Robert FAURISSON November 9, 2008
Another hackneyed Auschwitz “revelation”!
The latest issue of the German mass-circulation daily Bild announces the recent discovery of new documents on Auschwitz, writing, in particular, that one of them seems to prove the existence of a homicidal gas chamber in that camp. In Berlin , Hans-Dieter Kreikamp, head of the Federal Archives, thinks that in this “discovery” he has found the way to silence the revisionists.
In reality, there is strictly nothing new about this type of document, and the building plans of the “gas chamber” in question (Gaskammer, fully spelt out) are those of a simple “delousing facility” (Entlausungsanlage, fully spelt out as well).
Besides, a passage in the Bild article demonstrates the unease of our fraudsters. Here it is in German, followed by an English translation: “Dass in der 11,66 mal 11,20 Meter großen „Gaskammer“ nicht Kleidungsstücke mit dem bei der SS üblichen Blausäure-Mittel entlaust, sondern Menschen vergast werden sollten, muss als sehr wahrscheinlich angenommen werden.” “It must be considered very likely that in this 11.66 by 11.20-meter ‘gas chamber’ it was not garments that were deloused in the SS’s usual way with hydrogen cyanide, but that it was human beings who must have been gassed.”
The reader will have noted: “It must be considered very likely […] that it was human beings who must have been gassed.”
This passage was left out of the articles in the French or English-language press which have, so far, come to my attention and which claim to quote Bild.
I shall permit here myself to remind readers that I was the first in the world to publish the building plans for the Auschwitz crematoria supposed to have housed homicidal gas chambers; the spaces in question were actually either morgues, an air-raid shelter, or some other innocuous rooms. I discovered those drawings in 1976 in the camp archives and began publishing them with an article in the Spanish magazine Interviu (February 1979), a piece carrying a photo of me holding a sheet with crematorium plans altogether comparable to the ones now shown in Bild. In the nearly thirty years since then, I have never ceased going over the conclusions to be drawn from those plans and from a number of other elements, like the inspection of the purported crime scenes at Auschwitz, or, on the one hand, the scientific bibliography regarding delousing, disinfection or anti-infestation methods using Zyklon B and, on the other hand, the procedure for executing a condemned prisoner with hydrogen cyanide gas as followed in certain American penitentiaries. (Invented shortly after the first world war and still in use today under another name, “Cyanosil”, Zyklon B is a hydrogen cyanide-based substance). From then onwards, nearly all the revisionist researchers (Fred Leuchter, Germar Rudolf, Carlo Mattogno and many others) have made extensive use of those plans or of others still, which Bild discovers today just as someone might discover the moon or the Loch Ness monster. Indeed the anti-revisionists have also, at their end, had to publish these plans and then attempt, though in vain, to challenge the obvious significance thereof. Such was precisely the case with the French pharmacist Jean-Claude Pressac. I’ll recall that he, after having deployed the formidable means put at his disposal by the Klarsfeld couple to uphold “the Holocaust” argument in general and that of the alleged homicidal Auschwitz gas chambers in particular, wound up writing that, all things considered, those arguments were fit only “for the rubbish bins of history” (Valérie Igounet, Histoire du négationnisme en France, Paris, Gallimard, 2000, p. 652).
In the end, the Bild reporter has done nothing but recycle an old rumour.
It remains to be seen whether the Jewish authorities find fault with his clumsiness or, instead, congratulate him for being so willing to help with their propaganda.
At one time I was a major spokesman in my community in support of the the major accepted Holocaust tenets. But after 15 years of intensive study of the revisionist side as well as the Standard Holocaust literature I have had a hard time accepting the so called mass extermination gassing program against the Jewish european population.Yes the Nazis did intern millions of Jews. Yes thousands of Jews were shot (for what ever reasons), yes a multitude of Jews unfortunately died from the diseases in the camps, but the “proof” of the gassing of Jews at all or at the industrial level is much lighter than what most people think.
I beg the general population to read “Night” by Elie Weisel, considered by many as a personal landmark work on the Holocaust by a highly regarded Holocaust promoter. In the original French as well as the first English unabridged edition ,NO WHERE, ABSOLUTELY NOWHERE are gas chambers mentioned in the Auschwitz camp. Only crematory ovens are mentioned. Weisel fears death by burning pits and not gas chambers (again which he never mentions) at the camp. Yes a bit later the German edition of “Night ” conveniantly transformed the word Ovens to Chambers in about 17 different instances. But you must know that Germany after WWII was under big pressure to follow the allied plans, which of course included the promotion of the allied version of the Holocaust. And of course today the penalties for Holocaust denial are intensive under the current German administration.
In final I want to say this: Even if the Nazis committed all of the atrocities that the allies said they did, the German people today should not be put under any pressure whether it be guilt or monetary simply because of this: just about all of the German people today were either children or were not alive at the time of the Holocaust and had nothing to do with what happened or might have happened. Compensation time is done. All war criminals or “criminals” are gone. Stop using the Holocaust as a geo-political weapon. Just about the whole world sees it as such! but are afraid to talk! The truth in time will dominate.
The German article claims: “Everybody who was involved with planning and constructing the concentration camp even in the remotest way knew that people should be gassed factory-like.”
Well, what is *really known* about Auschwitz is the fact that the definite truth about Auschwitz has changed several times considerably. Four million dead? Or one and a half million dead? Is the “gas chamber” original? Where did the gassings take place? Was Edith Stein gassed (yes, the Red Cross claims that, but a Catholic nun who published a biography about Stein in 1948 shows this claim at least to be very doubtful)?
Sure, the article does not deliver any new information; even Robert Jan van Pelt admits this. It’s only importance lies in the message between the lines: Do not ask questions about the holocaust, otherwise you find yourself in prison - or worse.
