Baldur von Schirach and the Hitler Youth Revolution

The huge success of the first national rally of the Hitler Youth held in Potsdam, on October 2 and 3, 1932, was not only a personal triumph for Baldur von Schirach but also a clarion call to arms for the movement and the party. Whereas the paid membership of the Hitlergugend1 had only been 20,000 in the beginning of the year, at Potsdam 100,000 youngsters swarmed over the heath outside this ancient Prussian city, transforming it into beehive of juvenile enthusiasm. Scores of workers from the SS and the SA had worked for hours preparing the grounds, erecting tents, and constructing a speaker’s platform and setting up a post office.2 Schirach and Karl Nabersberg, his assistant, worked hard to make this conclave an historic event in the National Socialist drive for power. A year later the Reichsjugendführer said: The press may write what it will concerning this day, it is nevertheless certain that National Socialism proved on October 2-3, 1932 that the Weimar government may have had the bayonets, but we had the youth.3

Read the article here:

schirach1.pdf

Ich hatt’ einen Kameraden

Paradise Lost [The Third Reich]

Wow! Just wow! The best video that I’ve seen in a while. Excellent work!

Professor dr. Goebbels hat das Wort

N.S. Germany - The Good Times

George Lincoln Rockwell - Speech

The secular religion of “the Holocaust” is a second-rate product of the consumer society [FAURISSON]

Once again, I would like to thank Fred Scrooby for translating (French version here) Dr. Faurisson’s most recent communication on the instrumentalization of the Holocaust. The Jews have always had a knack for story-telling and for inventing self-serving myths and religions. One must stand in awe at their capacity for deception and self-deception.

Thank you, Fred!

Robert Faurisson, Aug. 7, 2008

The secular religion of “the Holocaust” is a second-rate product of the consumer society.

The “Holocaust” religion is secular: it is part of the lay world; it is profane; in practice it makes use of the secular arm, that is, of a temporal authority wielding formidable power. It has its dogma, its commandments, its decrees, its prophets, and its high priests, as well as (as one revisionist noted) its collection of saints, including, for example, St. Anne (Frank), St. Simon (Wiesenthal), and St. Elie (Wiesel). It has its holy sites, its rituals, and its pilgrimages. It has its sacred (macabre) buildings and its relics (in the form of bars of soap, shoes, toothbrushes, …). It has its martyrs, its heroes, its miracles and those upon whom its miracles have worked (in their millions), its Golden Legend, and its righteous. Auschwitz is its Golgotha. According to it, God is called Yahweh, protector of his Chosen People, who (as explained in Psalm 120 — invoked recently by public prosecutor Anne de Fontette during a legal action brought against a French revisionist) punishes “lying lips” (punishes, bear in mind, with “sharp arrows of the mighty, with coals of juniper”). In this religion Satan is called Hitler, condemned, like Jesus in the Talmud, to boil in excrement for eternity. This religion knows neither pity, nor forgiveness, nor mercy, only the obligation of vengeance. It amasses fortunes through blackmail and extortion, and obtains unheard-of privileges. It dictates its law to nations. Its beating heart is in Jerusalem at the Yad Vashem monument, in a country torn from the inhabitants; in the shelter of a great wall eight yards high dedicated to the protection of a people who are the salt of the earth, the “Holocaust” faithful impose on the goy a law which is the purest expression of militarism, racism, and colonialism.
Continue reading The secular religion of “the Holocaust” is a second-rate product of the consumer society [FAURISSON]…

Third Reich Residential Architecture

This is a presentation of Third Reich era residential architecture - the houses of Reich era Germany. Many people have presented works by Speer, Troost, etc, I am doing something different. I have always had an interest in residential design. The houses featured here are typical Third Reich style - mostly typical middle class residences. Although traits of these designs are found in houses from before and after the Reich, this style has a 1930s association. These houses are finally being prized and renovated today…some Germans are not afraid of their past. The Nazis appreciated craftsmanship just as any German, and these houses have a high level of workmanship. So many today do not. “My house” is shown in the last two photos, a 1938 clinker-brick house in Berlin-Frohnau. These houses are the way things should look, this was to be a beautiful world, a sound aesthetic.

