B. Gollnisch saisit le Parlement européen sur les lois liberticides

Le 18 juin dernier M. Bruno Gollnisch, député européen que nos correspondants connaissent bien, avait, à la suite du refus d’honorariat signifié à Maître Eric Delcroix (voy. n/messages des 21/3, 21/4 et 5/7/08), déposé une “Déclaration écrite” au Parlement européen pour dénoncer l’intolérable police de la pensée. Voici cette déclaration écrite dans sa forme officielle (250 mots maximum).
Continue reading B. Gollnisch saisit le Parlement européen sur les lois liberticides…

Antikriegstag Dortmund 2008

06.09.2008 - Hinaus zum Antikriegstag 2008 nach Dortmund, gegen imperialistische Kriegstreiberei und Aggressionskriege!

Plan to give Europe to Germany revealed in secret files

August 31, 2008

A BRITISH amateur diplomat tried to stop World War II by offering Nazi Germany rule over Europe if the British Empire could rule the rest of the world, according to secret files declassified today.
Continue reading Plan to give Europe to Germany revealed in secret files…

The Vandals Sack Rome: The Lost Gold of Rome by Daniel Costa

ISBN 9780750943970; 2007

During the second month of Maximus’ rule at Rome, news reached the
city that the mighty fleet of Gaiseric, had appeared at the mouth of
the Tiber. The hordes of Gaiseric stole methodically anything of
value they could find. Every region of Rome was plundered
simultaneously.

The Vandals left Rome after fourteen interminable days, taking with
them the Empress Eudoxia, her daughter Eudocia, and Gaudentius, one
of the sons of Aetius. Moreover, they took into captivity thousands
of Romans: it has been suggested that Rome lost nearly 200,000 of her
citizens during the two weeks of the sack. Exactly as the Visigoths
had behaved forty-five years earlier, they forced no changes in the
government and did not initiate a military occupation. But they left
behind a profoundly humiliated and impoverished city with ugly scars
caused by their rapacity and dead bodies decomposing in the streets.

In Africa, Rome’s granary, the Vandals had taken over the lands of
the Roman nobility and the Roman Church. Most of the senatorial
families were now destitute, and famous ancient families vanished.

Rome and the End of the Empire in the West

The antagonistic presence of the Vandals in Africa, their control
over the grain supply to Rome and Italy, and the vigorous raids of
their navy seriously enfeebled the Roman strength in the Western
provinces. Moreover, during the four decades that followed the rapid
disintegration of the Hunnic Empire in 454, the Germanic barbarians
gradually expanded their territories in Gaul and Spain. And with the
assassination of Aetius by Valentinian III in 455 the Roman power in
the West had received a last, violent body-blow.

The continuing crisis in the Western Empire, fueled by unremitting
barbarian incursions, the haemorrhaging of her once great wealth
through raids and to the Church, and the growing power of Christian
leaders, finally drove the empire over the edge. Its demise paved the
way for the complete triumph of the barbarians and the onset of the
Middle Ages.

Rome under the Ostrogoths: The Lost Gold of Rome by Daniel Costa

ISBN 9780750943970; 2007

After the German defeat of the Huns in 454, the Ostrogoths took over
Pannonia, migrating into the Balkans in 473. To rid himself of the
troublesome Balkan Ostrogoths of Theodoric, who in 487 had marched to
the walls of Constantinople, the eastern Emperor Zeno supported the
idea of their departure for Italy in 488. The Ostrogoths were to
snatch it from Odoacer and rule it under eastern imperial control.
Zeno was clearly not in a position to reconquer Italy himself. As for
the Ostrogoths, they lacked provisions and had been longing for many
years to settle.

In 488, approximately forty thousand Ostrogoths began advancing
towards Italy along the old Roman roads, accompanied by their wagons.
Food was scarce. After marching past cities with locked gates and
defeating the fierce Gepids, another Germanic tribe, Theodoric
finally led his famished people into Italy. It took Theodoric three
and a half years and several vicious battles in Italy to win the war
with Odoacer. On 25 February 493, Theodoric concluded a treaty with
Odoacer whereby they were to rule Italy as coregents. Only ten days
afterwards, Theodoric ended the life of Odoacer with his own hands
during a shared meal in Ravenna on 5 March 493.

Guessedworker: Anti-German Nutbar, English Chauvinist

My conversation with an anti-German continues.

Chamberlain published Die Grundlagen des Neunzehnten Jahrhunderts in 1899. My remarks in respect to the general derision which greeted the ideas of palingenic Nazism, especially the Master Race (and in practise it was German, not Nordic), are confined to the years of National Socialist power: 1933 to 1945. The general population had no opinion on Chamberlain whatever. The man had been dead for three decades.

I thought that you were talking about Germans (or simply “Krauts,” as you prefer to call them), no matter the time frame.

In any case, an empirically false and religious idea is not more respectable for being advocated in the 19th century rather than the 20th.

It was a respectable idea held by many Western intellectuals and, in light of numerous German scientific and cultural achievements, empirically sound.

