Jobs are key to stable family life, say Tories

The phenomenon of the bong-smoking, shiftless, petty criminal chav lout, who goes around impregnating multiple women in every council estate in Britain, is one of the reasons why British national life has declined to the extent it has. The recent spate of knife-crime in Britain, which has attracted so much attention from the media, is caused by young men of that type.

Really, these people are copying their parents’ behaviour - because it’s more than likely that their dads behaved in exactly the same manner. So the daughters of these men will end up becoming chav Vicki Pollard mums themselves, and their sons will end up becoming chavscum males - thus passing it on, from generation to generation…

In Australia, it’s the same, if not worse. We have 770,000 people on the single parent’s pension.

The solution is not to vote Tory, but to sterilise these men while they’re teenagers - any young man wearing a baseball cap and gold chains becomes a candidate for a compulsory vasectomy. Great way of avoiding excessive population growth as well.
Continue reading Jobs are key to stable family life, say Tories…

CofCC National Conference 2008!

Listen to the speeches here.

An Interview with Ron Paul

The only genuine conservative the Jewnited States has.

“Who the heck is Ron Paul?” asked many Americans over the course of the past year. The 70 year old, Texas Congressman’s name and face adorned web pages, blogs, email spams, posters and pamphlets throughout the nation. Out of nowhere, the Republican Presidential candidate appeared on television for the Primary debates giving blunt, hard hitting, no nonsense answers and lacerating jabs. He criticized fellow candidates for their foreign policy, corporate cronyism, and support of “big” government. His candid demeanor, especially in calling out the Administration for its failure in Iraq, helped win him over many independents, jaded Republicans, and “on the fence” liberals who found his voice a refreshing and legitimate “third option.” He dominates the Internet search engines, wins most of the online polls, maintains an overwhelming presence on Youtube, and recently scored a number one bestseller with his manifesto: “Ron Paul: The Revolution.” Through independent, grass roots activism, his campaign received over $6 million dollars making it the largest one-day fundraiser in U.S. political history.

The Decline of the “Old Right” Didn’t Start With Bush

George W. Bush should be the poster boy for Hayek’s dictum of Why the Worst Get On Top; in other words, he is the worst. His statements are the worst; virtually everything that comes out of his mouth is either stupid, illiterate, ill informed, false and/or a lie (e.g.; “Major combat operations have ended,” “I’m the decider.”). His administration is the worst, responsible for putting the US in its worst condition in terms of the economy, military readiness, international standing, education, and medical care. From the 2000 election to the present, Bush and his administration have consistently and successfully worked to undermine the remains of the constitutional republic that was the United States.

Diffamation néo-antifasciste sur Cyberpresse

Une très bonne analyse de Carl Bergeron que j’ai utilisé mois-même. Rien de neuf; c’est un signe typique de la « légitimité négative » tirée de reduction ad hitlerum dont se sert la gauche bien-pensante, à savoir la gauche caviar.

Je suis quelque peu troublé, mais peu surpris je dois l’avouer, par les commentaires haineux qui depuis quelques instants défilent sur le blogue de Patrick Lagacé. Une lectrice, apparemment obsédée par mon cas, m’accuse d’être la réincarnation de la Bête immonde ; selon cette idéologue passionnée, je combinerais en effet dans ma personne la menace du nazisme allemand et celui d’Adrien Arcand. Tous les lecteurs de L’Intelligence conséquente le savent bien : les 40 000 mots de ce site argumenté et intellectuel sont tous imprégnés d’une haine nazie, c’est l’évidence. L’antisémitisme s’étale à chaque page…

Par un effet de contamination typique de la haine médiatique, les autres commentateurs renchérissent en me rattachant aux Bérêts Blancs (hein?), une frange militante de l’Église catholique que j’ignorais complètement jusqu’à ce jour.

Ce délire est d’autant plus prodigieux et révélateur qu’il ne semble pas être désapprouvé par les autorités de Cyberpresse.
Continue reading Diffamation néo-antifasciste sur Cyberpresse…

Gore Vidal on Jew-Tool Buckley

I remember reading in the early ’90s Buckley’s pathetic screed in his outfit the National Review on the alleged anti-Semitism of the Old Right; particularly, Buchanan, Sobran, etc. in which he even accused his own late father of being an anti-Semite…and I asked myself the question: what kind of a man would hurl such accusations at his own late father in order to further ingratiate himself with American Jewry? Buckley was a little despicable worm. A first-rate boot-licker and a spineless coward.

