Pat Buchanan On Antiwar Radio Part 1 of 5

More here.

Honorable Exit From Empire

As any military historian will testify, among the most difficult of maneuvers is the strategic retreat. Napoleon’s retreat from Moscow, Lee’s retreat to Appomattox and MacArthur’s retreat from the Yalu come to mind. The British Empire abandoned India in 1947 – and a Muslim-Hindu bloodbath ensued.

Demolishing an Idol

Churchill: bloodthirsty warmonger, anti-German fanatic, mass murderer of the German people. May he rot in Hell forever.

Pat Buchanan’s new book, Churchill, Hitler, and the Unnecessary War: How Britain Lost Its Empire and the West Lost the World, is causing a stir, which is a good thing. Buchanan argues that both World War I and World War II were unnecessary wars; that Britain bears at least as much responsibility for both as Germany; that Winston Churchill was “the indispensable man” in reducing Britain from a world-encircling empire to “a cottage by the sea – to live out her declining years;” and that the consequence of the Western civil war that encompassed both World Wars (I would add the Cold War as well) has been the fall of the West.

Who’s Planning Our Next War? [Hint: The Hooked-nosed Tribe]

COMMENTARY

by PATRICK J. BUCHANAN

Of the Axis-of-Evil nations named in his State of the Union in 2002, President Bush has often said, “The United States will not permit the world’s most dangerous regimes to threaten us with the world’s most destructive weapons.”
Continue reading Who’s Planning Our Next War? [Hint: The Hooked-nosed Tribe]…

Pat Buchanan on AntiwarRadio with Charles Goyette

Pat Buchanan, politician, author, syndicated columnist and broadcaster discuses his new book, Churchill, Hitler, and The Unnecessary War: How Britain Lost Its Empire and the West Lost the World, Scott McClellan’s allegations against Bush, the mistakes that Winston Churchill and other British politicians made in dealing with Hitler, Churchill’s desire for war against the Germans, the destruction of the British Empire and the creation of the Cold War, Bush’s admiration of Churchill, comparison of today’s and previous dictators to Hitler, the false comparison of today’s Iran to Hitler’s Third Reich and the reduction of the American standard of living and the U.S. dollar.

Trotskyite Morality

Warmongering Neocon Jew and anti-German fanatic, Hitchens.

Via Hannover.

Once again Buchanan states in another article below what others already know; that the Germans were not the first to attack civilian targets but merely responded after pleading for the British to cease, that the so called ‘Allies’ were the major war criminals.

But there’s more weasel writing from Buchanan, excerpts:

Late 1940 was a full year before the mass deportations from the Polish ghettos to Treblinka and Sobibor began. Churchill had ordered the indiscriminate bombing of German cities and civilians before the Nazis had begun to execute the Final Solution.

While Adolf Hitler and the Nazis were surely guilty of waging aggressive war in September 1939, Stalin and his comrades had joined the Nazis in the rape of Poland, and had raped Finland, Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia, as well. Scores of thousands of civilians in the three Baltic countries were murdered.

“Deportations”, but rightfully no mention of the absurdly alleged ‘gassings’. No mention of the fact that the alleged mass graves at these camps cannot be shown. Nothing in the way of support for the falsely alleged plan that claims the Germans wanted to externinate every Jew they could their hands on.

Notice how Buchanan gives no definition for ‘The Final Solution’*. That actual phrase is used in real German documents that state exactly what happened, deportation of Jews to the fringes of Europe.

“Aggressive war”? I suppose fighting back can be called “aggressive”.

Buchanan continues to give no definition of the ‘holocaust’. Why?

* For more on ‘The Final Solution’ canard, see:

‘Occam’s Razor / ‘Code Words’ when no evidence exists’

‘Grubach debunks Jeffrey Herf and the ‘Final Solution’ canard’

Read on.

- Hannover

Morality – Trotskyite vs. Christian

by Patrick J. Buchanan

Did Hitler’s crimes justify the Allies’ terror-bombing of Germany?

Indeed they did, answers Christopher Hitchens in his Newsweek response to my new book, “Churchill, Hitler and the Unnecessary War”: “The stark evidence of the Final Solution has ever since been enough to dispel most doubts about, say, the wisdom or morality of carpet-bombing German cities.”

Atheist, Trotskyite and newborn neocon, Hitchens embraces the morality of lex talionis: an eye for an eye. If Germans murdered women and children, the British were morally justified in killing German women and children.

According to British historians, however, Churchill ordered the initial bombing of German cities on his first day in office, the very first day of the Battle of France, on May 10, 1940.