Nineteenth century German prestige

This dark image of a sinister, aggressive, predatory, and militarily regimented Germany only became prevalent in the present century. The English historian, Frederic William Maitland, has described the once characteristic attitude toward the Germans:

… it was usual and plausible to paint the German as an unpractical, dreamy, sentimental being, looking out with mild blue eyes into a cloud of music and metaphysics and tobacco smoke.1

The French writer, Madame de Stael, romantically portrayed for the Napoleonic world of the early nineteenth century a Germany utterly unlike the grotesque image later drawn by the Allied propagandists of two World Wars. Madame de Stael’s Germans were a nation of “Poets and Thinkers,” a race of kindly, impractical, other-worldly dreamers without national prejudices and, strangely, in the light of later propaganda, “disinclined to war.”2

In America too, a similarly warm view of things German predominated. It is difficult to exaggerate the constructive impact of German institutions upon American life and the cordiality of the reception accorded them in the century or so from Frederick the Great to Bismarck. The story of this golden age of German-American relations has been magnificently chronicled by a very thorough and gifted American scholar, Henry M. Adams, in his recently published Prussian-American Relations, 1775-1871.3 In the cultural and intellectual spheres as in the political sphere the relationship was one of immense mutual profit.

The Prussian system of higher education and the cultural flowering which characterized Prussia in the era of regeneration following the Napoleonic wars all left a distinct mark upon America. The list of American scholars and writers — George Tichnor, Edward Everett, Joseph Cogswell, George Bancroft, John Lothrop Motley, Henry E. Dwight, Washington Irving, Henry W. Longfellow, and James F. Cooper, to mention only some — who went to Prussia to secure inspiration for their life’s work is a most impressive one. Thus, to Americans too, “whether seen in their newly united nation or in this country, the Germans were generally regarded as methodical and energetic people” indeed as “models of progress,” while “in their devotion to music, education, science, and technology they aroused the admiration and emulation of Americans.”4

It is evident then that Germans in the nineteenth century ranked quite high in the esteem of their European and American neighbors. Two unrelated historic factors seemed to conspire at the time to give widespread currency to views of this sort.

First, there were the truly monumental achievements of Germans in every sphere of cultural, intellectual, and scientific creativity. It could hardly have seemed amiss to speak of a nation of Dichter und Denker when one thought of the contributions to literature of Goethe and Schiller, the historical works of Ranke and Niebuhr, the philosophical studies of Kant and Hegel, the great scientific achievements of Alexander von Humboldt and Röntgen, and the varied musical achievements of Beethoven, the Strausses, and Wagner.

The second factor which seemed to support this attitude toward the Germans was their military and political weakness before their achievement of national unification in 1871.

One cannot imagine a more vivid contrast than that between de Stael’s Germans and the stereotyped image of monocled, burr-headed, heel-clicking, mindless robots which Hollywood did so much to popularize in the thirties and forties.

Possibly even more difficult to grasp, for those whose thinking has been shaped by the propaganda of recent years, is the fact that throughout the nineteenth century France rather than Germany was cast in the role of international bully and villain.5 Had not Louis XIV and Bonaparte repeatedly made a battleground of Europe? Could anyone forget that French arms had rolled at high tide across the entire continent of Europe, threatening to engulf even the vast empire of the Russian Tsars? Or could anyone forget that it had required the combined resources of Austria, Britain, Russia, and Prussia, assisted by the fortuitous intervention of nature in the form of the Russian winter, to shatter the might of the Corsican conqueror?

Source.

As for this “hatred of Germans” of mine, well … there is something very Jewish in the way you launch a wild and innacurate attack on the morality of a critic. You must know you are not addressing the substantive issue but, instead, calling me your version of “anti-semitic”.

You consistently take an anti-German stand in your posts. Although I have yet to see you use such ethnic slurs as “Nigger” or “Kike”, etc. “Kraut” seems to roll off your tongue regularly and with great ease.

I do not believe you will be able to contribute intellectually or ideologically to a Restoration in any way until you can set aside this driven need you have to snatch a National Socialist victory out of the embers of the 1945 defeat. It is too all-embracing for you and far too irrational. It is in your way, and I don’t like it getting in ours.

I’m exposing the various hoaxes that pass for Third Reich (and W.W. II) scholarship in the West and that you frequently peddle on your little blog. In its anti-German rhetoric, MajorityRights is indistinguishable from Free Republic or Little Green Footballs. Whether you’re conscious of it or not, you’re hawking a Jew-financed worldview.

So you have not heard of The Drive to the East and the Generalplan Ost which sprang from it, and which required 50% of Czechs, for example, 25% of Ukrainians and 25% of Belarusians to be “cleansed”? You know nothing about the regimes which were established in the Baltic States, Eastern Poland and the Ukraine to commence this work? What do you think would have happened there if the Red Army had been defeated, and the Germans had been free to do as they pleased? Do you really believe that Hitler did not intend the Aryan masters to settle the land and rule over the remaining Untermenschen?

Anonymous authority. The above paragraph is fictitious in nature, complete with bogus percentages.

However, we know what actually did take place:

I found this new release in the bookstore today. It’s the first English language source that I have seen since James Bacque’s Other Losses about the postwar Allied occupation of Germany. MacDonogh also reaches the conclusion that millions of German civilians died between the time of V-E Day and the Berlin Airlift.

Friends of mine, even published historians, have often told me that the Germans ‘deserved what they got’ in 1945: it was a just punishment for their behaviour in occupied lands and for the treatment of the Jews at home. This book is not intended to excuse the Germans, but it does not hesitate to expose the victorious Allies in their treatment of the enemy at the peace, for in most cases it was not the criminals who were raped, starved, tortured or bludgeoned to death but women, children, and old men. What I record and sometimes call into question here is the way that many people were allowed to exact that revenge by military commanders, even by government ministers; and that when they did so they often killed the innocent, not the guilty.

