Jimmy Carter’s book against Israeli Apartheid likened to Mein Kampf, Protocols of Zion

In their book The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy, Mearsheimer and Walt repudiate the Protocols of Zion. They write:
Continue reading Jimmy Carter’s book against Israeli Apartheid likened to Mein Kampf, Protocols of Zion…

Russia bans book on Hitler saying Nazi quotes insult [unbelievable, I can find this book in almost all bookstores…I have a copy]

Russia bans book on Hitler saying Nazi quotes insult
Tue Jul 8, 2008 1:30pm EDT
By Guy Faulconbridge

MOSCOW (Reuters) - A Russian court has banned a book about Adolf Hitler by late British historian Hugh Trevor-Roper, saying quotes attributed to the Nazi leader insult Russians and Jews, prosecutors said on Tuesday.
Continue reading Russia bans book on Hitler saying Nazi quotes insult [unbelievable, I can find this book in almost all bookstores…I have a copy]…

THE OLD LIFE IS DEAD…L’ANCIENNE VIE EST MORTE…: Poems in English and in French/Poèmes en anglais et en français

“Xenia Sunic is a marvelously sensitive wordsmith and the fact that she is a multilingual poetess renders her poetic accomplishments even more impressive. One can only hope that more of her poems will follow the publication of this work.” (Dr Paul E. Gottfried).

Dr. Alexander Jacob

I’m currently reading Europa: German Conservative Foreign Policy 1870-1940, selected readings translated by Dr. Alexander Jacob. It has to be one of the most confusing, opaque, difficult books that I’ve read in a long time. I’ve read about 2/3 of it so I’ll finish the entire monograph, mostly because I just hate not finishing a book that I’ve already started. Dr. Alexander Jacob is an East Indian gentleman who’s command of the English language is rather odd for a North American ear. I find myself re-reading the same sentences and paragarphs several times and that alone drives me insane! His choice of words and idioms, sentence and paragraph structure is at times both bizarre and incomprehensible. This is what often happens when a work of German political theory (an arduous subject matter in itself) is translated by a dilettante and not a professional translator. I’m amazed that University Press of America agreed to publish this work. Has anyone over there even read him? I don’t think so as the book is full of stupid errors that an editor would’ve surely noticed.

Demolishing an Idol

Churchill: bloodthirsty warmonger, anti-German fanatic, mass murderer of the German people. May he rot in Hell forever.

Pat Buchanan’s new book, Churchill, Hitler, and the Unnecessary War: How Britain Lost Its Empire and the West Lost the World, is causing a stir, which is a good thing. Buchanan argues that both World War I and World War II were unnecessary wars; that Britain bears at least as much responsibility for both as Germany; that Winston Churchill was “the indispensable man” in reducing Britain from a world-encircling empire to “a cottage by the sea – to live out her declining years;” and that the consequence of the Western civil war that encompassed both World Wars (I would add the Cold War as well) has been the fall of the West.

Fredrick Töben reviews: James O’Brien: Hoover’s Millions and how He Made Them

Hesperian Press 2005 ISBN 085905 340 7, Victoria Park 6979, Western Australia

www.hesperianpress.com, books@hesperianpress.com

Mention the name Hoover and you may think of a vacuum cleaner or of J Edgar Hoover the homosexual head of the FBI who, among others, viciously prosecuted/persecuted homosexuals, or you may recall Herbert C Hoover who was the President of the USA.
Continue reading Fredrick Töben reviews: James O’Brien: Hoover’s Millions and how He Made Them…

Here we are: this blue-eyed professed idealist

‘Dutch Jimmy Carter’ accuses Israel of terrorism in new book.

The emotion in Andreas Van Agt’s voice as he lambastes Israel’s behavior seems puzzling for a man of his status. It is especially intriguing when one is reminded that this blue-eyed professed idealist is an astute statesman who presided as the Dutch prime minister for five years, until 1982.

