From: Michele Renouf []
Sent: Sunday, 8 June 2008 5:47 AM
To:
Subject: simply CRYSTAL!
Dear Ted
Here’s alerting all those I hereby bcc, to your News On News broadcasts
about USA media propaganda and pollster trickery - you’re simply CRYSTAL!
Wow what a neat piece of media investigation into how the American
electorate and world viewing public have been systematically denied Ron
Paul’s presidential candidature plus an equal chance to see a singular
political alternative to the anti-democratic propagating of corporate global
interests.
I can scarcely wait to get back to seeing the remainder below Part 2, which
I have just viewed, on the censorship of Ron Paul (whom I hold high and had
a lucky chance to say so in person when I visited him, in 2003 with a mutual
pal Joe Sobran, on Capitol Hill: “Israeli Occupied Territory” as Pat
Buchanan, another of Joe’s perspicacious pals who, by being systematically
sidelined out of his presidential candidature, aptly demonstrates the proof.
I simply thrive on championing those courageous heroes who challenge the
seemingly invincible and give us pride. So it is a nice surprise from you
that you link to my latest news - as reported best on Peter Rushton’s
website (which he named after my dvd) at www.jailingopinions.com
Your video montage is a shattering exposé on how our mainstream media goes
about misinforming, abusing, and sullying a trusting public, in parallel
with its “demonizing, ostracizing, and criminalizing” of source critical
dissenters, as I have just been complaining about in Corrections to the
Editors of the Jewish Chronicle and the Mail On Sunday, see below your
email.
Cheers!
Michele
Ted Wansley wrote:
Dear Michelle,
A few months ago I began producing online broadcasts and publishing them on
YouTube. My first challenged the claim that the President of Iran said he
wanted to “wipe Israel off the map.” It included part of Wolf Blitzer’s
interview with David Duke.
Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hmCIw5lPi-M
Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lM7fbFJGFTk
Then I did one on the censorship of Ron Paul, which made the top 10 list of
Ron Paul videos.
Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXCkgz1Y-Bk
Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4QO7zXTljE
&feature=related
My most recent News on News production was on vote fraud in the 2008
presidential primaries.
Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=635TjnBnA5A
Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_wIQONa0io
&feature=related
Part 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=89V1F2CahUA
&feature=related
Part 4: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qnrwvftt6vs
&feature=related
If you review them, I hope you enjoy.
Good to hear from you,
Ted Wansley >>
—————————
So, Ted, here below are the two CORRECTIONS TO EDITORS as mentioned above.
Much regards, Michele.
CORRECTIONS to the EDITOR
Mail On Sunday
6th June 2008
Dear Sir,
It has, belatedly, come to my attention that in your Mail on Sunday edition
of 16th December 2007, headlined “Banned” in the print version (and in the
online version: “Labour Donor Banned from taking Beauty Queen to Club
because of her views on Holocaust”) you relate with considerable half-page,
full colour prominence an entirely fabricated tale, purportedly about me.
I have never been invited to dine at the Reform Club (or anywhere) by Mr
David Abrahams, the multi-millionaire property developer at the centre of
the “Donorgate” scandal. Your sources must have been aware of the indelible
stain on my reputation left by such a fabrication, an invented association
between me and someone then at the centre of serious criminal allegations,
which resulted in the resignation of the Labour Party’s general secretary.
Moreover your story, amid numerous inaccuracies, relies upon tabloid
mischaracterisations and plausible nonsense about my family to deflect from
the real issue of Abrahams’ secret “arrangement which broke electoral law”*.
This baseless story serves a P.R. agenda, appearing within days of Mr
Abrahams’ hiring P.R. agent Martin Minns as widely reported. Though the Mail
itself had run a headline exposing Mr Abrahams’ “Fantasy World”, your paper
uncritically peddled fantasy masquarading as fact.
Several readers have pointed out to me their impression that by this ruse
your paper (intentionally or otherwise) in depicting a tiny photo of Mr
Abrahams looking the shocked innocent out-of-towner, placed literally at
Lady Renouf’s feet in a huge picture as if a blonde beast, gives the P.R.
impression that this suddenly notorious Jewish political operator could be
viewed as fallen prey to a “Holocaust denier”, a misleading characterisation
which this article intends to equate to “anti-Semite”.
Given the many blatant untruths in your story concerning me, I would be
satisfied if you kindly published a full retraction and apology.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-502609/Labour-donor-David-Abrahams-b
anned-taking-beauty-queen-club–views-Holocaust.html
* Jewish Chronicle 7 December 2007
Yours truly
Michèle, Lady Renouf
tel/fax: 0207 460 7453
PO Box 18812
London SW7 4WD
—————————————————————————-
—
The Jewish Chronicle
Correction to the Editor
5th June 2008
Dear Sir
By way of correction to David Toube’s column in the Jewish Chronicle (30th
May 2008) I would like to clarify for the record that I am not and never
have been a member or advocate of Mr Nick Griffin’s British National Party;
on the contrary, I have criticized the Holocaustianity (i.e. faith-based
versus forensic-based) ethos of his Party and in consequence, despite having
been invited by a member, I was banned from promoting my film “Jailing
Opinions” at one of its branch meetings.