MacDonogh, xiii

I’m on page 55 of 618 right now. I want to gag. He obviously wasn’t joking about exposing the brutality of the Allied occupation. Here are a few selections:

In Danzig it was open season for the Russian soldiers once again. They raped, murdered and pillaged. Women between the ages of twelve and seventy-five were raped; boys who sought to rescue their mothers were pitilessly shot. The Russians defiled the ancient Cathedral of Oliva and raped the Sisters of Mercy. Later they put the building to the torch. In the same hospitals both nurses and female doctors were subjected to the same outraged after the soldiers drank surgical spirit. Nurses were raped over the bodies of unconscious patients in the operating theatres together with the women in the maternity ward. Doctors who tried to stop this were simply gunned down. The Poles behaved as badly as the Russians. Many Danzigers took their own lives. The men were rounded up, beaten and thrown into the concentration camp at Matzkau. From there 800 to 1,000 were dispatched to Russia twice daily.

Ibid., 55

Ships fared no better. They were sunk as they left the harbour of Pillau outside Konigsberg. Hundreds of thousands of refugees trekked across the ice that covered the inland seas of the Frisches and Kurisches Haff in heavy laden carts and proceeded toward Danzig. The Russians warned them that they would fire at the ice from their warships on 15 February. The shells ht men and horses. Where the ice was smashed, the trekkers put temporary bridges and persevered. The night was pitch black. All they cold hear war ‘Shooting, screaming and screeching’. When dawn broke they realized the full horror: body upon body, man and horse; and every now and then the chassis of a cart sticking out of the thin ice. Those who succeeded in making it to the thin strip of land that borders Haff and Nehrung had a choice of heading north to the ships at Pillau or south-west towards Danzig.

Ibid., 47

For the Russians, Berlin - even in its ruinous state - was the picture of sophistication. They thought that the light was captured in lightbulbs and unscrewed them to send them home. They were fascinated by lavatories with flushes - and allegedly used them to wash their potatoes in. Little things, like cigarette lighters, were not only new, but utterly enchanting to them. . . .

The Woman saw her liberators discard a collection of classical 78s, including Lohengrin and Beethoven’s Ninth, in favour of a record playing an advertising jingle from C&A in the Spittalmarkt. . . .

The Russian inability to master anything technical was ‘an inexhaustible chapter’. They stole all the bicycles they could find. The Woman saw them take them up to a street near the Hasenheide where they practised riding them. They sat ’stiff on the saddles like chimpanzees in the zoo’. They frequently fell off before they mastered the use of the two-wheeled beast.

Ibid, 97

Rape was most common amongst the Russians and French, less so amongst the Americans and British, in that order. I spent last night reading about the unbelievable savagery of the Czechs.

The resistance had been wiped out as early as the autumn of 1941, and was unable to re-form until 1943 and 1944, when there was an uprising in Slovakia. Nazi brutality was measured: apart from the massacre at Lidice - provoked by the British-masterminded assassination of the deputy protector Reinhard Heydrich - there were no startling atrocities. The country was hardly touched by the aerial bombardment that struck terror into the rest of Europe. The French bore far worse, and behaved better towards the defeated Germans; but then again, the French were not considered to be racially inferior. . . .

The insurgents captured the radio station and began broadcasting the slogan ‘Smrt Nemcum! Smrt vsem Nemcum! Smrt vsem Okkupanten!’ (Death to the Germans! Death to all Germans! Death to all occupiers!). There was to be no mercy for old men, women or children - even for German dogs. Margarete Schell’s was stoned by Czech children and had to be shot. It was the first day of the Revolution …

Women too were forced to were forced to clear the barricades. Helene Bugner was first beaten by the porter of her block of flats, then a Professor Zelenka drove her and twenty other women off to clear the streets. ‘Here, I have brought you some German sows!’ said the professor. Both men and women died from the beatings. A large crowd of Czechs stood by and cheered whenever a woman was struck or fell. At the end of their work they had to tread on a larger picture of Hitler and spit on it. Margarete Schell saw people being forced to eat pieces of such pictures as she too was put to work on the barricades. As they were driven off, one woman heard a Czech tell another, ‘Don’t hit them on the head, they might die at once. THey must suffer longer and a lot more.’ When Helene Bugner returning that evening she was unrecognizable to her children.

Marianne Klaus saw her husband alive for the last time on the 9th. She received his body the next day - the sixty-six-year-old had been beaten to death by the police. On the same day she saw two SS men suffer a similar fate, kicked in the stomach until blood spurted out; a woman Wehrmacht auxillary stoned and hanged; and another SS man hung up by his feet from a lamppost and set alight. Many witnesses attested to the stringing up and burning of Germans as ‘living torches’, not just soldiers but also young boys and girls. Most were SS men, but as the Czechs were not always too scrupulous about looking at the uniforms, a number of Wehrmacht soldiers perished in this way too. …

The Ministry of Education, the Military Prison, the Riding School, the Sports Stadium and the Labor Exchange were set aside for German prisoners. The Scharnhorst School was the scene of a massacre on the night of the 5th. Groups of ten Germans were led down to the courtyard and shot: men, women and children - even babies. THe others had to strip the corpses and bury them. Alfred Gabauer saw female SS employees forced to roll naked in a pool of water before they were beaten senseless with rifle butts. There were as many as 10,000-15,000 Germans in the football stadium in Strahov. Here the Czechs organized a game where 5,000 prisoners had to run for their lives as guards fired on them with machine guns. Some where shot in the latrines. The bodies were not cleared away and those who had used the latrines later had to defecate on their dead countrymen. As a rule all SS men were killed, generally by a shot in the back of the heard or the stomach. Even after 16 May when order was meant to be restored, twelve to twenty people died daily and were taken away from the stadium on a dung wagon. Most had been tortured first. Many were buried in mass graves at Pankrac Prison where a detachment of sixty prisoners was on hand to inter the corpses. Another impromptu prison was in a hotel up in the hills. This had been the Wehrmacht’s brothel. A number of Germans were locked up in the cellar, and the whores and their pimps indulged in a new orgy of sadism and perversity. German men and women had to strip naked for their treatment. One of them was Professor Walter Dick, heard of a department at the Bulovka Hospital. He was driven insane by his torturers and hanged himself on a chain.