Pat Buchanan on AntiwarRadio with Charles Goyette

Pat Buchanan, politician, author, syndicated columnist and broadcaster discuses his new book, Churchill, Hitler, and The Unnecessary War: How Britain Lost Its Empire and the West Lost the World, Scott McClellan’s allegations against Bush, the mistakes that Winston Churchill and other British politicians made in dealing with Hitler, Churchill’s desire for war against the Germans, the destruction of the British Empire and the creation of the Cold War, Bush’s admiration of Churchill, comparison of today’s and previous dictators to Hitler, the false comparison of today’s Iran to Hitler’s Third Reich and the reduction of the American standard of living and the U.S. dollar.

Trotskyite Morality

Warmongering Neocon Jew and anti-German fanatic, Hitchens.

Via Hannover.

Once again Buchanan states in another article below what others already know; that the Germans were not the first to attack civilian targets but merely responded after pleading for the British to cease, that the so called ‘Allies’ were the major war criminals.

But there’s more weasel writing from Buchanan, excerpts:

Late 1940 was a full year before the mass deportations from the Polish ghettos to Treblinka and Sobibor began. Churchill had ordered the indiscriminate bombing of German cities and civilians before the Nazis had begun to execute the Final Solution.

While Adolf Hitler and the Nazis were surely guilty of waging aggressive war in September 1939, Stalin and his comrades had joined the Nazis in the rape of Poland, and had raped Finland, Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia, as well. Scores of thousands of civilians in the three Baltic countries were murdered.

“Deportations”, but rightfully no mention of the absurdly alleged ‘gassings’. No mention of the fact that the alleged mass graves at these camps cannot be shown. Nothing in the way of support for the falsely alleged plan that claims the Germans wanted to externinate every Jew they could their hands on.

Notice how Buchanan gives no definition for ‘The Final Solution’*. That actual phrase is used in real German documents that state exactly what happened, deportation of Jews to the fringes of Europe.

“Aggressive war”? I suppose fighting back can be called “aggressive”.

Buchanan continues to give no definition of the ‘holocaust’. Why?

* For more on ‘The Final Solution’ canard, see:

‘Occam’s Razor / ‘Code Words’ when no evidence exists’

‘Grubach debunks Jeffrey Herf and the ‘Final Solution’ canard’

Read on.

- Hannover

Morality – Trotskyite vs. Christian

by Patrick J. Buchanan

Did Hitler’s crimes justify the Allies’ terror-bombing of Germany?

Indeed they did, answers Christopher Hitchens in his Newsweek response to my new book, “Churchill, Hitler and the Unnecessary War”: “The stark evidence of the Final Solution has ever since been enough to dispel most doubts about, say, the wisdom or morality of carpet-bombing German cities.”

Atheist, Trotskyite and newborn neocon, Hitchens embraces the morality of lex talionis: an eye for an eye. If Germans murdered women and children, the British were morally justified in killing German women and children.

According to British historians, however, Churchill ordered the initial bombing of German cities on his first day in office, the very first day of the Battle of France, on May 10, 1940.

After the fall of France, Churchill wrote Lord Beaverbrook, minister of air production: “When I look round to see how we can win the war, I see that there is only one sure path … an absolutely devastating, exterminating attack by very heavy bombers from this country upon the Nazi homeland.”

“Exterminating attack,” said Churchill. By late 1940, writes historian Paul Johnson, “British bombers were being used on a great and increasing scale to kill and frighten the German civilian population in their homes.”

“The adoption of terror bombing was a measure of Britain’s desperation,” writes Johnson. “So far as air strategy was concerned,” adds British historian A.J.P. Taylor, “the British outdid German frightfulness first in theory, later in practice, and a nation which claimed to be fighting for a moral cause gloried in the extent of its immoral acts.”

The chronology is crucial to Hitchens’ case.

Late 1940 was a full year before the mass deportations from the Polish ghettos to Treblinka and Sobibor began. Churchill had ordered the indiscriminate bombing of German cities and civilians before the Nazis had begun to execute the Final Solution.

By Hitchens’ morality and logic, Germans at Nuremberg might have asserted a right to kill women and children because that is what the British were doing to their women and children.

