A Third American War Crime in the Making

For a guy who served under Ronald Reagen, he sure sounds like Noam Chomsky sometimes.

By Paul Craig Roberts
31/03/08 “ICH” — The US Congress, the US media, the American people, and the United Nations, are looking the other way as Cheney prepares his attack on Iran.
Continue reading A Third American War Crime in the Making…

Iraq ruling elite needs US troops to stay in power

News you won’t see on Fox.

War Against Judeo-Bolsheviks and for a Free Europe!

Europe is a cesspool because they lost. The rest of Europe was subservient to Jews, and today, we see the results.

GERMANS: STILL, AND DESPITE EVERYTHING, THE BEST THAT THE ARYAN RACE HAS PRODUCED.

Should Wilders be censored?

DOSSIER
Linie
Continue reading Should Wilders be censored?…

A Quick Review of Dr. Sunic’s Latest Monograph

There‘s a lot to like about Dr. Tomislav Sunic’s little book: Homo americanus: Child of the Postmodern Age . Firstly, it is exceedingly rare nowadays to read a contemporary author who passionately argues against both democracy (in its parliamentary form) and its twin, equality. Prior to the Second World War political theorists who advanced similar (socialist and aristocratic) ideas from the Right belonged to a school of thought often called Revolutionary Conservatism; today, kindred ideas can sometimes be found among the more daring writers of the European New Right. However, by and large, the post-World War II bien-pensants commissars of the international Left and extreme Left, in Europe as well as in North America and elsewhere, have been very successful at quickly stifling all voices that deviate from the established parameters of what is and what is not permissible (for an analysis of this phenomenon I recommend Mario Consoli’s Introduction to Jürgen Graf’s Holocaust or Hoax? The Arguments).

The list of what ails the (formerly) White West is long and complex but two factors stand out for Dr. Sunic: laissez-faire market capitalism and Christianity. Dr. Sunic in essence accepts Alain de Benoist’s thesis that it is beyond ironic to watch so-called conservatives oblivious to the fact that the inevitable result of unrestrained, laissez-faire, savage capitalism is the total annihiliation of everything that traditional conservatives are supposed to hold dear (I am assuming that most of today’s conservatives want to conserve something else beside the size of their wallets…but one never knows anymore). Let us not forget that globalisation and mass migration are largely fueled by international capitalists and deracinated corporations (only the bottom line matters!).

Another villain on Dr. Sunic’s list is Christianity. For those living in post-Christian Western Europe this might seem like beating a dead horse. Nonetheless, the point Dr. Sunic is making is much broader than mere church attendance or how many people today accept Jesus as their Lord and Saviour. In essence, Dr. Sunic writes, centuries of being force-fed Christianity has made the White man weak, completely destroying his immune system, rendering him unable to resist and fight againt various societal upheavals and for his ethnic genetic interests (Jean Raspail’s Camp of the Saints remains the best fictionalized account of how a White nation cannot face down the challenge of Third World immigration because of its archaic vestiges of Christian morality deeply embedded in its post-modern psyche). However, Christianity’s replacement in the form of secular humanism is in many ways even worse than the initial disease, since secular humanism basically offers the European man effete Christian ethics only without a belief in a deity.

The only flaw that I can see in Dr. Sunic’s monograph concerns his passages regarding America’s never ending world crusade for democracy. It is quite astonishing to see an intellectual of Dr. Sunic’s calibre and sophistication take Richard Perle’s self-serving nonsense at face value. The United States is not interested in promoting democracy around the world…that is for the brids! What America wants today is what she has always wanted since at least the days of Woodrow Wilson, obedient slave governments around the world that always do what America asks of them. American governments are not interested in democracy if democracy means anti-American, protectionist, socialist, or otherwise rebellious polities. (George Galloway made that very point in a debate with the ultimate Jewish neocon (to be redundant) Richard Perle here.) The so-called crusade for democracy is a phrase masking America’s rapacious geopolitical aggrandizement and territorial conquests.

But this is a rather small flaw in what is a thoroughly enjoyable read!

IHR News and Comment

A free public service of the Institute for Historical Review
March 31, 2008
Continue reading IHR News and Comment…

What the Greatest Philosophers Said about Nigger-Animals

Spoken at a time when a White man could still speak freely.