I can recall that day in the 1930s when a “news” (sic) magazine appeared in Washington, D.C.; it was called Newsweek: meant to be a counterbalance to Time Magazine’s uncontrollable malice. In due course the two became sadly alike as Vincent Astor morphed into Henry Luce: Was it something in the water? I once asked Henry Luce why he called Time a news magazine when it was simply Uncle Harry’s means of venting his rage (this was 1960 or so) at liberals, and “degenerate art” like the plays of Tennessee Williams—he had no answer. At Newsweek Vincent Astor was far too stupid to answer any such complaint. Now here we are in the Newsweek of 2008, and it’s still lousy. There have been a few decent writers in between that were less nutty than today’s Newsweek hacks.

The Neocons as a Hostile Conservative (!!) Elite [Kevin MacDonald]

I haven’t read Jacob Heilbrunn’s book on the neocons — yet, but I’m not sure I need to after seeing Philip Weiss’s review. Weiss’s review makes it clear that Heilbrunn’s book corroborates several of the themes in my writing on the neocons and on Jewish intellectual and political movements generally.

Will the Real Leo Strauss Please Stand Up?

A pretty good, honest piece. Leo Strauss was a fascist who’s only objection to National Socialism was its antagonism towards his ethnic brethren. The author omits to mention that to a large extent the founders of Italian Fascism were Jews.

Hayek: A Critique

I read this article on Hayek a few months ago in its French original and it’s the best critical analysis of laissez faire, free market capitalism and its principle European guru, Friedrich von Hayek, that I’ve ever read. Unrestrained, savage capitalism is ultimately destructive of all that traditionalists and conservatives pretend to cherish and value, so it’s ironic to usually see them championing what they should normally oppose with with all the strength at their disposal. Alain de Benoist’s piece is quite lengthy so you might want to print it out. Enjoy!

The “Club de l’Horloge” held its 5th annual meeting October 20-22 1989 in Nice, on “Liberalism at the People’s Service.” The general tone was “national liberal” conservative. According to the Club’s president, Henry de Lesquen, “there can be no authentic liberal society as long as the concept of man emerging from the Western, humanist and Christian tradition has not prevailed.”[1] The objective was to contrapose two liberal traditions: Locke’s vs. Hume’s and Burke’s, i.e., a “bad liberalism” leading to libertarian or anarcho-capitalist movements, and a “good liberalism” concerned with preserving tradition and thus reconcilable with a “nationalist” perspective. This politically opportunistic approach legitimates itself by appealing to a long gone author: Friedrich A. (von) Hayek. While the distinction[2] has recently been somewhat mitigated, “national liberalism” (or conservative liberalism) constantly reappears in the history of ideas.[3] A good way to approach this problem is to begin with Hayek’s works.

Doomed to Failure: American Conservatism

Paul Gottfried’s excellent book lends strong support to a controversial claim of Murray Rothbard’s. In his The Betrayal of the American Right (Mises Institute, 2007), Rothbard argues that the American Old Right could not be considered conservative in the European sense. Quite the contrary, it opposed traditional conservatism as an enemy of liberty. Rothbard states his view with characteristic force. He refers to “the philosophy that has marked genuinely conservative thought, regardless of label, since the ancient days of Oriental despotism: an all-encompassing reverence for ‘Throne-and-Altar,’ for whatever divinely sanctioned State apparatus happened to be in existence.” (Betrayal, p. 1). The Old Right of Nock, Flynn, Garrett, and others, was a classical liberal movement, not a conservative one.

Malaise on the Right

by Patrick J. Buchanan
The New York Times report that social conservatives are talking of bolting to a third-party candidate, should Rudy Giuliani get the GOP nomination, is another sign of the disintegrating Reagan coalition.

Race consciousness for nonwhites and race blindness for whites

Alex writes:

Further to your observation that the Science Museum in London shows its typical visitors as being all nonwhite, even though only 10 percent of the population of Britain is nonwhite, the effort to represent Britain as a “vibrant and growing multi-cultural community” goes way beyond the racial headcounting which takes place at stately homes and cultural organizations. Even utility bills are accompanied by publicity material in which the “typical” customer is a black or Asian family.

LA replies:

And try to imagine your typical conservative/ neoconservative criticizing something like that. In order to see the badness and offensiveness of falsely portraying a historically 100 percent and currently 90 percent white country as nonwhite, a person would have to have some racial consciousness of himself and his country as white.

The left is race conscious and is pushing nonwhiteness. But the conservatives, upholding race blindness as their highest ideal, are incapable of opposing the left’s race-conscious promotion of nonwhiteness. A conservatism devoid of race consciousness cannot be a serious conservatism.

Posted by Lawrence Auster at 10:41 AM
http://www.amnation .com/vfr/

PUBLISHING PRESIDENT: ‘Liberals read more books than conservatives’

No surprise here, American “conservatives” are the dumbest people around. For an example of a flag-waving, one-lobed imbecile, see here.