After the fall of France, Churchill wrote Lord Beaverbrook, minister of air production: “When I look round to see how we can win the war, I see that there is only one sure path … an absolutely devastating, exterminating attack by very heavy bombers from this country upon the Nazi homeland.”

“Exterminating attack,” said Churchill. By late 1940, writes historian Paul Johnson, “British bombers were being used on a great and increasing scale to kill and frighten the German civilian population in their homes.”

“The adoption of terror bombing was a measure of Britain’s desperation,” writes Johnson. “So far as air strategy was concerned,” adds British historian A.J.P. Taylor, “the British outdid German frightfulness first in theory, later in practice, and a nation which claimed to be fighting for a moral cause gloried in the extent of its immoral acts.”

The chronology is crucial to Hitchens’ case.

Late 1940 was a full year before the mass deportations from the Polish ghettos to Treblinka and Sobibor began. Churchill had ordered the indiscriminate bombing of German cities and civilians before the Nazis had begun to execute the Final Solution.

By Hitchens’ morality and logic, Germans at Nuremberg might have asserted a right to kill women and children because that is what the British were doing to their women and children.

After the fire-bombing of Dresden in 1945, Churchill memoed his air chiefs: “It seems to me that the moment has come when the question of bombing of German cities simply for the sake of increasing the terror, though under other pretexts, should be reviewed.”

Churchill concedes here what the British had been about in Dresden.

Under Christian and just-war theory, the deliberate killing of civilians in wartime is forbidden. Nazis were hanged for such war crimes.

Did the Allies commit acts of war for which we hanged Germans?

When we recall that Josef Stalin’s judges sat beside American and British judges at Nuremberg, and one of the prosecutors there was Andrei Vishinsky, chief prosecutor in Stalin’s show trails, the answer has to be yes.

While Adolf Hitler and the Nazis were surely guilty of waging aggressive war in September 1939, Stalin and his comrades had joined the Nazis in the rape of Poland, and had raped Finland, Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia, as well. Scores of thousands of civilians in the three Baltic countries were murdered.

Yet, at Nuremberg, Soviets sat in judgment of their Nazi accomplices, and had the temerity to accuse the Nazis of the Katyn Forest massacre of the Polish officer corps that the Soviets themselves had committed.

Americans fought alongside British soldiers in a just and moral war from 1941 to 1945. But we had as allies a Bolshevik monster whose hands dripped with the blood of millions of innocents murdered in peacetime. And to have Stalin’s judges sit beside Americans at Nuremberg gave those trials an aspect of hypocrisy that can never be erased.

At Nuremberg, Adm. Erich Raeder was sentenced to prison for life for the invasion of neutral Norway. Yet Raeder’s ships arrived 24 hours before British ships and marines of an operation championed by Winston Churchill.

The British had planned to violate Norwegian neutrality first and seize Norwegian ports to deny Germany access to the Swedish iron ore being transshipped through them. For succeeding where Churchill failed, Raeder was condemned as a war criminal and sent to prison.

The London Charter of the International Military Tribunal decided that at Nuremberg only the crimes of Axis powers would be prosecuted and that among those crimes would be a newly invented “crimes against humanity.” This decree was issued Aug. 8, 1945, 48 hours after we dropped the first atom bomb on Hiroshima and 24 hours before we dropped the second on Nagasaki.

We and the British judiciously decided not to prosecute the Nazis for the bombing of London and Coventry.

It was an understandable decision, and one that surely Gen. Curtis LeMay concurred in, as LeMay had boasted at war’s end, “We scorched and boiled and baked to death more people in Tokyo that night of March 9–10 than went up in vapor in Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined.”

After the war, a lone Senate voice arose to decry what was taking place at Nuremberg as “victor’s justice.” Ten years later, a young colleague would declare the late Robert A. Taft “A Profile in Courage” for having spoken up against ex post facto justice. The young senator was John F. Kennedy.

June 25, 2008

Patrick J. Buchanan [send him mail] is co-founder and editor of The American Conservative. He is also the author of seven books, including Where the Right Went Wrong, and A Republic Not An Empire. His latest book is Churchill, Hitler, and the Unnecessary War.

Munich, 1938 [Buchanan]

Hitler intervened to guarantee the independence of Slovakia and gave Hungary a green light to re-annex Ruthenia. Czech President Hacha then asked to see Hitler, who bullied him for three hours into signing away Czech sovereignty and making his nation the German Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia.