Hume on Racism:

I am apt to suspect the Negroes to be naturally inferior to the Whites. There scarcely ever was a civilized nation of that complexion, nor even any individual, eminent either in action or speculation. No ingenious manufactures amongst them, no arts, no sciences …

Kant on Racism:

The Negroes of Africa have by nature no feeling that rises above the trifling. Mr. Hume challenges anyone to cite a single example in which a Negro has shown talents, and asserts that among the hundreds of thousands of blacks who are transported elsewhere from their countries, although many of them have even been set free, still not a single one was every found who presented anything great in art or science or any other praiseworthy quality, even though among the whites some continually rise aloft from the lowest rabble, and through superior gifts earn respect in the world …

Schopenhauer on Racism:

The highest civilization and culture, apart from the ancient Hindus and Egyptians, are found exclusively among the white races; and even with many dark peoples, the ruling caste or race is fairer in colour than the rest and has, therefore, evidently immigrated, for example, the Brahmins, the Incas, and the rulers of the South Sea Islands …

Hegel on Africa:

The peculiarly African character is difficult to comprehend, for the very reason that in reference to it, we must quite give up the principle which naturally accompanies all our ideas—the category of Universality. In Negro life the characteristic point is the fact that consciousness has not yet attained to the realization of any substantial objective existence-as for example, God, or Law … The Negro, as already observed, exhibits the natural man in his completely wild and untamed state …

Today’s White Women: Materialistic, Hedonistic, Childish, Egotistic, Moronic, Superficial Whores and Pigs

Heidi Scum, emblematic of modern White women. She personifies so much of what I utterly detest about today’s White women.

Was there ever a man who knew women better than Nietzsche?

-”Women are considered profound—why? Because one never fathoms their depths. Women aren’t even shallow.”

-“You are going to women? Do not forget the whip!”

Taken from a thread on Stormfront: Who else has no female friends?

I’m a 22 year old girl (woman?) and I have no female friends. In fact the only friend I really have is my long term boyfriend. I just hate the way (white) girls my age act. They talk in really annoying gossipy, valley girl voices and they are all into rap music and MTV crap. It seems all they are interested in is partying and other superficial things. They don’t care about the world around them. If they do seem to “care” about any worldly issues, they are just the ones that the media tells them to care about like darfur, hurricane katrina and AIDS in Africa. They don’t understand anything about their race and don’t really care that they even belong to the greatest race on earth. Everytime I have ever said anything race related around one of them they end up getting really pissed off and immediately launch into defense mode, telling me all about the wonderful black “gentlemen” they have dated in the past, or their mexican friends.

It just seems hopeless. I am lonely for female companionship. Having a boyfriend is not enough, I miss girl time. Only problem is all the girls around here are brainwashed, liberal MTV fembots! Who else has this problem?

I don’t have any female friends. I had a few, but they went the way of the norm around here and one of them is living with a black guy and just had his baby(she named the damn thing Zachiah Lumpkin). The other one lost her virginity at the age of 15 and by 16 she had slept with 35 guys, only about 7 of which were white. No, I have one friend, a guy. I really miss ‘girl time,’ but I’d rather be lonely than put up with those negro-loving whores.

I only have one female friend. She is quite the whore, so over the years I’ve limited my communications with her. I have to agree with many of the other girls on this thread that lots of non-racialist females ARE whores. And when she tells me about her ‘escapades’ with all these men, I just sit back and listen, get disgusted, and ask myself why do I keep her as my friend? Well, the answer is simple. I have no others. Being racially and politically aware, I have become somewhat miserable. I cannot tolerate females (or males for that matter) who have no clue about the social ills that are brought about by multiculturalism. I have no patience for people who can’t think for themselves. As it stands, I do rely on my boyfriend for much needed talks, laughter, etc, but when it comes down to it, I would LIKE to have a female to talk to. I think it’s in our nature to want to talk to other females like how it was back in the day of our grandmothers’.

I often get sad thinking about what my wedding ceremony is going to be like, being that I don’t have anyone to invite.

Spring Fling in Iran? — Updating World War III

By Captain Eric H. May
Intelligence Correspondent
Continue reading Spring Fling in Iran? — Updating World War III…

Karl Maria Wiligut’s Runic Alphabet

Karl Maria Wiligut.

It is my understanding that Karl Maria Wiligut was the official Nazi runeologist. Can someone post his runic alphabet (or rune row)? I’m especially interested in finding out how to spell Michael using Karl Maria Wiligut’s runic alphabet.

Thanks.

US grubby, greasy, hook-nosed kikes attack Australian unions over ad

Note that the grubby kikes can never come up with a good argument for supporting racist, genocidal, apartheid, hate-state of Israel: instead, they rely on smears, intimidation and character assassination. .. It’s hard to see how they think that
they’ll get support this way…

Toronto Chinese Rally Turns Ugly [Multiculturalism is Pure Bliss! It Enriches us All!]

