Heidi Scum, emblematic of modern White women. She personifies so much of what I utterly detest about today’s White women.
Was there ever a man who knew women better than Nietzsche?
-”Women are considered profound—why? Because one never fathoms their depths. Women aren’t even shallow.”
-“You are going to women? Do not forget the whip!”
Taken from a thread on Stormfront: Who else has no female friends?
I’m a 22 year old girl (woman?) and I have no female friends. In fact the only friend I really have is my long term boyfriend. I just hate the way (white) girls my age act. They talk in really annoying gossipy, valley girl voices and they are all into rap music and MTV crap. It seems all they are interested in is partying and other superficial things. They don’t care about the world around them. If they do seem to “care” about any worldly issues, they are just the ones that the media tells them to care about like darfur, hurricane katrina and AIDS in Africa. They don’t understand anything about their race and don’t really care that they even belong to the greatest race on earth. Everytime I have ever said anything race related around one of them they end up getting really pissed off and immediately launch into defense mode, telling me all about the wonderful black “gentlemen” they have dated in the past, or their mexican friends.
It just seems hopeless. I am lonely for female companionship. Having a boyfriend is not enough, I miss girl time. Only problem is all the girls around here are brainwashed, liberal MTV fembots! Who else has this problem?
I don’t have any female friends. I had a few, but they went the way of the norm around here and one of them is living with a black guy and just had his baby(she named the damn thing Zachiah Lumpkin). The other one lost her virginity at the age of 15 and by 16 she had slept with 35 guys, only about 7 of which were white. No, I have one friend, a guy. I really miss ‘girl time,’ but I’d rather be lonely than put up with those negro-loving whores.
I only have one female friend. She is quite the whore, so over the years I’ve limited my communications with her. I have to agree with many of the other girls on this thread that lots of non-racialist females ARE whores. And when she tells me about her ‘escapades’ with all these men, I just sit back and listen, get disgusted, and ask myself why do I keep her as my friend? Well, the answer is simple. I have no others. Being racially and politically aware, I have become somewhat miserable. I cannot tolerate females (or males for that matter) who have no clue about the social ills that are brought about by multiculturalism. I have no patience for people who can’t think for themselves. As it stands, I do rely on my boyfriend for much needed talks, laughter, etc, but when it comes down to it, I would LIKE to have a female to talk to. I think it’s in our nature to want to talk to other females like how it was back in the day of our grandmothers’.
I often get sad thinking about what my wedding ceremony is going to be like, being that I don’t have anyone to invite.
I wouldn’t take anything the ladies at Stormfront say seriously, these are women who think burkas look slutty. WN women are the most uptight humorless little twats I have ever seen. It’s no wonder these bitches have no friends.
I don’t see untruths in their observations, they happen to correspond to my own. Calling them humourless bitches, etc. doesn’t address the core of their opinions.
Mannquin, you might be seen as uptight and humorless if being with it meant opening your legs for every brown and black dick that has a sob story, and humor consisted of making fun of white people and shit/porn humor.
Perhaps all the WN women should get together on a cruise line and have a trip to Alaska or something. If women started a social group online and maybe got together maybe they could find some friends to hang out with.
Contrary to popular opinion WNs don’t want to spend their time talking about how much they hate people. Most of us just want to have a fun time without the interference of obnoxious and pushy non-whites.
I’m glad these young women see these nigger loving whores for what they are. Niggers are much more prone to AIDS, syphilis, rape and murder. So staying as far away from them is not only smart, but a matter of survival.
mannequin
You obviously have no idea what is going on around you. Why would any level-thinking young white lady want to mix with race traitor whores who, in my opinion, are as low as the filthy vermin niggers they have sex with.
The persistent and ubiquitous Jew meddling in US education (and much else) is partly to blame for the mind-buggering ignorance of present day Americans, as per this video:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=e6W3T7MTh4M
I agree 100% with Herr Braun and the Stormfront women. The women’s lib crowd wanted “equal rights” - and this is what it became. The lowest common denominator. Liberal feminism is nothing but an apology for vapid, hedonistic decadence. I’ll be surprised if 10% of our race survives this century.
American women were raised by the TV just like the men and their formative years training is maintained by Oprah and company. Most of the women I’ve dated recently are 1000 times more interested in getting off than raising a family, that is until they turn 39 and then its a rush to have a child with Mr. Right Now.
I’ve noticed something about the marriages that are still in tact as well. Most of them are ruled by the woman and the man has abdicated all power and slinks around hoping to get away for a round of golf once a week if he behaves. Socially women reinforce this upside down dynamic, you are a black sheep if you don’t keep your husband tightly under your thumb.
