of the war.

    At the beginning of the American revolution Nathan was just very rich. But he embezzled vast amounts of money during the transfer from Frankfort to France.

    By the end of the American revolution Rothschild was one of the richest men in Europe. That was how the Rothschilds got the money to send the 5 sons to different European capitals.

    The Rothschild fortune was founded on a massive embezzlement.

    Comment by Cynic — November 25, 2007 #

70. “But what is the motive? What did the Jews gain from the revolution?”

    Comment by richard s — November 22, 2007

    They have ruled Russia with its vast population, resources and size since 1918. That is a pretty good gain.

    Comment by Cynic — November 25, 2007 #

71. “He remembers the Jewish victims at Kielce, Poland (July 1946) with great anguish,”

    That so called massacre was carried out by Polish communists who had stayed safe and sound in Russia during WW2 training to take over Poland after the war.

    They were Jews as well as communists. Their purpose was to create the impression that the Poles were evil neo nazis as responsible for Auschwitz and the so called holocaust as the Germans were.

    The whole thing was to make the Poles look bad so that the United States would not intervene when the Russians made Poland into a slave territory.

    A lesser motive was to frighten European Jews into moving to Israel.

    Comment by Cynic — November 25, 2007 #

72. The best answer to all of this lies in a healthy contempt for the human race. It is made up of crooks, suckers, and lazy cowards. There are Jewish crooks, Jewish suckers, and Jewish lazy cowards. That applies to Catholics, Republicans and every other group. The suckers defend the crooks in their midst. But, these is usually a small number who somehow preserve and display the dismal facts. Many of them are Jewish. There isn’t a single human group that doesn’t believe that it is one of the “chosens”. That sort of pride is their main weakness.

    Comment by John Hanks — November 30, 2007 #

73. […] Read the rest: Link […]

    Pingback by National-Socialist Party of Canada » Blog Archive » Alexander Solzhenitsyn and the Jews — December 2, 2007 #

74. It’s in russian but I guess some of You can master it. That webpage shows how jews treated russians and other people after 1917 coup.

    http://www.gulag.ipvnews.org/

    Comment by excubitoris — December 3, 2007 #

75. […] Also: Alexander Solzhenitsyn on the Jews and the USSR […]

    Pingback by The Ukrainian Holocaust: Did You Even Know? « INCOG MAN: Sick of all the BS, anymore… — December 3, 2007 #

76. Looks like INCOG MAN in that pingback above has a good web-site. I just added it to my favorites after browsing it a bit. I’ll be returning to it in future for more thorough study.

    Comment by Fred Scrooby — December 3, 2007 #

77. […] Soviet archives (opened in the 1990s) have revealed that the B’nai B’rith was supreme over all Masonic lodges in Russia and was behind the Bolshevik Revolutions in 1905 (which failed) and in 1917 (which succeeded). The Soviet commissars, mostly Jews, were responsible for the torture and deaths of millions of White ethnic Russians and Ukrainians during the first few decades of the Soviet regime. [T]he October 1917 Revolution (really a just a well-organized, well-carried out Jewish coup) was dominated by Jewish agitators (a documented fact) but so was the 1905 Revolution[…]. We also learn from the grand old man [Alexander Solzhenitsyn] the awe-inspiring extent of the Jewish domination of the Soviet Union during its first two decades of existence, including its ruthless and murderous internal security system: Tcheka, OGPU, NKGB, and NKVD. A Russian in the hands of the Tcheka, etc. was almost certain to be in the hands of Jewish torturers and executioners. The litany of Jewish crimes committed against the long-suffering Russians (and other Slavic peoples: Ukrainians and Belarussians) and coldly listed by the author is simply nauseating and one should approach both volumes on an empty stomach. (Review of Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s Two Hundred Years Together by Friedrich Braun. Link) […]

    Pingback by National-Socialist Party of Canada » Blog Archive » The B’nai Brith (sometimes spelled B’nai B’rith) and the origin of the ‘Russian’ revolution — January 27, 2008 #

