These are probably the Uighurs, a blend of Tocharians (a Nordic tribe) and Mongoloids. Nowadays, the Uighurs are Muslims.
See also here.
The Civic Platform has been launched to discuss and debate issues related to the West viewed as a cultural compound of Greco-Roman, Christian, and Germanic past. We firmly believe that race informs culture and is a necessary precondition for cultural identity and integrity. Hence, this political vehicle is dedicated to the preservation of the ethnic genetic interests (EGI) of people of European ancestry. Furthermore, since the West faces a demographic crisis of unprecedented proportions (for example, in 1950 Whites represented 30 percent of the world’s population. This number will plummet to 8 percent by 2050), we hold that the current trends threatening the racial, historical, and cultural identities of people of European ancestry must be stopped and reversed, if the West is to survive and endure as a distinct racial, historical, and cultural entity.
These are probably the Uighurs, a blend of Tocharians (a Nordic tribe) and Mongoloids. Nowadays, the Uighurs are Muslims.
See also here.
Late Pleistocene human skulls are of immense interest in reconstructing the evolutionary history of our species Homo sapiens. In the 1980s and 1990s, Kamminga and Wright (1988), Wright (1992), Stringer (1994), Howells (1995), Powell and Neves (1999), and others used multivariate statistics to compare the measurements of late Pleistocene skulls, from China, Africa, Australia, and the Americas, against modern human populations as represented by the worldwide survey of William White Howells (see map at the bottom of this page). One general result that emerged, which was then interpreted as evidence for the “Out of Africa” theory on the origins of modern humans, is that the Pleistocene crania frequently did not find their closest affinity with Howells’s recent populations in the same region. For instance, the landmark paper of Kamminga and Wright (1988) concluded that Zhoukoudien Upper Cave 1 could not be considered “Mongoloid” because its craniometrics are very different from those of recent populations in the region such as Chinese and Buriats. Therefore, one component of my The Contribution of South Asia to the Peopling of Australasia project (with Colin Groves) has involved testing Australian fossil crania with FORDISC 2.0 (Ousley and Jantz 1996), a computer program that facilitates multivariate statistical comparisons of individual crania with the 28 populations measured by Howells (1989).
See also this article here. It seems to be somewhat indicative of the effects of aboriginal peoples movements about the world. While most native American groups in the US have been rather quiet and busy making money in their casinos, many primitive groups are very busy with the help of lawyers wiping the archeological records clean of any evidence that they are even remotely less evolved than say– a German — and removing evidence of their past from the Internet and museums. Skulls and photos that could be found on the internet 5 years ago are now gone. It is, to say the least, a very vile form of censorship.
Note the map linking Australia to New Guinea during the height of the last glacial period here.
“This truly unique collection of mineralised skulls and endocasts, the results of over 30 years fieldwork, presents what can only be described as an indisputable case for the evolution of the earliest modern humans [Homo sapiens] in Australia from Homo erectus, prior to the supposed first appearance of modern humans in Africa around 100,000 years ago, and long before the appearance of the earliest Australoids [Aborigines] in Australia by hundreds of thousands of years.
Continue reading ‘Australian Aboriginal Craniometrics as construed through FORDISC’
Published online before print January 2, 2008
Continue reading ‘Evidence for declines in human population during EUP in Western Europe’
I recently got an email from a Ms. Michelle Azevedo, read it here.
Now we know why cavemen are extinct: They were too stupid to live.
Granted, that’s not a particularly shocking revelation, at least not when it comes to ABC’s Cavemen. Stupidity was one of the hallmarks of this sorry sitcom’s original pilot, which was pulled from the air in part because its racial-prejudice allegory treaded too heavily on African-American stereotypes. Change, however, has come to the world of the cave, and a show that was once dumb and offensive is now dumb and pointless.
The authors haven’t been around bushmeat country lately, where the ape and monkey populations are fast disappearing…eaten by their nigger-animal brothers.
Recent Comments