More on the neurotic.
The notion that Krauts were the masters of the world was a bad joke, rendered hilarious by all the goose-stepping and uniforms.
Guessedworker’s compatriot, Houston Stewart Chamberlain, and the Frenchman Arthur de Gobineau, didn’t think that the “notion of Krauts were the master of the world was a bad joke…” Unlike Guessedworker, both pre-eminent racialists of the 19th Century were Germanophiles, or, as they’ve been called: “Prophets of Teutonism.” So, contrary to Guessedworker, the thought was never a “bad joke.” On the contray, Germanism was rather the norm in many intellectual circles. Again, Guessedworker is ahistorically projecting his own anti-German feelings. The fact that it’s a joke to him doesn’t mean that strong pro-German sentiments didn’t exist among most racialist, anti-liberal European doctrinaires, authors, and thinkers of the 19th century and early 20th century..
A great deal of Brits, Frenchmen, Americans, etc. (i.e., and not only Guessedworker’s stupid bogeyman, “German-Americans”) of Guessedworker’s age or generation have come to appreciate the nature of the W.W. II and the forces behind it. Guessedworker hasn’t reached that point yet. Which, in my opinion, makes him psychologically immature (”my daddy hated them Krauts and so will I!”), and ultimately harmful to our interests as White men and women. That’s another reason why I find MR of very limited use and frequent its pages less and less. I will probably abstain altogether soon. Even a paleocon Catholic like Buchanan is better on W.W. II and the surrounding questions than Guessedworker, what does that tell you?
I think that some texts that can help to explain Guessedworker’s frequent cavalcade of insults (”Krauts”) hatred and disparagment of Germans (he really can’t help himself! His outbursts are increasing in frequency, another curioso) can be found here:
Dr. Michael F. Connors
Dealing in Hate: The development of anti-German propaganda
GRENFELL, Captain Russel, R.N.
Unconditional Hatred, German War Guilt and the Future of Europe
“Mr. Churchill was not a statesman seeking always his own country’s advantage amid the twists and turns of a dangerous world. He was an international crusader preaching and conducting a holy war for the destruction of the Hitler regime and the German military power at any cost; at any cost to his own country and the rest of the world. In his own words, there was no sacrifice he would not make to get rid of Hitler, although up to the British declaration of war against Germany in 1939 Hitler had done no harm to Britain and had actually gone out of his way to placate her at some sacrifice to German pride by agreeing to keep the German fleet at a third of the strength of the British. Mr. Churchill’s war policy was not national but religious.”
John Ramsden’s Don’t Mention the War is also useful to understand the development of anti-German hate in Great Britain:
By Prof. Emil Schlee
By Steffen Werner
Interesting. I am completely new to your, and the MR blogs. Are there any blogging sites you could recommend? I would consider myself a “Germanophile”, if for no other reason then for the fact that I have Prussian blood in me.
You’ll find the sites that I find of interest in my Links Directory above.
The whole Nazi notion of “Germans as the master race” really wasn’t a very important concept or idea during the reign of the Nazis and was only discussed by the Nazi intellectual, professorial, and social elite.
The whole concept certainly wasn’t widely known or propagated amongst the German masses, though it may have been mentioned here and there by teachers who held strong Nazi sympathies.
The idea that Germans during the ‘Nazizeit’ were utterly and wholly obsessed with “Germans as the master race” has only been promoted by sensationalistic Jewish historians who want to cause a stir or make a buck…usually both. They blew the whole thing out of proportion — typical Jewish hyperbole.
Right. The Third Reich was surrounded by enemies while trying to overcome serious economic problems and an important communist/terrorist minority at home. The idea that they spent their days dreaming up theories regarding their superiority is for the birds, or the Guessedworkers of the world.