Toronto Chinese Rally Turns Ugly.

Participants heckle Tibetans: ‘Leave Canada.’ Mayor’s China trip questioned. [A splendid idea! Do you promise to follow them?]

Europeans have NO balls!

… Slovenia says the film incites hatred, which in the Netherlands is an offence punishable by law. The Dutch government said the film only aims to hurt people´s feelings….

How able are Americans to bear the costs of war?

War in Iraq presents a paradox on the American home front: The military effort has had little discernible impact on most Americans, but by some forecasts, the Iraq effort will end up costing more per citizen than many US wars with higher numbers of casualties – Korea, Vietnam, and the Civil War.

“Bush is the biggest thug ever to occupy the White House”

President George W. Bush is “the biggest thug” ever to occupy the White House, writes historian Michael Parenti, adding that most post-World War II U.S. presidents have also acted like “thugs.”

German JEWISH body sues You Tube for allowing videos critical of Jewry

BERLIN (EJP)— Germany’s Jewish representative body has filed suite against YouTube and its parent company Google, demanding a court order for the website to be permanently purged of anti-Semitic videos.

French Sr.Civil Servant fired for anti Israel Pamphlet

PARIS (EJP)— A French senior civil servant was fired after publishing an anti-Israeli pamphlet on internet, the Interior Ministry announced Sunday.

According to French television, Bruno Guigue, deputy prefect of the southwestern French town of Saintes, wrote in an online column this month that Israel was the only regime that allows “snipers shoot down little girls outside their school gates.»

“Freedom” in Iraq: No Unions Allowed

Update on the Civil War Surge in Iraq
Continue reading “Freedom” in Iraq: No Unions Allowed…

The Jews’ greed knows no bounds, and Jews have no shame

Developer Sues to Win $12.3 Billion in 9/11 Attack
Continue reading The Jews’ greed knows no bounds, and Jews have no shame…

Treatment of Germans by Americans During and After W.W.II

The following is part of Chapter V: “In Yahweh We Trust: A Divine Foreign Policy” from Dr. Tom Sunic’s book: Homo americanus; Child of the Postmodern Age (2007) .

I cannot recommend this book highly enough and will soon write a review. Buy it today!

Similar discriminatory acts against ideological opponents were reserved for Germany during and after World War II. Whereas everybody in American and European postmodern political establishment are obliged to know by heart the body count of Fascist and National Socialist victims, nobody still knows the exact number of Germans killed by American forces during and after World War II. Worse, as noted earlier, a different perspective in describing the US post-war foreign policy toward Europe and Germany is not considered politically correct. After the ill-fated American military excursion into Iraq in 2003 and the subsequent media coverage of American crimes committed there, the question in retrospect needs to be raised as to the behavior of the American military in Germany in 1945 and after. The American mistreatment of German POWs and civilians during World War II must have been far worse than that in Iraq after 2003.

Just as communism, following the Second World War, used large scale terror in the implementation of its foreign policy goals in Eastern Europe, so did America use its own type of repression to silence heretics in the occupied parts of postwar-Europe. Purges carried out by the American military authorities in postwar Germany remain an uneasy topic for many official American historians who mostly study the Allied version of war events. Many European conservative scholars have also been unable to comprehend sudden shifts in American political behavior, because many have traditionally assumed that America is a cultural and spiritual extension of Europe. American political behavior in war ravaged Europe could only be understood and judged within America’s own judgmental parameters. Using classical European value judgments regarding the notion of limited vs. unlimited warfare, yields different results that are often rejected by American elites.

The American crusade to extirpate evil was felt by Germans in full force in the aftermath of World War II. Freda Utley, an English-American writer depicts graphically in her books the barbaric methods applied by American military authorities against German civilians and prisoners in war ravaged Germany. Although Utley enjoyed popularity among American conservatives, her name and her works fell quickly into oblivion. Nonetheless, it is worth reminding that when an American author of her stature writes about American war crimes in Europe, she or he will naturally elicit more credibility than when a German or a French historian writes about the same topic. Utley’s book throws additional light on the other side of America’s much vaunted humaneness. In hindsight one wonders whether there was any substantive difference between warmongering Americanism and Communism? If one takes into account the behavior of American military authorities in Germany after World War II, it becomes clear why American elites, half a century later, were unwilling to initiate the process of decommunisation in Eastern Europe, as well as the process of demarxisation in American and European higher education. After all, were not Roosevelt and Stalin war time allies? Were not American and Soviet soldiers fighting the same “Nazi evil”?