New Theory on Why Catholics Hate Nazis

Alex Linder: Occurred to me that yet another reason Catholics hate Nazis more than their real enemy, the jew, is that the Nazis made a mockery of their just-war theory by running a more moral war than any in Catholic history. By this I mean, the Nazis committed less rape, murder and mayhem than any army ever heard of, as far as I aware.

My comment:

Jean-Marie Le Pen’s Front National has had two wings: one wing composed of fundamentalist Catholics and another composed of so-called Pagans . The Pagan faction has always been far more anti-Semitic or anti-Jewish in outlook. I believe that it’s mostly due to the fact that so-called Pagans completely reject all sorts of worldviews or ideologies derived from, or based on, Judaism; and Catholicism has its spiritual roots in an ethnocentric, Jewish belief system. That’s a fact. It’s impossible to be fully, and without complexes, anti-Semitic while practicing Catholicism or being a confessing Christian. However, it should be noted that medieval, pre-Vatican II Catholicism regarded the Jews as essentially, metaphysically evil and Satanic, i.e. accurately. Those days are long gone, obviously. Now, the Church vigorously condemns all forms of racism and anti-Semitism.

June 10, 2005
Pope Tells Jews He Will Fight Anti-Semitism
By IAN FISHER
By The New York Times

ROME, June 9 - In his first major interfaith meeting, Pope Benedict XVI on Thursday assured a delegation of Jewish leaders of the Roman Catholic Church’s commitment to fighting anti-Semitism and to closer ties among Jews and Catholics.

“My predecessors, Pope Paul VI and, in a particular way, Pope John Paul II, took significant steps toward improving relations with the Jewish people,” he said in a meeting at the Vatican. “It is my intention to continue on this path.”

Several rabbis who attended the meeting said afterward that it would probably ease worries among some Jews about there being a German pope, and whether Benedict was as committed as John Paul II to continuing close ties.

“He said in effect we are almost in a special relationship,” said Rabbi Israel Singer, chairman of the World Jewish Congress. “It was something he wanted to underscore early.”

Source.

However, I will say this…all those Christians who want to remain Christian should consider Orthodoxy. Historically speaking, Orthodoxy has been the most anti-Jewish Christian Church around. Orthodoxy knows the Jew.

Like the bumper sticker says: “If you must drink and drive, drink Pepsi.”

Guilt Surrounding W.W. II is Used to Destroy the White Race

I haven’t read such a brilliant essay, authored by Robert John, in years! Excellent! Simply excellent! It neatly encapsulates all the major questions regarding the biological survival of Whites, particularly Germans. Taken from The Occidental Quarterly, Vol. 7, No. 2, Summer 2007.

The War That Never Ends

Following World War II Germany was subjected to years of foreign military occupation, and programs of “re-education” with control of the media, in an environment of semi-starvation deliberately imposed by the Allied occupiers until about end of 1949 (a milder but still coercive occupation by American and Soviet forces continued for decades afterwards).9 Over a third of Germany’s pre–World War II territory was confiscated by the victors. The entire population of East Prussia, most of Pomerania and Silesia, and the Germans in Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Romania, and Yugoslavia were expelled, some 12 to 15 million people. “What ensued was the largest and most sweeping “ethnic cleansing” in history…About 2.1 million of these died from a combination of war, hunger, cold and disease” (Bell-Fialkoff 1993). Following the reunification of West and “East,” at 137, 826 square miles Germany’s territory is smaller than that of Montana.