And of course you can’t discount the legal system which truly has ceded all power to the woman. Once she has a child she truly is holding all the cards and the legal system is there to ensure she can easily assert this power through divorce rulings, child support, custody, visitation etc, all of which she will use to control the relationship with the full force of government behind her. This of course only applies to marriages involving white men. Women who have children with minorities are typically told its not worth the legal costs to pursue child support from low income, randomly employed fathers and of course most of these minority fathers are not interested in custody or visitation, only in knocking up more white women and removing them from the pool available to white men.
Not to leave white men from the lash, they in my opinion are mostly pathetic sheep still only able to talk about their favorite sports team even as their country falls into the economic abyss. It turns my stomach. Talk about not having anyone to talk to, I hear ya sister.
Travis’ post is remarkably insightful and it highlights the main problem with families in the Western world – namely the law.
Divorce law is anti-family and anti-race, and it has arisen – like so many poisons – from the media-created counter-culture movement of the 1960s (Thanks Jews).
The current legal rules encourage women with children to divorce. If a marriage is struggling, and the wife sees that she can take the kids while being guaranteed a fixed income from her one-time husband, she will often do it. The fact that he will have to come to her, hat-in-hand, to even see his children is another alluring perk offered by modern divorce.
A great many women take the payoff offered by divorce and live comfortably by supplementing their income with their ex-husband’s earnings. Tragically, this strange arraignment often means no more kids because new boyfriends don’t like raising other men’s kids, and women don’t want more kids if they can’t get someone to pay for them. If the family hadn’t divorce in the first place, more children would have come along in due course.
There are so many problems with these laws that a person starts to trip over their own feet just to highlight them, but let me point out a few that come readily to mind.
One injustice of this system is that it takes no accounting of the changing state of the national economy. In a natural family unit the members weather the bad times and thrive during the good. But in the Jew-perverted-world the mother and divorcee can expect the same payments from her former husband during an economic boom or great depression. If the economy tanks, men still have to pay or face prison.
Another problem is that divorced men aren’t able to enforce instructive discipline on their kids because the father is – for practical purposes – unnecessary. This means that his familial relationship with his kids becomes largely motivated by his need to be liked by them. It is a badly twisted situation and it forces fathers to play a strange role, something akin to favorite uncle. A role that is not fatherly and utterly impotent to properly shape young minds. (Thanks anti-family Frankfurt school Marxist Jews).
It is important, however, to recognize that these legal realities are not the fault of the women who take advantage of them. Life is often hard, people struggle to make ends meet and in desperate situations they make the best short term choices available. Another way of saying this is: people are less than they think they are. They will, when push-comes-to-shove, take as much as they can within the framework society allows. If they live in a society where the law views one sex as morally superior to the other, someone is going to get screwed. Don’t hate your own women for this. Hate the same people sent the jobs overseas and then stuck you in an impossible situation: Big Media Jews, Globalists, and Social Marxists.
The modern phenomenon of divorce is instantly fixed once divorce law treats both sexes equally. When one sex can’t exploit the other then both men and women will rediscover that they have always needed the other to endure in the great struggle of life.
Keep your ear to the ground and your powder dry, change will come in our lifetimes.
“Outside”’s comment is excellent with one exception: men and women aren’t equal in these matters because women have the nurturing role vis-à-vis babies and children, and morally-speaking that comes “before” the man: the man is morally secondary here and must accept that. Of course the woman has to actually play, has to actually fulfill, the feminine child-nurturing role, or she’s no better than a pig, a slut, and in such a case the man has moral precedence over the woman.
I specifically agree, of course, where “Outside” blames the Marxist, Frankfurt-School type Jews for this crap.
Thanks Fred.
I see your point and there is a lot of sense in it. A healthy culture and economy should certainly be structured to revere the woman’s role. To my way of thinking there is even wiggle room for female professionals and academics. It’s just that a healthy society wouldn’t celebrate such women as examples of its highest ideals
In reference to my post, I didn’t necessarily mean that the sexes are equal. Perhaps it would’ve been more accurate to say that they complement each other, or that they are each unequal to their opposites in some way. Men have better political instincts on average, but women can do some things well that men are hard pressed to do at all (not to mention the obvious biological things men cannot do.)
As a practical solution, more balanced divorce law would force women to reconsider divorce because it would be logistically and economically more difficult than staying married. As things are, divorce is the wife’s easiest solution, and this is born out by statistics that show women initiate divorce proceedings in nigh eighty percent of divorce cases.
LMAO at the avitar