Ibid, 125-134

It goes on like this for thirty more pages and becomes even more graphic. I haven’t gotten to the part about the POW camps or the expulsions from Poland yet.

National Socialist Germany was not our spiritual friend or political teacher, and it had to be defeated.

Happily, Guessedworker’s views are in the minority among conservative British and American authors (i.e., purportedly his ideological camp). The prevailing sentiments of that cadre correspond to those of Professor John Charmley:

Charmley’s scholarship…finds Churchill’s early years powerful and compelling, but believes that Churchill’s alternative to appeasement was unrealistic and his actions as Prime Minister in World War II were a failure. The resulting collapse of the British Empire and the rise of the United States and the Soviet Union Charmley sees as disastrous in all three areas. While Charmley never states outright that as Prime Minister Churchill should have allied with Nazi Germany in 1940, he believes it to have been possible to do so honourably and that it would have safeguarded the British Empire better than an alliance with the anti-colonial U.S. President Roosevelt. Charmley does outright recommend “disengaging” from the war against Germany, and letting Stalin and Hitler whittle away each other’s power rather than risk Britain’s resources.

Britain and France went to war with Germany because they had no political options remaining. Hitler was implacable in his will to Drive to the East, and the old powers were bound to try to prevent Germany from developing into a powerhouse fueled by land-theft and slavery.

This is false. Britain and France didn’t declare war on Germany because of “land-theft and slavery” or because of a fictitious “Ostplan.”

[T]he British Government agreed: Danzig should be returned. For of all the amputations of German lands and peoples at Versailles, European statesmen, even Winston Churchill, regarded Danzig and the Polish Corridor that sliced Germany in two as the most outrageous. The problem was the Poles, who refused to discuss Danzig.

Then, in March, Czechoslovakia suddenly began to fall apart. The Sudetenland had been annexed by Germany. Hungary had taken back its lost lands, and Poland had annexed the disputed region of Teschen. Slovakia and Ruthenia now moved to declare independence, and Prague began to march on the provinces.

Hitler intervened to guarantee the independence of Slovakia and gave Hungary a green light to re-annex Ruthenia. Czech President Hacha then asked to see Hitler, who bullied him for three hours into signing away Czech sovereignty and making his nation the German Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia. [This is false, David Hoggan quotes Hacha’s daughter after the war to the effect that her father was very well treated and with consideration by German authorities and that no undue pressure was put on him at any time.]

Chamberlain, now humiliated, mocked by Tory back-benchers, panicking over wild false rumors of German attacks on Romania and Poland, made the greatest blunder in British history. Unasked, he issued a war guarantee to Poland, empowering a Polish dictatorship of colonels that had joined Hitler in dismembering Czechoslovakia to drag the British Empire into war with Germany over a city, Danzig, the British thought should be returned to Germany.

It was not Munich. It was the war guarantee that guaranteed the war that brought down the Empire, and gave us the Holocaust, 50 million dead and the Stalinization of half of Europe.

Source.

There is no parallel with the deeds of the Wehrmacht in the East,

What are the chances that Guessedworker has bothered to read the following works?:

Joachim Hoffmann, Stalin’s War of Extermination 1941-1945. Planning, Realization, Documentation.

Franz W. Seidler, Crimes Against the Wehrmacht (2. vols.)

Walter Post, The Defamed Wehrmacht.

Nil. Of course.

The British Empire was not run along the brutal lines of, say, the Germans in East Africa or the French in the North and the Belgians in the East. On a day-to-day basis the Raj scarcely involved the British, who found it eminently more agreeable to support princes, where possible, than to fight them.

“It says so in this book I’ve read written by an apologist of the British Empire!” Guessedworker engages in deception and self-deception. Who out of those people that the British Empire exploited, raped, and murdered for decades and centuries would want the British yoke back? I don’t hear the natives clamouring for a return of glorious Raj, do you?

The historic benevolence and magnanimity of the British in exotic and far away places is well known to the world. Caveat: we’re talking about White people here, not wogs:

The British Army created the concentration camps as part of a campaign against Boer guerrillas fighting against the takeover of their independent republic. Civilians were herded into the camps from their farms, but the insanitary conditions cost many their lives as hunger and disease ran rampant. Between June 1901 and May 1902, of the 115,000 people in the camps, almost 28,000 died, about 22,000 of them children. The death toll represented about 10 per cent of the Boer population. About 20,000 black people also died in other camps.

Source.

Guessedworker: Anti-German Kook

More on the neurotic.

The notion that Krauts were the masters of the world was a bad joke, rendered hilarious by all the goose-stepping and uniforms.

Guessedworker’s compatriot, Houston Stewart Chamberlain, and the Frenchman Arthur de Gobineau, didn’t think that the “notion of Krauts were the master of the world was a bad joke…” Unlike Guessedworker, both pre-eminent racialists of the 19th Century were Germanophiles, or, as they’ve been called: “Prophets of Teutonism.” So, contrary to Guessedworker, the thought was never a “bad joke.” On the contray, Germanism was rather the norm in many intellectual circles. Again, Guessedworker is ahistorically projecting his own anti-German feelings. The fact that it’s a joke to him doesn’t mean that strong pro-German sentiments didn’t exist among most racialist, anti-liberal European doctrinaires, authors, and thinkers of the 19th century and early 20th century..