It was the inhumane behavior of the American military interrogators that left deep scars on the German psyche and which explains why Germans, and by extension all Europeans, act today in foreign affairs like scared lackeys of American geopolitical interests.

A thoughtful American professor, whom I met in Heidelberg, expressed the opinion that the United States military authorities on entering Germany and seeing the ghastly destruction wrought by our obliteration bombing were fearful that knowledge of it would cause a revulsion of opinion in America and might prevent the carrying out of Washington’s policy for Germany by awakening sympathy for the defeated and realization of our war crimes. This, he believes, is the reason why a whole fleet of aircraft was used by General Eisenhower to bring journalists, Congressmen, and churchmen to see the concentration camps; the idea being that the sight of Hitler’s starved victims would obliterate consciousness of our own guilt. Certainly it worked out that way. No American newspaper of large circulation in those days wrote up the horror of our bombing or described the ghastly conditions in which the survivors were living in the corpse-filled ruins. American readers sipped their fill only of German atrocities.

Utley’s work is today unknown in American higher education although her prose constitutes a valuable document in studying the crusading and inquisitorial character of Americanism in Europe. There are legions of similar revisionist books on the topic describing the plight of Germans and Europeans after the Second World War, but due to academic silence and self-censorship of many scholars, these books do not reach mainstream professional and academic circles. Moreover, both American and European historians still seem to be light years away from historicizing contemporary history and its aftermath. This is understandable, in view of the fact that acting and writing otherwise would throw an ugly light on crimes committed by the Americans in Germany during and after the Second World War and would substantially ruin anti-fascist victimology, including the Holocaust narrative.

American crimes in Europe, committed in the immediate aftermath of the Second World War, included extra-legal killings of countless German civilians and disarmed soldiers, while tacitly approving serial Soviet genocides and mass expulsions of the German civilian population in Eastern Europe. As Utley notes, the sheer sight of the horror and destruction which American warplanes had inflicted on German towns and cities, from the psychological point of view, must have prompted the American military authorities and subsequent American administrations, academics, journalists, historians, and opinion makers to cover up America’s own misdeeds. Consequently, a whole new industry of story telling regarding real or alleged National Socialist crimes was established in the West. As years and decades went by, crimes committed by the Americans against Germans were either whitewashed or ascribed to the defeated Germans. Utley describes in detail how thousands of German captives, before being dispatched to the gallows, were molested by the American interrogators. Charges filed against them were based on flimsy evidence, with no chance for a suspect of standing a fair trial.

The exact number of German casualties during and after the Second World War remains unknown. The number of German dead varies wildly, ranging from 6 to 16 million Germans, including civilians and soldiers. The official American hesitancy to establish the precise number of German war losses is understandable, as this is a topic that American court historians do not find compatible with the spirit of Americanism. It is only the fascist criminology of World War II, along with the rhetorical projection of the evil side of the Holocaust that modern historiographers like to repeat, with Jewish American historians and commentators being at the helm of this narrative. Other victimhoods and other victimologies, notably those of people who suffered under communism, are rarely mentioned. Although Germany was the direct party involved in the war, the entire European continent was affected by the American military victory. The American supreme military headquarters, under the general Dwight Eisenhower, withdrew after May 8, 1945, the POW status to German soldiers who had earlier been taken prisoners. According to some German historians over a million and a half German soldiers died after the end of hostilities in American and Soviet-run prison camps.

Political events in America and Europe since 1945 bear a strong mark of the Manichean approach in American foreign policy and hark back to the struggle which pitted the nations of European ancestry against other European nations, albeit with three radically different world views. There is a large and impressive “un-American” revisionist legacy in America depicting various aspects of American foreign policy during and after the Second World War. These revisionist scholars do not shy away from describing the plight of Germans and other Europeans at the hand of their American victors. However, their prose, although having legally a right of entry in America, has not had to date much of an impact on public consciousness and political decision making. The answer is not difficult to guess. The masters of discourse in postmodern America have powerful means to decide the meaning of the historical truth and provide the meaning with their own historical context. Mentioning extensively Germany’s war losses runs the risk of eclipsing the scope of Jewish war looses, which makes many Jewish intellectuals exceedingly nervous. Every nation likes to see its own sacred victimhood on the top of the list of global suffering. Moreover, if critical revisionist literature were ever to gain a mainstream foothold in America and Europe, it would render a serious blow to the ideology of Americanism and would dramatically change the course of history in the coming decades. Having this in mind, America’s former foes, Japan and Germany, as well as other European countries, must continue to toe the line of American “cognitive warfare” in postmodernity.