The Brits’ Most Heinous Crime

Published
by
Friedrich Braun
on August 5, 2008
in Crime, Law and Military Matters
.

Between 1940 and 1945, sixty-one German cities with a total population of 25 millions were destroyed or devastated in a bombing campaign initiated by the British government. Destruction on this scale had no other purpose than the indiscriminate mass murder of as many German people as possible quite regardless of their civilian status. It led to retaliatory bombing resulting in 60,000 British dead and 86,000 injured. The British and the USA also bombed France, resulting in 60,000 civilian dead.

3 Responses to “The Brits’ Most Heinous Crime”

Feed for this Entry Trackback Address
  1. 1 Phoebus_412
    August 6, 2008 at 3:10 am

    My so-called ‘White Guilt’ died when I first learned about the Firebombing of Dresden.

    At least with the atomic bombings of japan the Americans could say “gee we didn’t know it would do that since these weapons haven’t been used before’. Also the atom bombs were used as more of a knock-out blow to end the war in the Pacific whereas the bombing campaign against my Fatherland (I am ethnic German residing in USA) was done by the blood-thirsty alcoholic Churchill (who may have been part jewish) to try and kill as many innocent White civilians as possible.

    In the comic book version of History Leader Hitler is described as an evil maniac who wanted to rule the world… but in reality he was truly a Noble Warrior who NEVER considered even using chemical weapons like mustard gas. If Hitler was so Evil why didn’t he order some V2s launched at the English with a payload of nerve agents??!?!?!?!??!?

  2. 2 Friedrich Braun
    August 6, 2008 at 6:39 am

    “Also the atom bombs were used as more of a knock-out blow to end the war in the Pacific…”

    Not true. The Japanese wanted to surrender well before Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Unofortunately for the Japanese, Truman wanted to impress upon Stalin how tough he was.

    http://www.signandsight.com/features/93.html

    http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v16/v16n3p-4_Weber.html

  3. 3 Phoebus_412
    August 7, 2008 at 12:57 am

    I stand corrected!

    One can just about always trust Mark Weber. (petty differences betwixt him and Wills Carto aren’t really that important)

Leave a Reply