The misery of the genocidal circumstances of the postwar endowed the small and self-serving charities of the Marshall Plan and other U.S. aid schemes with a key symptom of the Stockholm syndrome: “The captive believes his captors have shown compassion.”10 For over half a century the U.S. has been feted by German leaders as a heroic friend. German courts sentence, and an obedient media suppresses, dissident voices. A sense of collective guilt over the “Holocaust” is continually reinforced.11 Temporary “guest workers” in Germany, largely from Turkey, whose president urged them to have larger families, assumed the exalted status of “victims” of German ethnocentrism when their economic utility dwindled.

On September 3, 2000, German Chancellor Schroeder told a group representing millions of ethnic Germans who had been expelled from eastern Europe after World War II that he would continue the policy of not supporting their claims for compensation. “The federal government will not encumber its relations with these countries with political and legal questions that come from the past,” Schroeder told the Federation of Expellees at a ceremony marking the fiftieth anniversary of the signing of the group’s charter. “The former eastern territories belong to our cultural inheritance, but not to our country.” The expellees’ representative’s meek response was to hail Schroeder as the first “chancellor of our Fatherland” ever to address the group’s annual ceremony, and to assert that it was “good for Germany that their chapter of history not be ignored as embarrassing or shameful.” A miserly, but prized, recognition after half –a –century of neglect!

Schroeder’s refusal to support his fellow Germans may be compared with the alacrity with which he and other national leaders accede to pressure from Jewish groups to obtain monetary recompense for perceived losses stemming from “political and legal questions that come from the past.”

German subservience to the United States and its allies has begun to change, however. On September 12, 1999, the New York Times ran an article entitled “The Germans Want Their History Back,” by Roger Cohen, that began:

BUCHENWALD, Germany — The Buchenwald concentration camp, where the Nazis killed more than 65,000 people, later became one of the holy shrines of the East German Communist state. The camp was a statutory rite of passage for generations of schoolchildren, who learned here how the reactionary Hitler regime slaughtered socialists and Communists. This version of history was not true. From its establishment in 1937, Buchenwald served to incarcerate leftists, including the Communist leader Ernst Thälmann, who died here in 1944.

The German historian Ernst Nolte, who in 2000 received Konrad Adenauer prize for literature from the Deutschland Stiftung, a conservative foundation, was in the vanguard of change when he said, “We should leave behind the view that the opposite of National Socialist goals is always good and right.” In the plenary hall of the Bundestag, within the former Reichstag, on April 18, 2002, the federal chancellor presented a speech that he described as historic: It was the very first statement of the federal German government on family policy since World War II (and the discredited regime). The government intended to spend four billion euros on full-time childcare and to increase child benefits again.

In 2002 Günter Grass published Im Krebsgang (“Crab Walk”) (Göttingen: Steidl), an account of the torpedoing of the passenger ship Wilhelm Gustloff toward the end of World War II. On the bitter cold night of January 30, 1945, the former KdF (“Strength through Joy”) cruise liner, designed to carry a maximum of 1,865 people total, was transporting 10,582 refugees, soldiers, sailors, and crew—including scores of sick and injured, as well as women, children and the elderly—farther west in German. All were fleeing from the terrible fate that awaited many of those, Germans and non-Germans alike, in the path of the advancing Red Army. That night it was sunk by the Soviet sub S-13 and disappeared under the icy waters of the Baltic in less than fifty minutes, taking with it as many as 9,343 lives, the most tragic loss in marine history. But how many people knew that before Grass’s book appeared? On January 18, 2003, the New York Times published an article titled “The Germans Are Breaking an Old Taboo -Speaking about the Trauma of Carpet Bombing and Ruin after 50 years of Silence”; “Confronting Wartime Pain, Germans Are Breaking an Old Taboo,” “A Nation That Inflicted Suffering Is Healing Its Own.” Still occupied by American Armed Forces under the name of NATO, German chancellor Schroeder was able to say “No” to Anglo-American war against Iraq in 2003.