Evening Standard Diary lead item “Lady Renouf is too extreme even for the
BNP”, 20th November 2006 (in which the ES uses a photo of the wrong
Renouf!).
http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/07/01/EvStd_1106.html
Nor am I a member of the literary forum called the New Right, though I have
been invited and several times have been delighted to address this cheerful
gathering, whose civil audiences welcome widely differing political and
religious outlooks, and which could not rationally be described as a
“neo-Nazi” group.
I am of course proud to acknowledge my address at the December 2006 Tehran
Conference on Review of the Holocaust, which was open to all scholarly sides
of debate, as opposed to the recent anti-Revisionism, one-sided,
government-sponsored Berlin Conference on revisionists (i.e. those who
forensically call into question the scientific impossibility of the “gas
chamber” weapon of mass destruction) which shamelessly disallows, against
all natural justice, the presence of even a single historical or scientific
source-sceptic.
Sad to say the truth is the very reverse of the racist Jewish Chronicle’s
demonising of Iran as a “vicious authoritarian regime”. The fact is that in
ten supposedly democratic countries of the “Free World”, citizens and even
non-citizens (for example, British WW2 historian David Irving) including
engineers, chemists, forensic scientists and their lawyers are imprisoned
for merely expressing source critical opinions (i.e. historical revisionism,
the norm in any other field and teaching guide but specifically not for The
Holocaust), or for carrying out field research (normal scientific
revisionism). Indeed, Israel has recently banned Professor Norman
Finkelstein, the author of the huckster-busting book “The Holocaust
Industry”, from entry not least because Israel is one of the ten European
countries in which this Jewish professor, classifiable as a “denier”, could
embarrass the Jewish state by risking his own prosecution there, for
anti-”denial” law means no source scepticism in “full or part” according to
an Israeli-drafted U.N. Resolution. (Look what happened to Vanunu the
Israeli nukes whistle-blower who was jailed in that vicious authoritarian
entity for eighteen years and still kept unfree to take his leave of Jewish
tyranny for warning the world of the rogue state’s secret WMD arsenal.)
Even in Voltaire’s “Free” France, retired Professor Robert Faurisson is
awaiting the outcome of prosecution - devastating fines and possibly long
imprisonment - for simply speaking an excerpt from his revisionist paper
presented at the Tehran Conference.
www.jailingopinions.com/Victoires révisionnisme ENG.pdf
It is worth stressing that such prosecutions are brought purely for
expressing dissenting views on Holocaust history, regardless of context.
Revisionists and their legal advocates are imprisoned without being able to
defend the forensic or factual basis of their arguments. This is a strict
liability offence which does not require any suggestion that their
activities involved “racial hatred” or the like. In Austria, a special
ageist law has been drawn up to prevent the veteran Austrian attorney Dr.
Herbert Schaller (who, on appeal, successfully defended a British historian
against the state prosecutor’s wish to extend Irving’s incarceration from
three to ten years, one for each harmless word he uttered when asked a
question sixteen years ago!) from continuing to practice. Dr Schaller is
also awaiting the outcome of possible prosecution for outlining the legal
position of revisionists in Europe at a conference outside its jurisdiction.
By contrast one can only praise the debate-friendly policy of the admirable
Press TV which brings all sides to the table. Thus, praise indeed to the
Iranian initiative which beams much longed for democratic balance to the
“Free World’s” heavily biased public information outlets. For instance, our
mainstream media proves its grotesque propaganda bias by regularly
substituting with misleading voice-overs, nasty interpretations of
fore-shortened and incomplete public statements, from President Ahmadinejad
of Iran to the Orthodox Rabbis of the Neturei Karta. Their peaceful
solutions are vilified even as each has expressed a reasoned wish to see the
Zionist Entity “peacefully dismantled” and erased from the world map like
the Soviet Union i.e. the political entity NOT the people!
The facts are that Iran is a peace-loving country in which its Jews are not
in any way abused; as opposed to the brutish state policy of a predatory
borderless Entity of Israel towards its indigenous, genuinely Semitic and
helplessly victimised Arabs. Your newspaper’s characteristic demonising of
Israel’s opponents cannot disguise these facts, nor can it obscure the race
supremacist imposture inherent in the Zionist project.
If defending rational source sceptical research on the one hand, and
even-handed television reporting on the other, leaves me accused of “forging
links” between “neo-Nazis” and “Islamic fundamentalists”, then perhaps this
reveals more about our Humpty Dumpty democracy and its fraudulent media
contrariwise constructs than about my character or conduct.
Yours truly
Michèle, Lady Renouf
tel/fax 0207 460 7453
PO Box 18812, London SW7 4WD
Article in question was headlined: “Now on TV in the UK: Iranian
Shoah-denial”
http://www.thejc.com/home.aspx?ParentId=m12s127
—————————–
Published Letter to the Editor from Science Historian Dr. Nicholas
Kollerstrom re article
http://www.thejc.com/home.aspx?ParentId=m12s30
0 Responses to “Lady Michele Renouf Reports from London on broad global media Revisionist developments and democracy…”
Leave a Reply