A great deal of Brits, Frenchmen, Americans, etc. (i.e., and not only Guessedworker’s stupid bogeyman, “German-Americans”) of Guessedworker’s age or generation have come to appreciate the nature of the W.W. II and the forces behind it. Guessedworker hasn’t reached that point yet. Which, in my opinion, makes him psychologically immature (”my daddy hated them Krauts and so will I!”), and ultimately harmful to our interests as White men and women. That’s another reason why I find MR of very limited use and frequent its pages less and less. I will probably abstain altogether soon. Even a paleocon Catholic like Buchanan is better on W.W. II and the surrounding questions than Guessedworker, what does that tell you?

I think that some texts that can help to explain Guessedworker’s frequent cavalcade of insults (”Krauts”) hatred and disparagment of Germans (he really can’t help himself! His outbursts are increasing in frequency, another curioso) can be found here:

Dr. Michael F. Connors

Dealing in Hate: The development of anti-German propaganda

GRENFELL, Captain Russel, R.N.

Unconditional Hatred, German War Guilt and the Future of Europe

“Mr. Churchill was not a statesman seeking always his own country’s advantage amid the twists and turns of a dangerous world. He was an international crusader preaching and conducting a holy war for the destruction of the Hitler regime and the German military power at any cost; at any cost to his own country and the rest of the world. In his own words, there was no sacrifice he would not make to get rid of Hitler, although up to the British declaration of war against Germany in 1939 Hitler had done no harm to Britain and had actually gone out of his way to placate her at some sacrifice to German pride by agreeing to keep the German fleet at a third of the strength of the British. Mr. Churchill’s war policy was not national but religious.”

John Ramsden’s Don’t Mention the War is also useful to understand the development of anti-German hate in Great Britain:

By Prof. Emil Schlee

WW II: Whose War was it?

By Steffen Werner

Hundred Years of War against Germany

Double-Standards and Hypocrisy: the British Approach to Germany [further exchange with an anti-German fanatic]

MajorityRights.

Do you really think that the Master Race was not an outrageous idea in the 1930s, repugnant to the entire world?

Adolf Hitler’s views on race weren’t particularly “outrageous” or spectacular. And didn’t differ from those held by English eugenicists during that same period.

Or the slave-labour that flowed from it?

Nothing comparable to the British famine policy in India ever occurred during the time of the Third Reich.

As B.M. Bhatia writes in his 1967 book, Famines in India: From about the beginning of the eleventh century to the end of the eighteenth there were 14 major famines in India.” This is roughly two per century. Under the period of East India Company rule from 1765-1858 there occurred 16 major famines, a rate eight times higher than what had been common before. Then, under the period of British Colonial Office rule from 1859 to 1914, there was a major famine in India an average of every two years, or 25 times the historical rate before British rule! The rest of the world’s population was growing due to technological progress, but the population of India remained at approximately 220 million for over a century prior to 1914.

Deliberately inducing a major famine more or less every two years, was, for over half a century, the backbone of British colonial policy in India.

Or the militarisation of society?

How Germans decide to order their society shouldn’t be any of your business.

Or the violent appropriation of other peoples’ homelands?

A Brit would know a thing or two about “the violent appropriaton of other peoples’ homelands.”

Did the world want to see Germany made “great and powerful” by such means? Or do you think it might eventually be forced to resist?

The “world”? You mean Britain, of course.

Guessedworker: Anti-German Liar

Guessedworker’s Hero and Fellow Anti-German Fanatic.

Every time I forget just why I dislike MajorityRights so much, a quick visit reminds me.

MajorityRights.com

It is an astonishingly extreme list, not just by our inevitably liberalistic standards today but by the standards of the inter-war era too. I have made the point once or twice with enthusiasts of this stuff that, actually, they could not have survived this ideological straitjacket, and would most likely have been the first to be lined up against the wall.

Erm…no. You should stick to English politics and history, GW. You don’t know ANYTHING about National Socialism or the Third Reich. You’re reflexively hostile to all things German, a character trait you share with your fellow insulars, of course. At least you could do your readers a favour and stop commenting on things you don’t understand and instinctively hate anyways. I’m reminded of Ian Kershaw who in the introduction to his biography of Hitler states that he “abhors” everything about the man. How do you like that? Do you expect anything but lies and hate from such an impartial historical observer? Further in his introduction, Kershaw (who got an knighthood from the Old Dear for his efforts) writes that Hitler had no other interests beyond politics. Oh? Really? How about art and architecture? Classical music and opera? Animal welfare? Etc., etc., etc. This is the type of garbage GW reads and accepts as Gospel. You never hear an alternative interpretation. Irving couldn’t even get Goebbels published, although the work is hardly pro-Nazi. The Allies have been dissembling for 60 years now and it’s not about to stop.

Although you don’t like to hear it, the Third Reich was a fantastic time. It was a time when Germany was happy, healthy, prosperous, clean, homogeneous, orderly, beautiful, and a powerhouse. A time when Germany’s government had real Germans at its helm who had Germany’s best interests at heart. Simply by far the best years in German history! A magical time for Germans.

As someone commented on my blog:

Yes, indeed. My mother, who was a young girl at the time, often pities us (her children), that we did not and probably never will experience anything like it. She says it is nowadays just inconceivable and for us unimaginable. She is naturally not talking about material wealth (even so everyone finally got around after the lean years before), but about the spirit and sense of freedom and optimism regarding the furure. She always tell us, what a good time (schöne Zeit) it had been. According to her the contrast to the filth and decadence of Germany today (of which she is thorougly disgusted) could not be any bigger.

http://www.thecivicplatform.com/2008/05/21/paradise-lost-1936-ns-color-film-berlin-in-the-year-of-the-olympic-games/#comments

I guess you never read such views in your conformist little history books written by the same people who fire-bombed our ancient cities, “re-educated” us into oblivion after the war in a climate of deliberately imposed starvation, and gave away 1/3 of our country to our enemies…while applauding and encouraging the ethnic murder and expulsion of 15 million Germans.