But severe limitations on oral and literary expression remain in place in Germany. Similar curbs have been adopted in other countries in the European Union, in a cultural climate of increasing fragmentation, or “diversity,” officially termed “cultural enrichment.” Discontent with the suppression of ethnocentrism in Europe since the World War II has been countered by legislation against its expression, thus denying its positive element. This repression of ethnopreference has been supported and psychologically reinforced by major media. And this repression has increasingly the force of law through coercive legislation.

The new Germany hopes to be viewed as a juridical concept, an enforcer of ‘human rights,’ and a collection of people who are doing penitence for the burden of 20th-century German history. Also reflecting this devaluation of one’s national past, the Commission on the Future of Multiethnic Britain, put in place by the British government, has gone beyond recommending that Britain be called a multi-ethnic, multi-faith society. The Commission strenuouslyurged the Parliament to shun further references to ‘British,’ because of its connotation to recent exclusivity and imperialism” (Gottfried).

As Winston Churchill sometimes said in his last years, according to his daughter Sarah, “What was it all for?” All that “blood and sweat,” but the survival of what Churchill called “the British race” is more uncertain than before the defeat of Nazi Germany.

Read the entire article here.

Endnotes:

9. On Feb 24, 1991, in an article in the New York Times Book Review, Stephen E. Ambrose, director of the Eisenhower Center at the University of New Orleans, announced that the Eisenhower Center had assembled an international committee of historians, “to get at the full truth.” The committee found Eisenhower not directly guilty of the starvation policy, finding instead that it was the London-based American-British-Soviet European Advisory Committee (EAC). Gen. Eisenhower was not responsible for the starvation program—it was the EAC. Thus, locus of responsibility was made the issue and Eisenhower seemingly cleared of responsibility for the starvation policy he implemented. Yet criminalizing responsibility for the implementation of “genocidal” policies was a feature of the 1945–1946 Allied tribunal at Nuremberg.

10. The Stockholm Syndrome takes its name from a 1973 bank robbery in Sweden in which four hostages were taken. Six days of captivity had a strange effect on the hostages’ mental health. They resisted their own release, raised money for their captors’ legal defense and refused to testify against them. Rumor has it that one woman hostage, or perhaps two, became romantically involved with the robbers after their ordeal.

The common explanation for this behavior is that it is a survival technique gone too far. The captive becomes so desperate to appease his captors, and therefore preserve his life, that he begins to identify and sympathize with them. He also feels gratitude toward his captors; they have the power of life and death over him and have been kind enough to allow him to live. The following four conditions contribute to the syndrome:

The captive has no hope of escape
The captors have control over whether the captive will live or die
The captive is isolated in such a way that the only perspective available to him is that of his captors
The captive believes his captors have shown compassion

Postwar American aid to Germany was a very small fraction of the value of German foreign assets confiscated, factories removed (mostly to the USSR), vessels of Germany’s considerable surface fleet and merchant marine seized, public buildings and shipbuilding facilities blown up (e.g. the Blohm and Voss shipyards in Hamburg), German technology, science, and related expertise appropriated, and German patents violated. German rocket scientists and their technology were transferred to America, an invaluable German investment that launched America’s space and cruise missile programs, through “Operation Paperclip” in 1945. Other Germans were put to the same use by the Soviets.

11. “West Berlin, May 6, 1990 (AP) Chancellor Helmut Kohl [who was fifteen when World War II ended], speaking at the opening of a conference of the World Jewish Congress here today, said the location and date of the conference gave it a ‘special meaning. “‘Never may it be forgotten that the genocide of the European Jews was prepared and directed by the National Socialists under the violent leadership from Berlin,’ Mr. Kohl said. Congress president Edgar M. Bronfman said a united Germany should teach about its Nazi past to avoid repeating ‘the lowest point ever reached in man’s inhumanity to man.’”

