“Riaz is of foreign stock himself, which is fine … except that he won’t admit it.”

He needs to come clean with his ethnicity (and with his race and species also, if those are relevant) but he won’t. I did it with mine and nothing horrible has happened — got me banned for life at GdV (which I admit I was pretty disappointed about) and gets me sneered at by guys like “Northerner” and rarely Desmond Jones, but that’s about it. Joe Sobran’s got the same last name as Riaz and says he’s of Ruthenian extraction (if memory serves, that’s some variety of Ukrainian; please correct me). There’s worse stuff out there than being a Ruthenian Uke so, if that’s all Sobrany’s concerned about, in his place I wouldn’t worry. But it’s that “Riaz” part that’s potentially trouble. What is that? He tried to smoothen it over by saying it “might be” a village in Switzerland but somehow I don’t think that’s it, sorry …

I’m Aryan.

What did you think I am? Chinese?!

Primarily indigenous people - although Dissident Congress knows how unpatriotic many of them are!

The general opinion held by Dissident Congress when it comes to ethnics is that the vast majority don’t benefit Britain and are unpatriotic at their best and dangerous at their worst.

Would a Russian/? claiming the “right to control [Britain’s] affairs and decide on its own future… not qualify for that definition of ‘nationalist’ (whih is known as imperialism in everyone’s book but yours).

Uncle Sam’s definition of nationalist is imperialist resulting in US global domination. Many Americans take this to be the definition of nationalist.

Sobrany is Russian, what about Riaz?

Either the name of a village in Switzerland, or the Persian word for the Hanging Gardens of Babylon.

Would a Russian/? claiming the “right to control [Britain's] affairs and decide on its own future… not qualify for that definition of ‘nationalist’ (whih is known as imperialism in everyone’s book but yours).

The name Sobrany is Russian.

So your interest is ‘The Realm’ first, and then all the peoples within it: be they Russians or Muslims, and, I suppose, Greeks, Maoris, and Jews etc.? Oh, and any English, Welsh, Irish, and Scots within The Realm.

Some nationalism.

Sobrany is Russian, what about Riaz?

Some people’s definition of Nationalism is a desire to control and dominate as much of the world as possible. This is certainly not the Dissident Congress policy although we would be more than happy to see similar organisations spring up in other countries.

Other people’s definition of nationalism is a belief in the concept of the nation state with its own peoples, culture, language, identity, and the right to control its own affairs and decide on its own future. This is Dissident Congress policy on nationalism.

The name Sobrany is Russian.

Your name, also, suggests a foreign background. Are you an immigrant, or perhaps the descendant of rewcent immigrants?

These have had a few strong moments in the ’90s but the past years, most have become national-anarchists. There’s also a moderate English movement, but their views on immigration etc. aren’t strong enough (though it could be worse).

In any case, when you ask them about the difference, they’ll tell you the forming of the UK was a mistake and England should be based on its identity from before the 18th century.

I won’t judge about this issue since I’m not from there, but I’m not in favor of the ‘British’ fabric that the BNP calls an identity. Honestly, they’re practically only present in England as it is, so where’s the Britishness? There’s this old Flemish poem that goes like this:

Daar is een Belgische koning
Veel Belgische vertoning
Een Belgische vlag, een Belgisch lied
Maar Belgen, neen Belgen zijn er niet

Translated:

There is a Belgian king
Lots of Belgian display
A Belgian flag, a Belgian song
But Belgians, no, Belgians there are none

I guess you can switch Belgian with British, although I know the actual historical comparison doesn’t fly. As I said, I’m merely speaking my own opinion here as a decentralist. Oh well.

PS
The White Dragon is the Anglosaxon flag of England, this explicitly excludes all Celtic people.

What’s the difference? Politically speaking, English identity is inseparable from Britishness. That may change, however, since many English nationalists, such as Guessesworker, consider the term “British” to be a devalued currency.