8 Comments »

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

1. Here is exactly what I dislike about populist parties like Flemish Interest, SNP and even BNP. They are striving for a ‘operation a success, patient lost’ scenario. Time to set aside such differences and strive primarily for healthy foundations that let our European societies strive!

   Comment by Der Vermittler — July 22, 2008 #

2. I meant thrive naturally.

   What’s everyone’s opinion on the E&R concept anyway? Trying to get the immigrant community to contribute to the nationalist cause is quite the dilemma.

   Comment by Der Vermittler — July 22, 2008 #

3. The only way that the “immigrant community” can contribute to the “nationalist cause” is by moving back to their countries of origin.

   Comment by Friedrich Braun — July 22, 2008 #

4. “What’s everyone’s opinion on the E&R concept anyway?” ( — Vermittler)

   Does Soral deal honestly with race? From the videos I’ve seen I’d say no. If he doesn’t, I have no interest in his outfit whatever it may advocate. If you don’t see race you are zero. Nothing. You don’t exist.

   Comment by Fred Scrooby — July 22, 2008 #

5. Soral is a Marxist, deeply influenced by dialectical materialism. Marxists deny that race exists (although Marx didn’t). He’s of very limited use to me…although he’s fairly good on the Jewish Question. When I listen to him, I get the impression that he talks faster than he thinks. Further, one can tell that he hasn’t thought through many issues regarding immigration, race, etc. He vascilates, he’s uncertain, he struggles, he’s in pain. He’s not an accomplished, mature thinker…yet.

   For example, listen to his interview with fdsouche. Now, admittedly fdsouche is rather lame and inarticulate and stutters when pressed (and Soral has a rapid-fire, intimidating way of speaking to begin with), but one just knows that his heart is in the right place…I can’t say the same about Soral.

   http://www.dailymotion.com/relevance/search/soral%2Binterview%2Bpart/1

   Generally, I distrust those new “comrades” who come from the extreme Left. Only yesterday they were our worst enemies…and now they seem to talk the talk on some issues…but not all the way…and they distort what’s left of the original message.

   Comment by Friedrich Braun — July 22, 2008 #

6. Thanks for that link. I’m going to listen to those Fdsouche interviews to see what he says about race. I just listened to the beginning of part 1. (He does talk fast, by the way, you’re right about that, but lots of Parisians do.) He devotes a lot of energy, as many Frogs do, to talking about what’s “left” and what’s “right.” All that’s a sideshow and a one-hundred-percent waste of time. There are only normalness and degenerateness. That’s it. Nothing else.

   Comment by Fred Scrooby — July 23, 2008 #

7. “Generally, I distrust those new ‘comrades’ who come from the extreme Left.” ( — FB)

   OK, but it pains me when you include Horst Mahler in that. I have no distrust of him, though why he granted that interview to Michel Friedman (who promptly got him thrown back in jail, at age 70 no less!, for “hate” or for “giving the Roman salute” or for whatever it was that filthy piece of sickening Jewish disease denounced him for) I can’t understand.

   Comment by Fred Scrooby — July 23, 2008 #

8. The only way that the “immigrant community” can contribute to the “nationalist cause” is by moving back to their countries of origin.

   No it isn’t; it’s by making the case that immigrants should repatriate to their countries of origin.

   You can think of me what you like, but that’s exactly my position. You gain nothing by having me leave now, on my own, saying nothing. Somehow I suspect you’ll be too thick to realize the value I provide.

   Comment by silver — August 6, 2008 #

Leave a comment

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website

XHTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>