WASHINGTON (AP) - Liberals read more books than conservatives. The head of the book publishing industry’s trade group says she knows why—and there’s little flattering about conservative readers in her explanation.

George Will is still irrelevant

In recent weeks Will has all but endorsed Rudy Giuliani (whom else?) for president and ridiculed Ron Paul, who takes the U.S. Constitution seriously, as an anachronism. I imagine he slapped his flippers together in glee when Giuliani attacked Paul for saying the obvious, that the 9/11 attacks were motivated by American foreign policy, rather than by virginal American innocence. Paul might have been speaking for Jefferson, Madison, and Hamilton, men to whom Giuliani would have little to say, unless he could say it with his middle finger.

Conservative = someonoe with the I.Q. of an amoeba

You don’t have to be a total idiot to be a Republican, but it helps.

When Joe Farah says he’s been studying the Middle East for thirty years, what he really means is that he’s been reading lunatic Christian Zionist fantasies like Hal Lindsey’s “Late Great Planet Earth” since that particular cult began to proliferate in the 1970s.

Why Ron Paul is disqualified.

Left and Right: Peas in a Pod

by Thomas E. Woods, Jr.

Whatever other problems mainstream conservatives have these days, the most pronounced is what we might call their readiness to hysteria.
Continue reading Left and Right: Peas in a Pod…

Derbyshire On The Senile Decay Of National Review [you want to know why every White man should despise conservatives? Read on.]

By Patrick Cleburne

I remarked some time ago that Kevin MacDonald’s work is amongst the most important material we publish on VDARE.com. It certainly has got us in the most trouble.
Continue reading Derbyshire On The Senile Decay Of National Review [you want to know why every White man should despise conservatives? Read on.]…

The Iraq Calamity: What will be the US response?

Catastrophe Still Awaits
by Paul Craig Roberts

“The real difficulty in changing any enterprise lies not in developing new ideas, but in escaping from the old ones.”

~ John Maynard Keynes

A ray of realism appeared in the confirmation hearings for Secretary of Defense nominee Robert Gates before the Senate Armed Services Committee. Gates himself said that the US was not winning in Iraq, a statement with which everyone agreed except the White House.

Continue reading The Iraq Calamity: What will be the US response?…

The Wacky Neo-Cons: And why they are going the way of the Bolsheviks

Bush Is No Conservative
by Paul Craig Roberts

The conservative movement in the United States has been stamped out, not by liberals but by neoconservatives. Conservative philanthropic foundations, conservative print media, and conservative think tanks have been taken over by neoconservatives, who have exiled real conservatives to voicelessness and joblessness.

Continue reading The Wacky Neo-Cons: And why they are going the way of the Bolsheviks…

Moeller van den Bruck

A couple of weeks ago I finished an excellent book of political philosophy written by the German author Moeller van den Bruck and entitled Germany’s Third Empire and published in 1922. I’ve also read some reviews of his work where he’s described as a “National Bolshevik” which is patently absurd. As a matter of fact, I don’t remember reading a philosophical work that was more National Socialist in tone and spirit than Germany’s Third Empire, including Mein Kampf. Moreover, this was apparently the feeling of Adolf Hitler as well, since upon meeting Moeller van den Bruck he told him that Germany’s Third Empire was a National Socialist work; and Hitler had a signed copy in his bunker where he committed suicide. His politics were those of a German revolutionary conservative…incidentally, the German historian Ernst Nolte in his trilogy on the history of fascism describes National Socialism as revolutionary conservatism.

Here’s a flavour of his style from Germany’s Third Empire:

[Marx] was a Jew, a stranger in Europe who nevertheless dared to meddle in the affairs of European peoples. He was not intimately in touch with their history; their past was not his past, and the traditions which had determined their present, were not his. He had not lived through the centuries with them, his feeling were different, his thoughts were different. Marx is only comprehensible through his Jewish origins. It is no accident that he displays Mosaic, Maccabean traits, traits of the Talmud – and the Ghetto…In all his writing there is not a one word of love for men. Against a background of sinister passion there flame through his words the fires of hate, retaliation and revenge…Marx’s message was international, therefore it was able to mislead Europe and set Europe by the ears. He addressed his message to the proletariat because he thought that amongst them national distinctions were non-existent. Jew that he was, national feeling was incomprehensible to him; rationalist that he was, national feeling was for him out of date. He ignored the upper strata of Europe because he did not belong to them and had no clue to the values that they had created through the centuries and had handed on as a precious heritage to their children, a heritage in which he and his forefathers had no share. He felt his affinity with the proletariat. He bade them to abjure any national feeling they had had and learn to feel themselves a class apart. It did not occur to him that perhaps national socialism might be a condition precedent of universal socialism; that men can only live if their nations live also.