The ‘Sovereign’ Federal Republic of Germany [= Zionist Occupied Territory]

David Brockschmidt

According to international law, a country is sovereign if the country can make internal and external decisions without the interference of another country and any foreign and/or inner political pressure group.

The question I am asking here is addressed to the current German government and its Chancellor Dr Angela Merkel: Is the Federal Republic of Germany today a completely sovereign country according to its own and international law? Yes or No!

If the answer is no, then please explain what the internal and external restrictions imposed on Germany are. If the answer is yes, then please explain why the following points I’m addressing here do not affect Germany’s sovereignty.

1. Germany has no peace treaty with the countries Germany was at war during World War Two. These were 64 countries, including the four main victor powers over Germany: USA, UK, USSR and France.

2. The enemy clauses against Germany and Japan within the United Nation’s charter still exist and can be enforced at any time against Germany and/or Japan, and if necessary by use of military force.

3. The present German government tells its citizens and the international community that Germany within its borders of today is the total of all German territory. The German constitutional court’s decision of 1973 tells us the opposite. The judgment clearly says that the German Reich still exists de jure within its 1December 1937 borders. One look at the geographical map of 1937 and of Germany today makes it crystal clear that the German territories, which constitute geographically Eastern Germany is now part of Poland and Russia. These territories, according to the four allies victor powers over Germany decided at the Teheran, Yalta and Potsdam conferences should have been only under Polish and Russian administration until a peace treaty is signed with Germany. This has to date not happened. How is it possible then that the German government after World War Two signed away these territories de jure to Russia and Poland, which they de facto administrated, if Germany’s own constitutional court decided in 1973 that these territories are de jure still part of Germany within the borders of the German Reich of 1937. Does that make any sense?

4. After the re-unification of West Germany/FRG-BRD and Middle Germany/GDR-DDR German citizens and the international community were told that according to the 2+4 Agreement the four victors’ powers over Germany gave up their rights and responsibilities over their four occupational zones in Germany and their occupation sectors of Greater Berlin. This is not correct!

The four victor powers gave up their duties over Germany and Berlin as a whole but not their rights.

The officially-published 2+4 Agreement documents make this crystal clear. The fact is that most of the occupational rights of the Allies - USA, UK and France – but not their responsibilities towards Germany have been incorporated or taken over into the so-called NATO Troup Statute. Therein it is stated quite clearly that the Allies’ war and post-war rights over defeated Germany remain and are not abolished.

5. The above four points culminate in the Chancellor’s File – Kanzlerakte. The West German government under Chancellor Konrad Adenauer and the High Commissioners of the three occupational forces, USA, UK and France, dictated a secret state treaty dated 21 May 1949, which was signed on 23 May 1949 by Chancellor Konrad Adenauer, the president of the German Parliament, Adolf Schönfelder and the vice president of the German parliament, Hermann Schäfer. The main point of this secret agreement is the so-called Allies’ veto, which derives from the enemy clauses against Germany and Japan as laid down in the UN Charter. It states: 5.1. The German media will be controlled by the occupation powers of Germany until 2099. 5.2. Germany’s gold reserves were confiscated without compensation. 5.3. The so-called Allies’ veto regarding defeated Germany included any external and internal decision the German government would have made only with the consent of the three western military high commissioners.

6. General Major Gerd-Helmut Komossa, chief of Germany’s military espionage agency – Militarischer Abschirm Dienst –MAD – from 1977 to 1980, confirms this top-secret ‘agreement’ between the German government under Chancellor Adenauer and the Western Allies in his book: Die deutsche Karte­ – The German Card, Graz, 2007, ISBN: 978-3-902475-34-3, at p. 21. Acording to General Major Komossa every new German Chancellor has to sign this secret agreement, the so-called Kanzlerakte, before being sworn in as Chancellor by the German parliament.

May I also remind the reader that the ex-western occupation zones of Germany are still occupied today by the military forces of the USA, UK, France, Canada, Belgium and the Netherlands. This on-going occupation of Germany by the countries mentioned above is justified and legalized within the NATO Troups Statute which incorporates most of the occupational rights of the Victor Powers of Germany. The Allies’ military installations in Germany and indeed the whole of western Europe and Japan are ex-territorial, like foreign embassies. Local laws and regulations do not apply within the territory of such military grounds.

Please Madam Chancellor of the FRG, Dr Angela Merkel, did you have to sign the so-called Chancellor file – Kanzlerakte and/or any other documents involving any foreign power which would impact and affect the freedom and sovereignty of the FRG and its people?

The irony here is that the only victorious power over Germany, Russia – the ex-Soviet Union, has permanently left its German zone of occupation and its occupational sector of Greater Berlin!

Unfortunately the ‘sovereign’ FRG cannot give the other occupational forces in the ex-western occupational zones of Germany their marching orders. This would clash with the Allies’ rights flowing from the agreements made between the three Allies – Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin – at the Teheran, Yalta and Potsdam conferences.

To sum all this up: I would like to agree with the ex-US ambassador to Germany, Kornblum, who quite forcefully informed the German authorities: “You are not sovereign!” This statement was not refuted or disputed by anyone within the German government.

So, Madam, Chancellor, please explain! I ask: Does German State Sovereignty exist?

N.B.:

1. Not all documents regarding the 2+4 Agreement between the two former German states and the Four Allies’ powers have been made public, and some are classified for many years to come. 2. Regarding Major General Gerd-Helmut Komossa’s book, which was published last year, I ask myself why is there not an uprising, nor even a questioning of his writing about the Kanzlerakte in the German media. Do Germans live in a permanent state of denial regarding their own history?

Source.