After the fire-bombing of Dresden in 1945, Churchill memoed his air chiefs: “It seems to me that the moment has come when the question of bombing of German cities simply for the sake of increasing the terror, though under other pretexts, should be reviewed.”

Churchill concedes here what the British had been about in Dresden.

Under Christian and just-war theory, the deliberate killing of civilians in wartime is forbidden. Nazis were hanged for such war crimes.

Did the Allies commit acts of war for which we hanged Germans?

When we recall that Josef Stalin’s judges sat beside American and British judges at Nuremberg, and one of the prosecutors there was Andrei Vishinsky, chief prosecutor in Stalin’s show trails, the answer has to be yes.

While Adolf Hitler and the Nazis were surely guilty of waging aggressive war in September 1939, Stalin and his comrades had joined the Nazis in the rape of Poland, and had raped Finland, Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia, as well. Scores of thousands of civilians in the three Baltic countries were murdered.

Yet, at Nuremberg, Soviets sat in judgment of their Nazi accomplices, and had the temerity to accuse the Nazis of the Katyn Forest massacre of the Polish officer corps that the Soviets themselves had committed.

Americans fought alongside British soldiers in a just and moral war from 1941 to 1945. But we had as allies a Bolshevik monster whose hands dripped with the blood of millions of innocents murdered in peacetime. And to have Stalin’s judges sit beside Americans at Nuremberg gave those trials an aspect of hypocrisy that can never be erased.

At Nuremberg, Adm. Erich Raeder was sentenced to prison for life for the invasion of neutral Norway. Yet Raeder’s ships arrived 24 hours before British ships and marines of an operation championed by Winston Churchill.

The British had planned to violate Norwegian neutrality first and seize Norwegian ports to deny Germany access to the Swedish iron ore being transshipped through them. For succeeding where Churchill failed, Raeder was condemned as a war criminal and sent to prison.

The London Charter of the International Military Tribunal decided that at Nuremberg only the crimes of Axis powers would be prosecuted and that among those crimes would be a newly invented “crimes against humanity.” This decree was issued Aug. 8, 1945, 48 hours after we dropped the first atom bomb on Hiroshima and 24 hours before we dropped the second on Nagasaki.

We and the British judiciously decided not to prosecute the Nazis for the bombing of London and Coventry.

It was an understandable decision, and one that surely Gen. Curtis LeMay concurred in, as LeMay had boasted at war’s end, “We scorched and boiled and baked to death more people in Tokyo that night of March 9–10 than went up in vapor in Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined.”

After the war, a lone Senate voice arose to decry what was taking place at Nuremberg as “victor’s justice.” Ten years later, a young colleague would declare the late Robert A. Taft “A Profile in Courage” for having spoken up against ex post facto justice. The young senator was John F. Kennedy.

June 25, 2008

Patrick J. Buchanan [send him mail] is co-founder and editor of The American Conservative. He is also the author of seven books, including Where the Right Went Wrong, and A Republic Not An Empire. His latest book is Churchill, Hitler, and the Unnecessary War.

Bush Behind Bars?

Thug-in-Chief.

In his new book, The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder (Vanguard Press, 2008), Vincent Bugliosi, the man who successfully prosecuted Charles Manson for murder, argues convincingly that President George W. Bush’s conduct in taking the U.S. military to war against Iraq under false pretenses in March of 2003 qualifies him to be prosecuted for murder in any state in the nation. The victims in the case would be all the soldiers from that state that were killed in the war against Iraq. He lays out his case in a devastatingly logical and methodical manner, weaving together all the relevant facts to paint the definitive portrait of just how reckless and criminal was the behavior of President Bush in his push for war against Saddam Hussein’s Iraq. Famous for his true crime books, such as the book about Charles Manson that launched his literary career, Helter Skelter, Bugliosi shows us that he is still in fine form.

Casanova: priest, con-man, cabbalist, violinist, soldier, alchemist, prisoner, fugitive, gambler, intellectual, writer and lover

What is Casanova’s biographer to do? The retired libertine did the job so well himself in his Histoire de ma vie that no one could possibly improve on his story, just as no one setting out to describe his extraordinarily restless life could have read, travelled or written more than Casanova, or thought more about the business of living than he did, or lived as bravely or as excessively.