78. Dear Reader -
    It is obvious. The forces at play and that have always been at play are still at play. One cannot ask anyone to “change”. Human nature will never change, if left to the human. We are all afflicted with disease - the diseases of lust, anger, greed, attachment and vanity. Each of these, if explained properly, would take a library. To blame another for any injustice, though it may be true, is to blame oneself. We all have checkered pasts and the darkest of closets…the soul within is eternal and his lived millions of lives before this puny eighty or ninety years. It has been oppressor and oppressed, torturer and tortured, king and beggar, man and woman - these are clothes which the soul wears to gather its needed experience throughout the vast cycles of time. My friends, we are all puppets motivated by unseen forces completely beyond our control. None are so enslaved as those who arrogantly think they are in control. And if allowed to continue on our present course, history will repeat itself, for human minds are diseased…the bankers whims move, terrible wars and depression and inflation anger the masses, violence en masse goes unchecked, detention centers commit cruelties and are overfilled…who are the winners and who are the losers? Do the elite think they have “won”? Is a world ruled by the few over the slave millions who are ruled, a victory? No. It is simply the play of karma from eons ago, manifesting on the stage/theater of today. It would be very interesting to know how many anti-semites have been rabbis in the past, and how many rabbis have been anti-semites in the past. I dare to say that we have been both, many many times and are here to transcend this age-old hatred and animosity.

    What to do? How in the world can we “rise above” such acrimonious and egregious thinking and feeling? Is there a truer identity that is REAL and ETERNAL of which, at this time, we have no inkling? Are we to be perpetually left with only recurring cycles of despotism, victimization, arrogant supremacy and vainglory? One can have trillions of dollars and be the most miserable and pathetic being internally.

    If one other is in pain…we are all in pain. This is the truth of the heart. And even the hardest of hearts will, through the cycles mentioned above, find a contrition that, after repeated injustices, will be so profound as to bring kings, popes, rabbis, intellectuals, bankers, illuminati and all vanity - to its knees in utter tears of repentance and regret. There is a time for this propitious event for each and every individual. At this point, something can and will be done, for it signifies the real atonement.

    Sound farfetched? You bet it is…but I wouldn’t put any limitations on the Divine which has blessed us with life…with the soul, our real and true essence, pure and eternal, without encumbrances or accretions of mind or matter.

    Comment by ALBERT — February 18, 2008 #

79. if nobody does, I am willing to translate A.S.’book:
    ‘Deux Siecles ensemble, Russes et juifs pendant la période soviétique’ into english. I own the french and german versions. Unfortunately I don’t master russian, the original language. What is more, I am citizen of the Netherlands, where publishing houses if not fully jewish ruled do certainly preclude this oeuvre from being published either in english or dutch. Our prosecutor is watching and waiting, propelled by a frenzy Anne Frank Foundation. I also don’t know of any way to contact the author or his Russian publisher to deal with their rights. (By the way, I am also willing to translate ‘La nouvelle question juive’by Guillaume Faye (suggesting a cooperation between advocates of an identary Europe and judeaists against islamisation, bargaining Israel’s EU membership and combatting revisionism for judeaists’ refraining from multiculturalism and other Europe’s identity sacking activities.)
    No way to get it published in the Netherlands!
    Since I am not a native english speaker/writer my offer is conditional on review by anyone so gifted and preferably known in this field of research.
    vierling@hotmail.com

    Comment by drs alfred vierling — May 31, 2008 #

80. Mr. Vierling, I thought of organizing a team of volunteer translators who would contribute their labor gratis to translating Solzhenitsyn’s work (each responsible for a portion of it) and am still ready to participate, but as you point out, permission would of course be needed for any translation to be published at a web-site.

    Comment by Fred Scrooby — May 31, 2008 #

81. “(By the way, I am also willing to translate ‘La nouvelle question juive’by Guillaume Faye (suggesting a cooperation between advocates of an identary Europe and judeaists against islamisation, bargaining Israel’s EU membership and combatting revisionism for judeaists’ refraining from multiculturalism and other Europe’s identity sacking activities.)”