“Mr. Churchill was not a statesman seeking always his own country’s advantage amid the twists and turns of a dangerous world. He was an international crusader preaching and conducting a holy war for the destruction of the Hitler regime…”
He was only against Hitler in the sense, that Hitler had committed the crime to make Germany strong. If Hitler would have been like todays Mrs. Merkel (incredible, that both are to stem from the same stock), he would have been absolutely at ease with both Hitler and national- socialism. The thrust was clearly against Germany and not against national socialism as such, as he clearly stated repeatedly before the war, something like “Germany is getting too strong, it must be destroyed” plus others. Still, even Churchill recognized immediately after the war that he had “slaughtered the wrong pig” (sorry, I have no references at hand, have read these quotes in several books).
So, I would say that GW at MR is more than 60 years behind the curve. Disgusting.
One cannot really blame any WNs simply because they parrot the Kosher Line on NS Germany.
Unless one takes the initiative to do the research and books that tell the truth are hard to come by, then it only follows that they will repeat what they were taught.
Knowledge IS power.
http://www.theneworder.org/news/thegoodsociety.htm
“Still, even Churchill recognized immediately after the war that he had “slaughtered the wrong pig” (sorry, I have no references at hand, have read these quotes in several books).”
You won’t find an authentic source, 123, as Churchill never said anything of the sort. In other words, it’s a post-war myth.
Friedrich,
I don’t want to start an argument with you, but
this phrase was repeatedly stated by Emil Maier-Dorn, and he gave references. Unfortunately my wife has messed around with my books, so I can’t just find it.
Anyhow, it is not really important, as from several independent sources it is well known, that Churchill was very concerned with the situation in Europe immediately after the end of the war, I believe even in his memoirs he mentioned it. Until that end he was all emotion, just pre-occupied with the destruction of Germany and the Germans by all and any means. The moment the dust started to settle a little he realized, that there was (too) little, that could stop the Soviets from just marching on and taking the rest of Europe. He tried to convince some high ranking Americans, who were rather confused and stated, that he was saying the same as Hitler. So that phrase is not supposed to imply, that he suddenly fell in love with Germans. He only then realized, that his hatred of Germans had made him commit a major strategic blunder. As we have found out by now, it was even from the British point of view more than just a strategic blunder (even if his immediate concern did not come about).
All this makes me wonder, what GW’s work at MR is about. It cannot possibly be furthering the interest of whites/Europeans in general, as this would require to oppose WW1 and WW2. As these wars cannot be undone, the efforts would have to be to rectify the wrongs of these wars as much as possible, thereby reconciling the varying white peoples with each other, with all the positives this would mean for our survival. The way I see it, the British had entered a pact with the devil (jews) a long time ago, which gave them a lot of advantages at the time, but now come the drawbacks and they are seriously feeling the pinch even in their homeland. GW would like to see this undone, and probably a return of the glorious old times of “Britannia rules the waves”.
Well, a lot of this is speculation, but one thing for me is clear: as GW and MR are not serious about saving the white race, but at best a subset there-off, for me MR is no longer of any relevance whatsoever.
David Irving says that Churchill never said it. I trust him on this point.
Guessedworker has said that his father and uncles were in the R.A.F., to me it means that his immediate family members are genocidal mass murderers of the German people. His father and uncles are responsible for the fire-bombing of Hamburg, Dresden, etc. They burned yours and my family alive. The only think they would get from me is a bullet between the eyes. He comes from that stock, he comes from a line of mass murderers and torturers of Germans.
123, you should consider writing for this blog. You have lots to contribute.
Friedrich,
thank you for your offer.
I really feel honored by it. However, at this time I do not have the time for such a job. But I do expect things to become better in the not so far future, and then I would gladly do so. I’ll contact you, when things have progressed sufficiently.
Guessedworker’s anti-German position is both intellectually untenable and unworthy of someone who, were it not for this characteristically blinkered English attitude, would deserve considerable respect for his sterling efforts in the cause of ethno-nationalism and also for his belated Damascene conversion to such Jew awareness as alarmed Martin Hutchinson and brought an admittedly overdue end to the pro-miscegenation meanderings of John Ray.
123, it would be great to have you on board. You could post in German and English. I’ve recently invited someone from Elsass-Lothringen who’s going to post in French, German, and English. No other blog, to my knowledge, is trilingual.
Captainchaos, you’re not welcome to post on this blog.
Good bye.