Comments on: Pat Buchanan: ‘after Wannsee the the trains began to roll’ http://www.thecivicplatform.com/2008/06/21/pat-buchanan-after-wannsee-the-the-trains-began-to-roll/ The Civic Platform has been launched to discuss and debate issues related to the West viewed as a cultural compound of Greco-Roman, Christian, and Germanic past. We firmly believe that race informs culture and is a necessary precondition for cultural identity and integrity. Hence, this political vehicle is dedicated to the preservation of the ethnic genetic interests (EGI) of people of European ancestry. Furthermore, since the West faces a demographic crisis of unprecedented proportions (for example, in 1950 Whites represented 30 percent of the world's population. This number will plummet to 8 percent by 2050), we hold that the current trends threatening the racial, historical, and cultural identities of people of European ancestry must be stopped and reversed, if the West is to survive and endure as a distinct racial, historical, and cultural entity. Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:09:42 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: 123 http://www.thecivicplatform.com/2008/06/21/pat-buchanan-after-wannsee-the-the-trains-began-to-roll/#comment-29248 123 Sun, 22 Jun 2008 13:17:06 +0000 http://www.thecivicplatform.com/2008/06/21/pat-buchanan-after-wannsee-the-the-trains-began-to-roll/#comment-29248 On a little side note: The blame "planning to conquer the world" placed on Hitler/Germany usually comes from those, who practically had conquered it already, be it the Brits with their empire (1/4 world), Soviet Union (1/6 world), not to talk of the US now controlling perhaps 3/4 of the world etc. Thus even if it were true, what do these people issuing such nonsense think they are doing. And how incredibly stupid must be those actually falling for it. If this "planning to conquer the world" is a reason to make war with Germany, should there not have been a war much earlier to stop the Brits, Russians etc. from not only planning, but actual conquests of (parts of) the world. Or is it perhaps perfectly OK for the latter to conquer the world, but not for the former? On a little side note:

The blame “planning to conquer the world” placed on Hitler/Germany usually comes from those, who practically had conquered it already, be it the Brits with their empire (1/4 world), Soviet Union (1/6 world), not to talk of the US now controlling perhaps 3/4 of the world etc. Thus even if it were true, what do these people issuing such nonsense think they are doing. And how incredibly stupid must be those actually falling for it.

If this “planning to conquer the world” is a reason to make war with Germany, should there not have been a war much earlier to stop the Brits, Russians etc. from not only planning, but actual conquests of (parts of) the world. Or is it perhaps perfectly OK for the latter to conquer the world, but not for the former?

]]>