    Have you read what Graf thinks of Faye?

    http://www.thecivicplatform.com/2007/11/20/the-new-jewish-question-or-the-end-of-guillaume-faye/

    Are you serious with your suggestion that we should maintain a ban on free inquiry and free speech insofar as the holocaust story is concerned, because if we don’t we might anger Jews and they’ll continue doing what they can to flaud our countries with Third World immigrants? This doesn’t seem like a serious proposal of a free man, but a pathetic avowal of weakness.

    Comment by Friedrich Braun — May 31, 2008 #

82. to Sir Friedrich Braun op.cit.
    My intention to translate the recent G.Faye book on ‘The new Jewish Question’ would enable a larger public to form an opinion. It is not the first task of a translater to comment on the text. For me, I am not yet able to form my opinion on the subject. I study, however, the comments on this book, including the one you mentioned. G. Faye wrote another very interesting book: ‘La colonisation de l’Europe’, depicturing its islamisation and etnic alternation (Umvolkung). I have had a discussion with him about that book (in french, dutch subtitled), which you can watch on the internet (google 4x alfred vierling (in this series also a discussion with Horst Mahler (Rote Armee Fraktion/NPD) (in german, dutch subtitled), for both interviews see http://www.thephora.net/forum/showthread.php?t=31706 or via my web-log: alfredvierling.web-log.nl
    I am not prepared to throw away in advance of thorough study all his wisdom for his misjudgements right away. On the contrary, I have the illusion to be able to reconcile him with the very revisionists whom he seems to have offended.
    You are advocating freedom of speech about the holocaust. I am also theoretically in favor of freedom of speech, but I, as a scholar of international law, I live in The Hague, the ‘CAPITAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW’(International Court of Justice, International Criminal Law Tribunal) and know that freedom of speech is only the right of the winners. (No way to find a forum here to critizise NATO’s genocides in Serbia, Afghanistan, Irak; Slobodan Milosevich killed by the Tribunal). It should not be that way, but it is that way and may-be the revisionists are looking too much in the retrospector. I have visited the Auswitsch
    and Buchenwald camps and I don’t need revisionist studies to be convinced of the fake expositions overthere. If I might allow a joke here, so as to illustrate the mood these camps inpinged upon me, I wondered about the direct flight connexions to Auswitch from Tel Aviv, ‘who would be the people to be transported on the return flight…’

    I certainly don’t agree with Mr. Guillaume Faye’s historical interpretations,– it seems to me that he is not as much after historical fact finding but after an historical artefact reconstruction to found his machiavellian approach to a way out from European culturo/etno masochism, in short a machiavelli-like attitude towards some ideological and religious idées fixes in order to ’save’ identary Europe. I do agree with you that it is a far cry from the intrinsic forces necessary to regain the north western hemisphere for its people and so an emergency call out of weakness.
    It would serve the identary forces of the north western hemisphere if we would form a study group learning from Soljénitzyne. Faye, Buchanan, etc to enhance our strategies; I dream of an international identairy institute, but first let us translate the most important texts and provide them on the internet to would-be contributors; in practice , however, publishers’and authors’rights are to be paid, for here in Europe, these brave kind of mankind has to pay enormous amounts in money and freedom deprivation to the prosecutors. ONe cannot win through courts what one cannot win in politics or by force. The old fox was right after all: ‘Power comes out of the barrel of a gun’ (Maozidongsixiang) cf C. Rice: ‘We have the guns so we decide what is the truth’. IN all the years of closely monitoring the activities of the institutions of international justice here in The Hague, I was not able to notice any deviation of that principle of le droit du plus fort.
    vierling@hotmail.com

    Comment by drs alfred vierling — June 1, 2008 #

83. to Sir Fred Scrooby sstt op.cit.
    Meanwhile I found out how to approach Mr. Soljénitzyne:
    He has a literary agent in Paris,
    Claude Durand bij Editions Fayard .
    A piece of the work has been translated and published in english by ISI books:

    http://www.amazon.com/Solzhenitsyn-Reader-Essential-Writings-1947-2005/dp/1933859008/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1212305492&sr=1-1

    I have this booklet here. look at
    http://www.isi.org/books/.
    ISI is a conservative organisation met links