12. The European Union (EU) Council of Ministers agreed in March 1996 on a “Joint Plan of Action Against Racism and Xenophobia” that would cover a wide range of so-called ‘hate crimes.’ The Joint Plan, which followed statements on racism and xenophobia made at recent EU summits, provides a framework for addressing differences among criminal law systems within the EU regarding behavior categorized as racist and xenophobic. The EU, the Council of Ministers proclaimed, must recognize the need for international cooperation in order to prevent perpetrators of racist and xenophobic activities from exploiting the differences in laws by moving from one country to another. To that end, the EU states agreed that members who had not done so already would create laws that prohibit incitement, condoning crimes against humanity, dissemination of racist materials and participation in racist or xenophobic activities.

13. For a telling English-language account by the German government of this effort to brainwash German youth to accept non-European immigration, see: www.xenos-de.de/Xenos/Redaktion/Medien/Anlagen/Ergaenzende-Dokumente/german-program-xenos,property=pdf,bereich=xenos,sprache=de,rwb=true.pdf

Read the entire essay here.

Interview mit Otto Ernst Remer - Teil 01/19

More here.

Separate Living Interviews Bill White

1) Tell us about yourself.

I was born in 1977 in Washington, DC and grew up in Montgomery County, Maryland. I had strong intellectual abilities but did not fit in well in school, where strong intellect is not always rewarded, and, misguided, channeled my rebellious energies into anarchism at a young age. As I grew older, and became exposed to better perspectives on the world, my nihilistic opposition to the system reversed itself, and I developed a National Socialist worldview.
Continue reading Separate Living Interviews Bill White…

The unrepresentative and anti-democratic EU

Adolf Hitler also had a European vision, but it was based on racial principles. Unfortunately, except perhaps for those outside of Europe itself, the European idea is now seen as little more than a geographic and/or commercial concept—although the former can hardly be said to apply in the case of Anatolian Turkey. The whole idea of current Euro-machinations is, of course, to produce a mongrel stew in the very primordial heartland of our race itself, all in a studied process of genocide. Within this context, such national labels as “British,” “French,” “German,” “Irish” and “Belgian,” et al., will gradually lose their particular meaning, as the citizens of those respective countries become more brown and black, as well as white—all equally pleasing in the sight of Jesus and the EU politicians. All of which brings us back to what Commander Rockwell understood a half century ago, when he wrote In Hoc Signo Vinces—namely, that at this late stage in history, national labels mean little when faced with the common threat of racial extinction. The only nationalism that counts for anything today is racial nationalism, based upon our primal identity, our core identity, as Aryans—i.e., as members of a greater ARYAN NATION, one without geographical boundaries, but with common ideals, common values, and a common vision of the future. In the existential emergency in which we find ourselves, this is the only body politic to which we can any longer owe our soul’s allegiance. I remain—

In His service, M. Koehl

German Military Marches - Horst Wessel Lied (Live)

Blood and Soil: Richard Walther Darré and Hitler’s ‘Green Party’

Our beloved, immortal Führer loved children and animals.

The German Nationalist Socialists were the original and genuine environmentalists.

Download book here:

bramwells-blood-and-soil.pdf

Paradise Lost: 1936 NS Color Film-Berlin in the Year of the Olympic Games

Whenever I watch footage from the Third Reich era I feel like crying. What a fantastic time it was! A time when Germany was happy, healthy, prosperous, clean, homogeneous, orderly, beautiful, and a powerhouse. A time when Germany’s government had real Germans at its helm and they had Germany’s best interests at heart. Simply by far the best years in German history! A magical time. I love everything about the Third Reich.

Esoteric National Socialism: Dalai Lama, Tibet, and NS Germany Collaboration

The Spiritual Foundations of the New Europe by Dr. Otto Dietrich

An excerpt:

The basic element in the political concept of National Socialism is that of the national state. It has no ambition to make imperial conquests, but strives after inner collectivity and national concentration. And the clear proof of this is the unprecedented organization by National Socialism of that tremendous return migration of racial Germans, the return of German blood to the Motherland.

