Éclatement de la Yougoslavie : un ancien indépendantiste croate témoigne de son désenchantement

La Croatie est un vrai laboratoire pour étudier le phénomène de l’identité mimétique pris au sens large. Ce petit État se prête idéalement à une bonne étude d’un pays «malgré soi» et de la façon dont l’américanisme joue un rôle déterminant dans la formation de sa conscience nationale. Dans une large mesure, la symbolique identitaire et la mauvaise appréhension de l’Autre furent à l’origine du conflit serbo-croate. A l’époque, les nationalistes croates ne pouvaient se définir sans afficher leurs sentiments antiserbes; aujourd’hui, en raison de nouvelles données géopolitiques, on se demande s’ils peuvent fonctionner sans pour autant singer l’américanisme.

8 Responses to “Éclatement de la Yougoslavie : un ancien indépendantiste croate témoigne de son désenchantement”


  1. 1 Der Vermittler

    Here is exactly what I dislike about populist parties like Flemish Interest, SNP and even BNP. They are striving for a ‘operation a success, patient lost’ scenario. Time to set aside such differences and strive primarily for healthy foundations that let our European societies strive!

  2. 2 Der Vermittler

    I meant thrive naturally.

    What’s everyone’s opinion on the E&R concept anyway? Trying to get the immigrant community to contribute to the nationalist cause is quite the dilemma.

  3. 3 Friedrich Braun

    The only way that the “immigrant community” can contribute to the “nationalist cause” is by moving back to their countries of origin.

  4. 4 Fred Scrooby

    “What’s everyone’s opinion on the E&R concept anyway?” ( — Vermittler)

    Does Soral deal honestly with race? From the videos I’ve seen I’d say no. If he doesn’t, I have no interest in his outfit whatever it may advocate. If you don’t see race you are zero. Nothing. You don’t exist.

  5. 5 Friedrich Braun

    Soral is a Marxist, deeply influenced by dialectical materialism. Marxists deny that race exists (although Marx didn’t). He’s of very limited use to me…although he’s fairly good on the Jewish Question. When I listen to him, I get the impression that he talks faster than he thinks. Further, one can tell that he hasn’t thought through many issues regarding immigration, race, etc. He vascilates, he’s uncertain, he struggles, he’s in pain. He’s not an accomplished, mature thinker…yet.

    For example, listen to his interview with fdsouche. Now, admittedly fdsouche is rather lame and inarticulate and stutters when pressed (and Soral has a rapid-fire, intimidating way of speaking to begin with), but one just knows that his heart is in the right place…I can’t say the same about Soral.

    http://www.dailymotion.com/relevance/search/soral%2Binterview%2Bpart/1

    Generally, I distrust those new “comrades” who come from the extreme Left. Only yesterday they were our worst enemies…and now they seem to talk the talk on some issues…but not all the way…and they distort what’s left of the original message.

  6. 6 Fred Scrooby

    Thanks for that link. I’m going to listen to those Fdsouche interviews to see what he says about race. I just listened to the beginning of part 1. (He does talk fast, by the way, you’re right about that, but lots of Parisians do.) He devotes a lot of energy, as many Frogs do, to talking about what’s “left” and what’s “right.” All that’s a sideshow and a one-hundred-percent waste of time. There are only normalness and degenerateness. That’s it. Nothing else.

  7. 7 Fred Scrooby

    “Generally, I distrust those new ‘comrades’ who come from the extreme Left.” ( — FB)

    OK, but it pains me when you include Horst Mahler in that. I have no distrust of him, though why he granted that interview to Michel Friedman (who promptly got him thrown back in jail, at age 70 no less!, for “hate” or for “giving the Roman salute” or for whatever it was that filthy piece of sickening Jewish disease denounced him for) I can’t understand.

  8. 8 silver

    The only way that the “immigrant community” can contribute to the “nationalist cause” is by moving back to their countries of origin.

    No it isn’t; it’s by making the case that immigrants should repatriate to their countries of origin.

    You can think of me what you like, but that’s exactly my position. You gain nothing by having me leave now, on my own, saying nothing. Somehow I suspect you’ll be too thick to realize the value I provide.

Leave a Reply