I really wish you’d leave Germans alone.

http://www.thecivicplatform.com/2008/08/11/guilt-surrounding-ww-ii-is-used-to-destroy-the-white-race/

***

Arn’t you the guy who said you didn’t give a fuck what happened to the Poles and that by implication they are subhuman scum?

The fact that I don’t care about them doesn’t mean “by implication” that they’re “subhuman scum,” it just means that I don’t care about them.

These are the same people who got a country in 1918 thanks to Germany and, as a thank you, proceeded to ethnically cleanse and oppress their German minority. In the interwar period, they piled stupid provocation upon stupid provocation upon stupid provocation (nobody has ever accused the Poles of being smart geopoliticians. These are the same people who got their country dismembered three times in history, 4 times if you count the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact). Going as far as shooting our customs officials and farmers in Danzig (95% + German city, National Socialist before the Reich, begging Hitler to be united with it). I won’t even mention what they did after the war to German civilians…starving and freezing women and children…with the happy acquiescence of the Allies.

Some sources:

Poland from the Inside.

http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/deathinpoland/dp00.html

Death in Poland
The Fate of the Ethnic Germans

http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/polandinside/pfi00.html

Poland and Germany

http://www.germancross.com/Poland/Poland&Germany;.htm

Polish Atrocities

Against the German Minority in Poland

http://www.jrbooksonline.com/polish_atrocities.htm

The Image of the Germans in Polish Literature

http://www.cwporter.com/image.htm

Hitler, for all his virtues, was, I’m afraid, in the final analysis, not a good man. Therefore, in my humble, sentiment riddled opinion, he was not fit to rule.

Who cares what a Yank thinks? What a Yank (or, let’s say, the Englishman Guessedworker) thinks of Adolf Hitler is completely immaterial. Adolf Hitler set out to make Germans and Germany great and powerful, that was his sole objective. That was his life’s obsession.

Germans Lay Siege to Rome

Alaric Lays Siege To Rome
The Lost Gold of Rome by Daniel Costa
ISBN 9780750943970; 2007

In October 408, Alaric approached the Eternal City for the first time and organised a cordon around it. He took over Portus and put an end to the flow of grain to the city. He began to starve Rome slowly, hoping that this kind of pressure was going to get him what he wanted. The Visigoths possessed neither the skills nor the technology to break through the brick walls.
Continue reading Germans Lay Siege to Rome…

Monument to a historical hoax targeted by freedom fighters in the Ukraine

GETTING NO RESPECT

Ukrainian Hoax monument targeted
Continue reading Monument to a historical hoax targeted by freedom fighters in the Ukraine…

American Racial History Timeline

Some very interesting and useful information put together by Fade.

1550

The term “negro” enters the English language from Spanish. (Jordan, 61)

Much more here.

The secular religion of “the Holocaust” is a second-rate product of the consumer society [FAURISSON]

Once again, I would like to thank Fred Scrooby for translating (French version here) Dr. Faurisson’s most recent communication on the instrumentalization of the Holocaust. The Jews have always had a knack for story-telling and for inventing self-serving myths and religions. One must stand in awe at their capacity for deception and self-deception.

Thank you, Fred!

Robert Faurisson, Aug. 7, 2008

The secular religion of “the Holocaust” is a second-rate product of the consumer society.

The “Holocaust” religion is secular: it is part of the lay world; it is profane; in practice it makes use of the secular arm, that is, of a temporal authority wielding formidable power. It has its dogma, its commandments, its decrees, its prophets, and its high priests, as well as (as one revisionist noted) its collection of saints, including, for example, St. Anne (Frank), St. Simon (Wiesenthal), and St. Elie (Wiesel). It has its holy sites, its rituals, and its pilgrimages. It has its sacred (macabre) buildings and its relics (in the form of bars of soap, shoes, toothbrushes, …). It has its martyrs, its heroes, its miracles and those upon whom its miracles have worked (in their millions), its Golden Legend, and its righteous. Auschwitz is its Golgotha. According to it, God is called Yahweh, protector of his Chosen People, who (as explained in Psalm 120 — invoked recently by public prosecutor Anne de Fontette during a legal action brought against a French revisionist) punishes “lying lips” (punishes, bear in mind, with “sharp arrows of the mighty, with coals of juniper”). In this religion Satan is called Hitler, condemned, like Jesus in the Talmud, to boil in excrement for eternity. This religion knows neither pity, nor forgiveness, nor mercy, only the obligation of vengeance. It amasses fortunes through blackmail and extortion, and obtains unheard-of privileges. It dictates its law to nations. Its beating heart is in Jerusalem at the Yad Vashem monument, in a country torn from the inhabitants; in the shelter of a great wall eight yards high dedicated to the protection of a people who are the salt of the earth, the “Holocaust” faithful impose on the goy a law which is the purest expression of militarism, racism, and colonialism.
Continue reading The secular religion of “the Holocaust” is a second-rate product of the consumer society [FAURISSON]…

Condamnation d’un jeune “négationniste”

Le site suisse “edicom.ch” reprend, le 11 août, une nouvelle parue la veille dans le “20 Minuten” (du 10 août, donc) selon laquelle un “néonazi” de 29 ans aurait été condamné pour discrimination raciale par la justice du canton de Uri:
Continue reading Condamnation d’un jeune “négationniste”…

Volksverhetzung: 72-Jähriger leugnet Holocaust

Die Staatsanwaltschaft Hannover ermittelt derzeit gegen einen 72-Jährigen wegen des Vorwurfs der Volksverhetzung. Der Bennigser soll per Post revisionistische Schriften verbreitet haben.