The political conception of the national state is not directed towards a frittering away of power by outward expansion, but towards rational internal construction and the safeguarding of the national standard of existence. It has enforced the idea that relations between states can be made more permanent if the prospect of the nations is clear and determined and if leadership is responsibly and authoritatively rooted in the nation.

The organization of life in our present-day Germany reflects internal national and political determination and externally also shows definite lines of conduct. The ideas and the driving force of National Socialism are directed exclusively towards peace, as long as the indispensable bases of existence and security are guaranteed to our nation of 85 millions living within the heart of Europe. National Socialist Germany has been forced to fight, because the principles of imperialism and world domination of the Anglo-Saxons negate the simplest preliminary conditions for the development of our peace-loving nation. It was for this reason that they declared war on us. Britain is conducting a war of destructive force against constructive organization in the life of nations. The fact that National Socialist Germany has proved itself to be stronger than its aggressor in a war which has been forced upon it, is no proof of the violence of its principles, but only of the strength inherent in its ideal of order.

They say: “We are fighting for the democratic way of life. We are fighting for the liberty of living our lives as we wish.” But National Socialism has no intention of preventing them from doing so. It holds the opinion that every nation should live its own internal life in accordance with its own desires. The crimes they attribute to us are in reality committed by themselves. In no single country in the world does there exist such a great and disgusting intolerance of the mode of living of others as in the Anglo-Saxon countries. This intolerance is carried on hypocritically in the name of liberty, a liberty the real character of which I have already described.

Our adversaries maintain that this is a war of democracy against tyranny that makes it necessary either to unmask these political play-actors or else to open the eyes of their public to their true nature.

I may be allowed here to quote a neutral scholar, who a short while ago wrote an article “Hitler and the Democracies.” He asked the question why the Führer should be an opponent of the democracies, as he was one of the people himself and as president of the most democratic republic in the world was constantly in sincere and direct contact with the people. During his examination this scholar comes to the conclusion that only the modern democracies, France, Britain and America in particular, apparently had something in common with the will of the people. In reality it was only a pretext for party interests and the compensatory business of a few political circles among the upper classes. The mistakes of liberal democracy had already been made by its founders who had introduced into it their own material and utilitarian outlook and economic individualism. All this had been shamefully decorated by the founders of liberal democracy behind a facade of idealism. They themselves had never honestly believed in the catchwords of “Liberty,” “Equality” and “Fraternity,” which they had invented. In these so-called Western democracies, power was not actually upheld by the people, but a few thousand capitalists. The functioning of democracy merely concealed the selfishness of a small minority living in ease and comfort.

These statements hit the nail on the head. One should not always only talk of democracy, but for once answer the question: “What is ‘democracy‘? What does it actually mean?”

If democracy is no more than invisible domination by a few, achieved by means of money and the fabrication of public opinion, then our opponents are right in calling themselves democracies. But if democracy really denotes government by the people, then it is not they, but we, who are the democrats. We attach no particular value to decorating ourselves with this word that has become so compromised on account of its political past. But if the plutocrats make use of it to camouflage their domination and to deceive the people, then it is necessary to make its meaning perfectly clear. Whoever studies the conception of the National Socialist state in its innermost structure and practical functioning is bound to recognize that it is the most modern government of the people in history. It demonstrates the principles of responsibility and leadership in the truly national state, in opposition to the anonymous principles of degenerate democracy. It regards the will of the people not as a dead parliamentary majority to be gained by money or financial influence, but recognizes it continually in the permanent and direct alliance with the life of the people itself. The National Socialist Party is, therefore, not a party in the parliamentary sense, but simply and positively the party of the German nation. It is the great guardian of the social conscience of the nation, it holds its hand on the pulse of the people, it feels its slightest stirrings, its anxieties and its needs, its requirements and its desires, its pleasure and its pain. It is its helper and adviser and the unceasing bearer of its suggestions to the higher authorities. It has entrusted hundreds of thousands of citizens of all professions and classes with political responsibility, thereby providing tens of thousands of politically tested Germans with the opportunity of advancement to leading positions in the Reich. It has linked the perpetual stream of youth, organically and eternally, with the life of the nation and has created a system for the selection of leaders, which compels future generations to play their uninterrupted and vital part. Tangible shape is thereby given not to the will of a questionable parliamentary majority, but to the true will of the people. By its principles of training, efficiency and selection of leaders, it has given the nation a wonderfully functional system with the rhythm of strength continually renewing itself.