EUGEN DÜHRING ON THE JEWS

A book to read:

This is a literal translation of the important Die Judenfrage (The Jewish Question: A Racial, Moral, and Cultural Question with a World-Historical Answer) written in 1881 by Eugen Dühring. A professor of philosophy and economics in Germany, D|hring had a major effect on other writers and on the development of racial nationalism in Europe. He was one of the first philosophers to criticize the Jews from a philosophical and racial viewpoint instead of a one based primarily on religion.

Buy it here.

Pat Buchanan: ‘after Wannsee the the trains began to roll’

The fat drunken thug who killed the British Empire and did the same to western civilization.

Via Hannover.

Patrick Buchanan, to his credit, has openly questioned the veracity of the absurdly alleged diesel gas chambers (ca. 2M Jews are said to been gassed by this laughable process).

In the article below he says, among other things, that after the Wannsee Conference of 1942, “the trains began to roll”.
excerpt:

Not until midwinter 1942 was the Wannsee Conference held, where the Final Solution was on the table.

That conference was not convened until Hitler had been halted in Russia, was at war with America and sensed doom was inevitable. Then the trains began to roll.

So what does that mean?

It’s known Jews were deported to labor camps via trains yet nowhere does Buchanan mentions the impossible and equally absurd cyanide ‘gas chambers’. Buchanan never cites the alleged mass graves, which cannot be shown to exist. Buchanan doesn’t even define what he means by ‘holocaust’. Is this fear induced weasely wordsmithing on his part?

Buchanan scores many points in this piece about the false history which states that ‘Germany wanted to ‘conquer the world’, kudos to him. But it’s the ‘holocaust’ aspect which I wish to discuss.

See false claims about the Wannsee Conference shot down here:
‘Wannsee Conference minutes debunked’

Read on, comments invited.

- Hannover

June 20, 2008
Was the Holocaust Inevitable?
by Patrick J. Buchanan
http://www.antiwar.com/pat/?articleid=13021

“What Would Winston Do?”

So asks Newsweek’s cover, which features a full-length photo of the prime minister his people voted the greatest Briton of them all.

Quite a tribute, when one realizes Churchill’s career coincides with the collapse of the British empire and the fall of his nation from world pre-eminence to third-rate power.

That the Newsweek cover was sparked by my book Churchill, Hitler and The Unnecessary War seems apparent, as one of the three essays, by Christopher Hitchens, was a scathing review. Though in places complimentary, Hitchens charmingly concludes: This book “stinks.”

Understandable. No Brit can easily concede my central thesis: The Brits kicked away their empire. Through colossal blunders, Britain twice declared war on a Germany that had not attacked her and did not want war with her, fought for 10 bloody years and lost it all.

Unable to face the truth, Hitchens seeks solace in old myths.

We had to stop Prussian militarism in 1914, says Hitchens. “The Kaiser’s policy shows that Germany was looking for a chance for war all over the globe.”

Nonsense. If the Kaiser were looking for a war he would have found it. But in 1914, he had been in power for 25 years, was deep into middle age but had never fought a war nor seen a battle.

From Waterloo to World War I, Prussia fought three wars, all in one seven-year period, 1864 to 1871. Out of these wars, she acquired two duchies, Schleswig and Holstein, and two provinces, Alsace and Lorraine. By 1914, Germany had not fought a war in two generations.

Does that sound like a nation out to conquer the world?

As for the Kaiser’s bellicose support for the Boers, his igniting the Agadir crisis in 1905, his building of a great fleet, his seeking of colonies in Africa, he was only aping the British, whose approbation and friendship he desperately sought all his life and was ever denied.

In every crisis the Kaiser blundered into, including his foolish “blank cheque” to Austria after Serb assassins murdered the heir to the Austrian throne, the Kaiser backed down or was trying to back away when war erupted.

Even Churchill, who before 1914 was charging the Kaiser with seeking “the dominion of the world,” conceded, “History should … acquit William II of having plotted and planned the World War.”