Guilt Surrounding W.W. II is Used to Destroy the White Race

I haven’t read such a brilliant essay, authored by Robert John, in years! Excellent! Simply excellent! It neatly encapsulates all the major questions regarding the biological survival of Whites, particularly Germans. Taken from The Occidental Quarterly, Vol. 7, No. 2, Summer 2007.

The War That Never Ends

Following World War II Germany was subjected to years of foreign military occupation, and programs of “re-education” with control of the media, in an environment of semi-starvation deliberately imposed by the Allied occupiers until about end of 1949 (a milder but still coercive occupation by American and Soviet forces continued for decades afterwards).9 Over a third of Germany’s pre–World War II territory was confiscated by the victors. The entire population of East Prussia, most of Pomerania and Silesia, and the Germans in Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Romania, and Yugoslavia were expelled, some 12 to 15 million people. “What ensued was the largest and most sweeping “ethnic cleansing” in history…About 2.1 million of these died from a combination of war, hunger, cold and disease” (Bell-Fialkoff 1993). Following the reunification of West and “East,” at 137, 826 square miles Germany’s territory is smaller than that of Montana.

The misery of the genocidal circumstances of the postwar endowed the small and self-serving charities of the Marshall Plan and other U.S. aid schemes with a key symptom of the Stockholm syndrome: “The captive believes his captors have shown compassion.”10 For over half a century the U.S. has been feted by German leaders as a heroic friend. German courts sentence, and an obedient media suppresses, dissident voices. A sense of collective guilt over the “Holocaust” is continually reinforced.11 Temporary “guest workers” in Germany, largely from Turkey, whose president urged them to have larger families, assumed the exalted status of “victims” of German ethnocentrism when their economic utility dwindled.

On September 3, 2000, German Chancellor Schroeder told a group representing millions of ethnic Germans who had been expelled from eastern Europe after World War II that he would continue the policy of not supporting their claims for compensation. “The federal government will not encumber its relations with these countries with political and legal questions that come from the past,” Schroeder told the Federation of Expellees at a ceremony marking the fiftieth anniversary of the signing of the group’s charter. “The former eastern territories belong to our cultural inheritance, but not to our country.” The expellees’ representative’s meek response was to hail Schroeder as the first “chancellor of our Fatherland” ever to address the group’s annual ceremony, and to assert that it was “good for Germany that their chapter of history not be ignored as embarrassing or shameful.” A miserly, but prized, recognition after half –a –century of neglect!

Schroeder’s refusal to support his fellow Germans may be compared with the alacrity with which he and other national leaders accede to pressure from Jewish groups to obtain monetary recompense for perceived losses stemming from “political and legal questions that come from the past.”

German subservience to the United States and its allies has begun to change, however. On September 12, 1999, the New York Times ran an article entitled “The Germans Want Their History Back,” by Roger Cohen, that began:

BUCHENWALD, Germany — The Buchenwald concentration camp, where the Nazis killed more than 65,000 people, later became one of the holy shrines of the East German Communist state. The camp was a statutory rite of passage for generations of schoolchildren, who learned here how the reactionary Hitler regime slaughtered socialists and Communists. This version of history was not true. From its establishment in 1937, Buchenwald served to incarcerate leftists, including the Communist leader Ernst Thälmann, who died here in 1944.

The German historian Ernst Nolte, who in 2000 received Konrad Adenauer prize for literature from the Deutschland Stiftung, a conservative foundation, was in the vanguard of change when he said, “We should leave behind the view that the opposite of National Socialist goals is always good and right.” In the plenary hall of the Bundestag, within the former Reichstag, on April 18, 2002, the federal chancellor presented a speech that he described as historic: It was the very first statement of the federal German government on family policy since World War II (and the discredited regime). The government intended to spend four billion euros on full-time childcare and to increase child benefits again.

In 2002 Günter Grass published Im Krebsgang (“Crab Walk”) (Göttingen: Steidl), an account of the torpedoing of the passenger ship Wilhelm Gustloff toward the end of World War II. On the bitter cold night of January 30, 1945, the former KdF (“Strength through Joy”) cruise liner, designed to carry a maximum of 1,865 people total, was transporting 10,582 refugees, soldiers, sailors, and crew—including scores of sick and injured, as well as women, children and the elderly—farther west in German. All were fleeing from the terrible fate that awaited many of those, Germans and non-Germans alike, in the path of the advancing Red Army. That night it was sunk by the Soviet sub S-13 and disappeared under the icy waters of the Baltic in less than fifty minutes, taking with it as many as 9,343 lives, the most tragic loss in marine history. But how many people knew that before Grass’s book appeared? On January 18, 2003, the New York Times published an article titled “The Germans Are Breaking an Old Taboo -Speaking about the Trauma of Carpet Bombing and Ruin after 50 years of Silence”; “Confronting Wartime Pain, Germans Are Breaking an Old Taboo,” “A Nation That Inflicted Suffering Is Healing Its Own.” Still occupied by American Armed Forces under the name of NATO, German chancellor Schroeder was able to say “No” to Anglo-American war against Iraq in 2003.

