Do you really think that the Master Race was not an outrageous idea in the 1930s, repugnant to the entire world?
Adolf Hitler’s views on race weren’t particularly “outrageous” or spectacular. And didn’t differ from those held by English eugenicists during that same period.
Or the slave-labour that flowed from it?
Nothing comparable to the British famine policy in India ever occurred during the time of the Third Reich.
As B.M. Bhatia writes in his 1967 book, Famines in India: From about the beginning of the eleventh century to the end of the eighteenth there were 14 major famines in India.” This is roughly two per century. Under the period of East India Company rule from 1765-1858 there occurred 16 major famines, a rate eight times higher than what had been common before. Then, under the period of British Colonial Office rule from 1859 to 1914, there was a major famine in India an average of every two years, or 25 times the historical rate before British rule! The rest of the world’s population was growing due to technological progress, but the population of India remained at approximately 220 million for over a century prior to 1914.
Deliberately inducing a major famine more or less every two years, was, for over half a century, the backbone of British colonial policy in India.
Or the militarisation of society?
How Germans decide to order their society shouldn’t be any of your business.
Or the violent appropriation of other peoples’ homelands?
A Brit would know a thing or two about “the violent appropriaton of other peoples’ homelands.”
Did the world want to see Germany made “great and powerful” by such means? Or do you think it might eventually be forced to resist?
The “world”? You mean Britain, of course.
If those brit soldiers in their graves from WWII could see the “modern” world we have now, they would have gladly made peace with Germany. They would have sought out those few individuals who were making world war seem inevitable. Like those in the US responsible for transferring entire munitions and aircraft factories to Communist Russia, propping up the bolshevik butchers. Does our brit hero not care to explain how we allied with these murderers of 20plus million innocents in Russia? Does our Brit not care to explain how they themselves created the original death camps to starve the women and children of the Boers in Africa? No, that’s not important, otherwise, we’d all be seeing movies about it right and books would still be coming out about it right? Lies and omissions have formed their worldview.
Its amazing that after the horrifying useless slaughter of WWI, that it took only 25 years to convince the British people to cut off their other leg and lay prostrate for the 3rd world to swarm over them. That is the power of the media, that it can convince individuals that committing suicide is healthy and noble. These myths die hard, even as Britain sinks further into oblivion, these noble “lions” sit back, pat themselves on the back and tell themselves what a wonderful world they have made and how horrible any alternative would have been. How many more books and movies promoting these myths must we endure?
Any war that requires the government to send its troops to dark movie theaters to explain why they should hate and kill their enemy, is a fraud.
911 was modern street theater, a live action Why We Fight, staged for the “real world” generation. They “saw it with their own eyes” live on TV, our generation’s false flag Pearl Harbor. Problem. Reaction. Solution.
They say men lose their minds together, and regain them one at a time.
I imagine that many Union soldiers from the Civil War would either throw down their rifles or refuse to be drafted if they could see the destruction that free Negroes have caused to the Republic.
“Does our Brit not care to explain how they themselves created the original death camps to starve the women and children of the Boers in Africa?”
That’s a good point.