Father Lingen, what’s the church attendance in Germany these days?
You might like to browse the following Revisionist forum:
http://forum.codoh.com/index.php
and the following works:
Germar Rudolf’s:
‘Lectures on the Holocaust’
http://www.vho.org/store/USA/bresult.php?ID=29
‘Dissecting the Holocaust’
http://www.vho.org/store/USA/bresult.php?ID=38
and for a more technical approach,
‘The Rudolf Report’
http://www.vho.org/store/USA/bresult.php?ID=53
That, the false story about “gas chambers” was their greatest lie and they’ve made billions of dollars from it over the years. It was starting to fall apart and I suspect that is why the 911 “False Flag” operation had to happen, where they blaimed yet another nation for the act they had done themselves.
They are the world’s best liars. Even US Senator Joe Lieberman is now lying and saying that he has “no evidence” that building 7 collapsed on 911 despite the fact the whole world watched it happen. They are still saying that Osama bin Laden did 911 when bin Laden had no access to the Launch Codes that fired the 3 cruse missiles at the Pentagon that day. You can SEE the 3 “exit holes” where the missiles came out the other side of the Pentagon from the airel view of the buildings.
Osama bin Laden also did not have access to the atomic bombs that blew up the WTC on that day. The dust that all the steel and concreat turned to is only 10 microns across, and only small atomic bombs could have blown up the buildings up into such tiny particles.
The people running from the WTC saw cars burst into flames for no reason, and whole parking lots filled with cars were zapped and burned from the shock wave. Cars many blocks away were burned up and melted, even the rubber on the tires was vaporized, showing the steel belted radiel wires that had been hidden inside the rubber. There’s no way that “Arabs” could have planted the atomic bombs that blew up the WTC.
To Mr. Friedrich Braun
I am a “sedevacantist”. If you ask for “church attendance in Germany”, you must be aware of the extinction of the Church in Germany:
http://www.revisionisten.de/extinct.htm
As you see, my homepage has - among others - the URL “revisionisten.de”. In fact, it serves as an important revisionist homepage in Germany with more than 10.000 visits a month. Not much, but better than nothing. The (German) revisionist texts are collected here:
http://www.revisionisten.de/default.htm
I asked two experts (a doctor and a doctorant) to tell me the most important errors in the Rudolf Report. They both couldn’t find any - which made me think. I did have letter contact to Mr. Germar Rudolf until the prison stopped to deliver my letters.
For some reason, Father, your (double) posts get sent to spam and I have to dig them out and unspam them. I don’t know why. I have read your letter and you seem to be fighting the same fight as Monseigneur Lefebvre ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcel_Lefebvre ) did before you. I had a university professor whose uncle was Monseigneur Lefebvre. He was eventually excommunicated by the Church. Are you excommunicated? Maybe you’d like to say a little bit more about yourself. You mention going to prison, did you indeed go to prison? How come your letters aren’t being delivered to Germar Rudolf?
Vatican II was the result of liberalism that swept the European continent and the rest of the western world after W.W. II. However, Protestant sects aren’t in a better shape. Unfortunately, conservative Christianity in the U.S. tends to be fanatically pro-Israel (so-called Christian Zionists).
I would also suggest, Father, that if you want to bring your struggle to international attention you should also produce videos in English. At least from time to time.
To Mr. Braun,
I sent double posts because the first time I forgot to deactivate the script blocker. And then I thought your commentary function is moderated, because my comments did not appear.
Whatever…
Now, as a “sedevacantist”, I do not belong to the Lefebvre group. These guys are “una cum”, i.e. together with the false popes, and “sedevacantism” is prohibited there. The Lefebvre way is absolutely impossible: Either a man is pope - then he has supreme jurisdiction, or he is not - then he does not have supreme jurisdiction. In any way: Lefebvre and his group is OUT.
Concerning Vatican 2, please see:
Joseph Roddy, How The Jews Changed Catholic Thinking, LOOK Magazine, January 25, 1966, Volume 30, No. 2.
http://www.dailycatholic.org/issue/05Jan/jan29agg.htm
My letters to Mr. Rudolf were sent back to me because of their (according to the judge who censors all letters to Rudolf) “revisionist” and “insulting” content.
Fact is: I openly declare that neither me (okay, I am not a chemist) nor the experts I asked could find errors in the Rudolf Report. Futhermore, the law does not clearly declare what you *MUST* believe to be a faithful holocaust believer (how many dead in Auschwitz etc.). On my homepage, I quote a German translation of “What is ‘Holocaust Denial’?” by Barbara Kulaszka and mention the source of the English text:
http://www.ihr.org/leaflets/denial.shtml
In conclusion, I openly call Mr. Rudolf innocent - and his conviction a crime.
Therefore, Germany rejects my letters to Mr. Rudolf as “revisionist” and “insulting”.
An English video? Maybe. I am convicted for simply quoting a statement that not all people in the world consider the “diary of Anne Frank” as original; I myself declared that I do not have an answer to this question. That was enough to condemn me. At least I could write an English article about it and send it to you.
Your posts are still going to the spam folder. I think that it might be because you’ve got links in your posts.
Yes, I would be interested in having you as a contributor, you could write about the lack of freedom in Germany, etc. I see the BRD as suicidal and decadent myself and run by traitors, Jews, and their lackeys. Please let me know if that interests you.
Father Lingen, would you like to tell us why you’re opposed to the Vatican II Church?
Since I’ve read people are routinely, arrested and imprisoned for nothing more than questioning the number of Jews that died in WWII, I don’t believe anything about Jews being systematically murdered by Germans.
Very useful post. where can i find more articles on this subject ?