Nearly 2,500 years ago Plato wrote in his “Laws” that the most excellent constitution of a nation was that which was successful in persuading the masses to submit voluntary and in raising the most intelligent in their midst to leadership. The new principle of national and political leadership developed by the highly gifted leaders of Germany and Italy has made these sublime political concepts reality. When today the messiahs of democracy and the plutocrats talk contemptuously of “dictatorships,” their intellectual arrogance only conceals the stain of ignorance or the essence of hypocrisy which fears nothing so much as the realization of truth by the awakening of the nations.

Buy the little monograph here.

Read also The Führer and the German People.

With Hitler on the Road to Power (1934).

Die philosophischen Grundlagen des Nationalsozialismus “The Philosophical Foundations of National Socialism.”

A photograph to make a dog sick

That is how White women look and behave in structurelss, fatherless, promiscuous, feminist, anarchical, liberal, individualistic, democratic, permissive, capitalist, immoral, multicultural/mulitiracial, jew-controlled societies.

This is how White women look and behave in hierarchical, patriarchal, traditional, conservative, authoritarian, moral, structured, orderly, nationalist, socialist, collectivist, homogeneous, ethnocentric, jew-free societies.

WHAT DO YOU PREFER, WHITE MAN?

German Revolutionay Conservatism and National Socialism

It’s not completely clear in my mind what separated/separates German Revolutionary Conservatives from National Socialism, so I went to my university’s library and took out a stack of books on Revolutionary Conservatism and National Socialism. Since I don’t trust post-war Judeo-Saxon interpretations of pre-war Germany and Germans (or post-war, for that matter…I don’t trust them. Period.), I’m limiting myself to primary German sources. When I’m done, I’ll write a litte essay on both currents of thought.

And another thing…a few years ago I was watching a French intellectual being asked whether communism and National Socialism were essentially the same thing. He answered that they weren’t for two reasons: there’s a humanist aspect to communism that’s absent from National Socialism (so far so good, National Socialists weren’t humanists, they were particularists and not universalists like the communists, i.e. they wanted to advance the ethnic genetic interests of Germans and other Germanics (although as the war progressed, National Socialism became more pan-Europeans; for example, at first only the Germanic Flemish were to be members in good standing af a Greater Reich…however, eventually, the French-speaking Walloons were to be included as well…ditto for non-Germanic Croats (although Hitler thought that they were a Germanic tribe, etc., etc., etc.,)…to unite Europe based on racialist and anti-Semitic principles. The second point he made was that there’s an intellectual tradition in communism and none in National Socialism. This is, of course, false. National Socialism has deep philosophical roots in anti-Semitic, racialist, anti-egalitarian, anti-democratic (or, rather, anti-parliamentarian) European thought. Revolutionary Conservative writers such as Arthur Moeller van den Bruck (Hitler had a signed copy of the Third Reich in his personal library), Ernst Jünger, Oswald Spengler, Martin Heidegger, etc. were widely read in Völkisch circles. Further, one should keep in mind that the Third Reich only existed for 12 years (6 of them at war) and didn’t have the time and leisure to develop a well-defined school of thought. That being said, such authors and party functionaries as Joseph Goebbels or Alfred Rosenberg or Richard Walther Darré , among others, were important National Socialist thinkers. So to say that National Socialism is intellectually barren should be classified as one more anti-N.S., post-W.W.II lie. The list is long and grows longer every day. The West will never stop lying about and demonizing the Third Reich.