This is false. Hitler didn’t have to bully Hacha to “sign away” anything. This lie is repeated again and again everywhere. As David Hoggan says in his definitive work, The Forced War, Hacha’s daughter confirmed after the war that her father was treated courteously and kindly by the Germans, and with all the attention and consideration normally given to a statesman. I don’t know why Buchanan repeats this canard. He wasn’t forced to do anything. The artificial country of Czechoslovakia was coming apart because Czechs and Slovaks couldn’t get along, without the need of anyone’s push or intervention.

jew gottfried, jew liar [for those who think jew gottfried is a “good” jew]

jew gottfied writes:

I am also not convinced by Buchanan’s suggestion that since Stalin exterminated more people than Hitler that Churchill made the wrong decision, in effect, using Stalin to deal with Hitler. In terms of England’s geopolitical interests, Nazi Germany represented a much greater threat than Soviet Russia, particularly after Hitler had launched Operation Barbarossa.

At the outbreak of the war, who had Hitler “exterminated”? Even conformist historians believe that the Holocaust (whatever it was) emerged as a consequence of the war itself.

What English geopolitical interests were threatened by Germany? Adolf Hitler wanted an alliance with England and supported the British Empire. He even offered Great Britain extensive military protection as part of a peace agreement (Hitler made four peace overtures to Great Britain, they were all rebuffed). These idiots were hell-bent on destroying Germany. It’s like that story of the little boy who cut off his ears to spite his grandmother.

Jews losing their useful idiot

Is Bush Becoming Irrelevant?

On learning his trusted aide from Texas Scott McClellan has denounced as an “unnecessary war” the same Iraq war McClellan defended from the White House podium, George Bush must feel as Clinton did.

Churchill’s Colossal Blunders

Churchill: Butcher of the German People and the Man who Killed the West.

Europe, the Mother Continent of Western Man, is today aging and dying, unable to sustain the birth rates needed to keep her alive, or to resist conquest by an immigrant invasion from the Third World

What happened to the nations that only a century ago ruled the world?

Continue reading Churchill’s Colossal Blunders…

The Jews may yet get their war on Iran

Friday, April 11, 2008
ON CAPITOL HILL
Petraeus points to war with Iran
Pat Buchanan: Courtesy of Congress, Bush has a blank check to hit Tehran
By Patrick J. Buchanan
Continue reading The Jews may yet get their war on Iran…

Only the Jews won W.W. II

Thank that fat, egotistical, mass murdering drunk sociopath for your plight, White man!

“Yes, it was a good war,” writes Richard Cohen in his column challenging the thesis of pacifist Nicholson Baker in his new book, Human Smoke, that World War II produced more evil than good.

Pat Buchanan’s newest “provocation”

Via David Irving.

Pat Buchanan’s new provocation. If Britain had not guaranteed Poland in 1939, the world might have avoided a six-year war and the death of 50 million innocents - Careful Pat, those who think outside the box go straight to jail.

Buchanan unloads on nigger-animals

Nigger-animals doing what comes naturally: looting.

…

Is white America really responsible for the fact that the crime and incarceration rates for African-Americans are seven times those of white America? Is it really white America’s fault that illegitimacy in the African-American community has hit 70 percent and the black dropout rate from high schools in some cities has reached 50 percent?

Sorry, Barack, some of us have heard it all before, about 40 years and 40 trillion tax dollars ago.

The Return of Ethnic Nationalism [Buchanan]

In Africa last week, President Bush deplored the genocide in Rwanda in the 1990s, defended his refusal to send U.S. troops to Darfur and decried the ethnic slaughter in Kenya.

The Failing American Empire [The World Rejoices!]

“Things are in the saddle, and ride mankind.”

Emerson’s couplet comes to mind as the New Year opens with Pakistan, the second largest Muslim country on Earth, in social and political chaos, trending toward a failed state with nuclear weapons.

Scott Horton Interviews Pat Buchanan

Political commentator, author and Antiwar.com columnist Pat Buchanan discusses the likely consequences of the assassination of Benazir Bhutto in Pakistan, America’s unwise foreign policy toward Russia and the inevitable end of the American empire.

Buchanan’s latest book [I’ve ordered it about a week ago]

Last year, I noted that National Review had pretended not to notice Pat Buchanan’s bestselling book State of Emergency. Back then, National Review was at least pretending to support immigration restriction, so they might have been forced to say some good things about the book—which is no doubt why they ignored it.

Diversity Is Strength. It’s Also…America’s End

On the Great Seal of the United States, first suggested by the Continental Congress on July 4, 1776, there was to be emblazoned a new motto: “E Pluribus Unum”—”Out of many, one.”

Churchill, Hitler and “The Unnecessary War”: How Britain Lost Its Empire and the West Lost the World

The mass murdering sack of shit who killed the West.

Another book by Buchanan that’s about to come out (here).