But severe limitations on oral and literary expression remain in place in Germany. Similar curbs have been adopted in other countries in the European Union, in a cultural climate of increasing fragmentation, or “diversity,” officially termed “cultural enrichment.” Discontent with the suppression of ethnocentrism in Europe since the World War II has been countered by legislation against its expression, thus denying its positive element. This repression of ethnopreference has been supported and psychologically reinforced by major media. And this repression has increasingly the force of law through coercive legislation.

The new Germany hopes to be viewed as a juridical concept, an enforcer of ‘human rights,’ and a collection of people who are doing penitence for the burden of 20th-century German history. Also reflecting this devaluation of one’s national past, the Commission on the Future of Multiethnic Britain, put in place by the British government, has gone beyond recommending that Britain be called a multi-ethnic, multi-faith society. The Commission strenuouslyurged the Parliament to shun further references to ‘British,’ because of its connotation to recent exclusivity and imperialism” (Gottfried).

As Winston Churchill sometimes said in his last years, according to his daughter Sarah, “What was it all for?” All that “blood and sweat,” but the survival of what Churchill called “the British race” is more uncertain than before the defeat of Nazi Germany.

Read the entire article here.

Endnotes:

9. On Feb 24, 1991, in an article in the New York Times Book Review, Stephen E. Ambrose, director of the Eisenhower Center at the University of New Orleans, announced that the Eisenhower Center had assembled an international committee of historians, “to get at the full truth.” The committee found Eisenhower not directly guilty of the starvation policy, finding instead that it was the London-based American-British-Soviet European Advisory Committee (EAC). Gen. Eisenhower was not responsible for the starvation program—it was the EAC. Thus, locus of responsibility was made the issue and Eisenhower seemingly cleared of responsibility for the starvation policy he implemented. Yet criminalizing responsibility for the implementation of “genocidal” policies was a feature of the 1945–1946 Allied tribunal at Nuremberg.

10. The Stockholm Syndrome takes its name from a 1973 bank robbery in Sweden in which four hostages were taken. Six days of captivity had a strange effect on the hostages’ mental health. They resisted their own release, raised money for their captors’ legal defense and refused to testify against them. Rumor has it that one woman hostage, or perhaps two, became romantically involved with the robbers after their ordeal.

The common explanation for this behavior is that it is a survival technique gone too far. The captive becomes so desperate to appease his captors, and therefore preserve his life, that he begins to identify and sympathize with them. He also feels gratitude toward his captors; they have the power of life and death over him and have been kind enough to allow him to live. The following four conditions contribute to the syndrome:

The captive has no hope of escape
The captors have control over whether the captive will live or die
The captive is isolated in such a way that the only perspective available to him is that of his captors
The captive believes his captors have shown compassion

Postwar American aid to Germany was a very small fraction of the value of German foreign assets confiscated, factories removed (mostly to the USSR), vessels of Germany’s considerable surface fleet and merchant marine seized, public buildings and shipbuilding facilities blown up (e.g. the Blohm and Voss shipyards in Hamburg), German technology, science, and related expertise appropriated, and German patents violated. German rocket scientists and their technology were transferred to America, an invaluable German investment that launched America’s space and cruise missile programs, through “Operation Paperclip” in 1945. Other Germans were put to the same use by the Soviets.

11. “West Berlin, May 6, 1990 (AP) Chancellor Helmut Kohl [who was fifteen when World War II ended], speaking at the opening of a conference of the World Jewish Congress here today, said the location and date of the conference gave it a ‘special meaning. “‘Never may it be forgotten that the genocide of the European Jews was prepared and directed by the National Socialists under the violent leadership from Berlin,’ Mr. Kohl said. Congress president Edgar M. Bronfman said a united Germany should teach about its Nazi past to avoid repeating ‘the lowest point ever reached in man’s inhumanity to man.’”

12. The European Union (EU) Council of Ministers agreed in March 1996 on a “Joint Plan of Action Against Racism and Xenophobia” that would cover a wide range of so-called ‘hate crimes.’ The Joint Plan, which followed statements on racism and xenophobia made at recent EU summits, provides a framework for addressing differences among criminal law systems within the EU regarding behavior categorized as racist and xenophobic. The EU, the Council of Ministers proclaimed, must recognize the need for international cooperation in order to prevent perpetrators of racist and xenophobic activities from exploiting the differences in laws by moving from one country to another. To that end, the EU states agreed that members who had not done so already would create laws that prohibit incitement, condoning crimes against humanity, dissemination of racist materials and participation in racist or xenophobic activities.

13. For a telling English-language account by the German government of this effort to brainwash German youth to accept non-European immigration, see: www.xenos-de.de/Xenos/Redaktion/Medien/Anlagen/Ergaenzende-Dokumente/german-program-xenos,property=pdf,bereich=xenos,sprache=de,rwb=true.pdf

Read the entire essay here.

Jewish Killers Celebrated in New Hollywood Movie

That’s dashed awkward - Polish Investigators Tie (Jewish) Partisans to Massacre. Partly addresses the Question that is Never Asked, Why Us?

Murderous Yankee-Judea: The Lies of Hiroshima Live On, Props in the War Crimes of the 20th Century

When I first went to Hiroshima in 1967, the shadow on the steps was still there. It was an almost perfect impression of a human being at ease: legs splayed, back bent, one hand by her side as she sat waiting for a bank to open. At a quarter past eight on the morning of August 6, 1945, she and her silhouette were burned into the granite. I stared at the shadow for an hour or more, then walked down to the river and met a man called Yukio, whose chest was still etched with the pattern of the shirt he was wearing when the atomic bomb was dropped.

U.S. Financial Aid to the Genocidal Hate-State of I$rael

More on Jewish hate and lies here.

Interview mit Otto Ernst Remer - Teil 01/19

More here.