Comments on: New research refutes myth of pure Scandinavian race http://www.thecivicplatform.com/2008/06/10/new-research-refutes-myth-of-pure-scandinavian-race/ The Civic Platform has been launched to discuss and debate issues related to the West viewed as a cultural compound of Greco-Roman, Christian, and Germanic past. We firmly believe that race informs culture and is a necessary precondition for cultural identity and integrity. Hence, this political vehicle is dedicated to the preservation of the ethnic genetic interests (EGI) of people of European ancestry. Furthermore, since the West faces a demographic crisis of unprecedented proportions (for example, in 1950 Whites represented 30 percent of the world's population. This number will plummet to 8 percent by 2050), we hold that the current trends threatening the racial, historical, and cultural identities of people of European ancestry must be stopped and reversed, if the West is to survive and endure as a distinct racial, historical, and cultural entity. Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:25:32 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Riaz Sobrany http://www.thecivicplatform.com/2008/06/10/new-research-refutes-myth-of-pure-scandinavian-race/comment-page-1/#comment-29066 Riaz Sobrany Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:26:43 +0000 http://www.thecivicplatform.com/2008/06/10/new-research-refutes-myth-of-pure-scandinavian-race/#comment-29066 The out of Africa theory is a dirty 19th century lie. It was originally intended to portray Africans as a primitive inferior race, and Europeans as a modern refined race. Little did the proponents of such a theory realise its consequences for Europeans in the 21st century. The out of Africa theory is a dirty 19th century lie. It was originally intended to portray Africans as a primitive inferior race, and Europeans as a modern refined race. Little did the proponents of such a theory realise its consequences for Europeans in the 21st century.

]]> By: Friedrich Braun http://www.thecivicplatform.com/2008/06/10/new-research-refutes-myth-of-pure-scandinavian-race/comment-page-1/#comment-29042 Friedrich Braun Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:00:10 +0000 http://www.thecivicplatform.com/2008/06/10/new-research-refutes-myth-of-pure-scandinavian-race/#comment-29042 "This is remarkably absurd. Assuming we take the “Out of Africa” theory as fact for the sake of argument, this still does not change the fact that there are different races who developed different traits/characteristics as a result of geographic separation and adaptation to new environments. To purposefully ignore history is to ignore important cultural and genetic development. To say that your average Dane has no real ethnic identity and is mixed with all sorts of racial groups, is of course, wrong." Good points. What was her point besides giving some sort of "we're all Africans and immigrants" political speech? It's amazing how political the academia in the West is on the issue of race and immigration. It just boggles the mind how much dishonestly there is. “This is remarkably absurd. Assuming we take the “Out of Africa” theory as fact for the sake of argument, this still does not change the fact that there are different races who developed different traits/characteristics as a result of geographic separation and adaptation to new environments. To purposefully ignore history is to ignore important cultural and genetic development. To say that your average Dane has no real ethnic identity and is mixed with all sorts of racial groups, is of course, wrong.”

Good points. What was her point besides giving some sort of “we’re all Africans and immigrants” political speech? It’s amazing how political the academia in the West is on the issue of race and immigration. It just boggles the mind how much dishonestly there is.

]]> By: Darren http://www.thecivicplatform.com/2008/06/10/new-research-refutes-myth-of-pure-scandinavian-race/comment-page-1/#comment-29039 Darren Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:40:34 +0000 http://www.thecivicplatform.com/2008/06/10/new-research-refutes-myth-of-pure-scandinavian-race/#comment-29039 Oh, and one last point: How come, if the Iron Age Danes were so diverse, that that diversity is not reflected in the genetic heritage of present-Day Danes (immigrants, of course aside)? Oh, and one last point:

How come, if the Iron Age Danes were so diverse, that that diversity is not reflected in the genetic heritage of present-Day Danes (immigrants, of course aside)?

]]> By: Darren http://www.thecivicplatform.com/2008/06/10/new-research-refutes-myth-of-pure-scandinavian-race/comment-page-1/#comment-29038 Darren Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:13:37 +0000 http://www.thecivicplatform.com/2008/06/10/new-research-refutes-myth-of-pure-scandinavian-race/#comment-29038 Well, the nordic racial type that dominates that area isn't indigenous to that part of the world, it wandered there from eastern and central europe ( http://white-history.com/hwr5_files/flood4.jpg ). The people buried there are not necessarily the ancestors of your average Dane. That is like saying that, in 2000 years in the future, some scientist digging up a the remains of a Negro corpse coming to the conclusion that that Negro MUST be related to the whites as as well. This is really shoddy research that is jumping to conclusions that generally contradict well-established anthropology for a purely political purpose (to subvert racial and ethnic identity). "Indeed, Danish identity is more a definition of where one is physically located and lives today than a question of our past history - since we're all originally african in origin. That we ended up in Europe was accidental, which is in itself remarkable" This is remarkably absurd. Assuming we take the "Out of Africa" theory as fact for the sake of argument, this still does not change the fact that there are different races who developed different traits/characteristics as a result of geographic separation and adaptation to new environments. To purposefully ignore history is to ignore important cultural and genetic development. To say that your average Dane has no real ethnic identity and is mixed with all sorts of racial groups, is of course, wrong. Well, the nordic racial type that dominates that area isn’t indigenous to that part of the world, it wandered there from eastern and central europe ( http://white-history.com/hwr5_files/flood4.jpg ).

The people buried there are not necessarily the ancestors of your average Dane. That is like saying that, in 2000 years in the future, some scientist digging up a the remains of a Negro corpse coming to the conclusion that that Negro MUST be related to the whites as as well.

This is really shoddy research that is jumping to conclusions that generally contradict well-established anthropology for a purely political purpose (to subvert racial and ethnic identity).

“Indeed, Danish identity is more a definition of where one is physically located and lives today than a question of our past history - since we’re all originally african in origin. That we ended up in Europe was accidental, which is in itself remarkable”

This is remarkably absurd. Assuming we take the “Out of Africa” theory as fact for the sake of argument, this still does not change the fact that there are different races who developed different traits/characteristics as a result of geographic separation and adaptation to new environments. To purposefully ignore history is to ignore important cultural and genetic development. To say that your average Dane has no real ethnic identity and is mixed with all sorts of racial groups, is of course, wrong.

]]>