What of World War II? Surely, it was necessary to declare war to stop Adolf Hitler from conquering the world and conducting the Holocaust.

Yet consider. Before Britain declared war on him, Hitler never demanded return of any lands lost at Versailles to the West. Northern Schleswig had gone to Denmark in 1919, Eupen and Malmedy had gone to Belgium, Alsace and Lorraine to France.

Why did Hitler not demand these lands back? Because he sought an alliance, or at least friendship, with Great Britain and knew any move on France would mean war with Britain — a war he never wanted.

If Hitler were out to conquer the world, why did he not build a great fleet? Why did he not demand the French fleet when France surrendered? Germany had to give up its High Seas Fleet in 1918.

Why did he build his own Maginot Line, the Western Wall, in the Rhineland, if he meant all along to invade France?

If he wanted war with the West, why did he offer peace after Poland and offer to end the war, again, after Dunkirk?

That Hitler was a rabid anti-Semite is undeniable. Mein Kampf is saturated in anti-Semitism. The Nuremberg Laws confirm it. But for the six years before Britain declared war, there was no Holocaust, and for two years after the war began, there was no Holocaust.

Not until midwinter 1942 was the Wannsee Conference held, where the Final Solution was on the table.

That conference was not convened until Hitler had been halted in Russia, was at war with America and sensed doom was inevitable. Then the trains began to roll.

And why did Hitler invade Russia? This writer quotes Hitler 10 times as saying that only by knocking out Russia could he convince Britain it could not win and must end the war.

Hitchens mocks this view, invoking the Hitler-madman theory.

“Could we have a better definition of derangement and megalomania than the case of a dictator who overrules his own generals and invades Russia in wintertime … ?”

Christopher, Hitler invaded Russia on June 22.

The Holocaust was not a cause of the war, but a consequence of the war. No war, no Holocaust.

Britain went to war with Germany to save Poland. She did not save Poland. She did lose the empire. And Josef Stalin, whose victims outnumbered those of Hitler 1,000 to one as of September 1939, and who joined Hitler in the rape of Poland, wound up with all of Poland, and all the Christian nations from the Urals to the Elbe.

The British Empire fought, bled and died, and made Eastern and Central Europe safe for Stalinism. No wonder Winston Churchill was so melancholy in old age. No wonder Christopher rails against the book. As T.S. Eliot observed, “Mankind cannot bear much reality.”

‘Theodore Roosevelt: An American Sissy’

‘The Selected Essays of Gore Vidal’.

Richard Lynn’s The Global Bell Curve—The Explanation That Fits The Facts

Richard Lynn’s new book The Global Bell Curve: Race, IQ and Inequality Worldwide builds on Richard Herrnstein and Charles Murray’s The Bell Curve. Its subject: whether the same type of racial hierarchy in IQ and socio-economic status that Herrnstein and Murray documented in the US is present in other parts of the world. Its answer: they do.

Scott McClellan on David Letterman

Author Nicholson Baker thinks Britain should have made peace with Hitler. Jew David Aaronovitch reports

(Guess what the Jew thinks.)

Even with the usual lies contained in that book (good luck getting published a truly Revisionist work today), it’s still an important development in thinking.

IN THE Los Angeles Times a few weeks ago, the middlebrow American eclecticist and historian Mark Kurlansky told his readers that a new piece of writing “may be one of the most important books you will ever read”. The work was Human Smoke, by the novelist Nicholson Baker, a factual venture into the origins of the Second World War. Human Smoke, Kurlansky said, demonstrated “that World War II was one of the biggest, most carefully plotted lies in modern history”.

Who Killed Marilyn Monroe? Bobby Kennedy, Says New Book

I’ve always instinctively loathed all of the Kennedy brothers.

McCain and Lieberman Like this Book, So You Know it’s Evil

In this instance, you can judge a book by its cover. The back of the dust jacket displays endorsements by two of our foremost warmongers. Both John McCain and Joseph Lieberman praise Kagan as an insightful analyst of foreign policy.

The Future of Man, by Robert Klark Graham

A nice booklet on eugenics. Dowload it here:

futureofman.pdf