A mother abandons her baby, but is saved by a female dog

This is why I hate people and love animals as a matter of principle. Only Homo sapiens kill their own children in such unbelievable numbers (and call it abortion…because the baby is inconvenient right now), no other animals do that. On the contrary, they usually fight to the death to protect their offspring. If you don’t think that Homo sapiens are the most wicked, immoral, decadent satient beings on the planet…you haven’t been paying attention.
Continue reading A mother abandons her baby, but is saved by a female dog…

Our assault on class has led to the triumph of vulgarity

“I am no child of privilege, yet I mourn the passing of noble aspirations. In the place of nuanced ambition is naked greed”
Continue reading Our assault on class has led to the triumph of vulgarity…

Police recruits to receive special Holo indoctrination

GRADUATION REQUIREMENT
Police recruits to receive special Holo indoctrination New cops to visit Holocaust museum
By GLORIA CAMPISI
Philadelphia Daily News Friday, 11 July 2008
Continue reading Police recruits to receive special Holo indoctrination…

How an Emotion Became a Virtue – it took some help from Rousseau and Montesquieu

Compassion today is widely regarded as a good, and those who display it as good people. Indeed, many see compassion or some related virtue (e.g., empathy) as the core of goodness, as the virtue of virtues. It’s not only a private but also a public virtue, much cherished in our politicians. Even in international affairs, of all places, the apex of virtuous action is widely taken to be “humanitarian intervention” or the use of force to relieve suffering. Compassion has not always enjoyed so lofty and uncontroversial a status; will it someday once again relinquish it?

Prospect of gay Lutheran bishop divides Germans

The mainline Christian Churches in the West are a sick joke. All their churches should be turned into museums, condominiums, restaurants, libraries, cafés, movie theatres, etc. (i.e., something useful) and the remaining octogenarian sodomite clergy tarred and feathered and chased out on a rail. They should be told as final warning: “Take your abomination of a religion with you and don’t you ever come back, next time we won’t be so nice!” .

Students Fail — and Professor Loses Job [the lowering of standards in the corrupt West]

Who is to blame when students fail? If many students fail — a majority even — does that demonstrate faculty incompetence, or could it point to a problem with standards?

Women Harassing Men

I don’t think that there’s anything I hate more in the world than having a female boss, so far all the female supervisors that I’ve had were just horrible. Petty, moody, histrionic, neurotic, bitchy micromanagers. Just horrible. It’s another reason to despise modernity.

The relative newness of women in the corner office has lent an undeniable frisson to the corporate environment. Given how accustomed women are to drive-by comments and propositions, it can be thrilling when the tables turn and they’re the ones controlling the dynamic. Says a 35-year-old executive at a Massachusetts financial company, who has 37 men reporting directly to her: “There are days when I just think, You know, I could have any single one of these guys. Of course, in reality, I wouldn’t step over that line, but I know I could. And to be frank, that thought makes work far more interesting.” She admits to dressing for her male colleagues. And when hiring an assistant, damned if she didn’t choose the “totally hot” 25-year-old former professional hockey player. “If I have to look at this guy every day, why not have it be someone who makes me remember what a schoolgirl crush is?”

Modern, Post-War Architecture is Shit

Paris is a miraculous city in no small measure because modern architects have not been able to get their hands on it.

Blaming “Sex and the City” on promiscuous [jewish] homosexual writers

Former model Lauren Hutton attacked Sex and The City’s portrayal of promiscuous women and blamed “gay writers” for creating the stereotype that single women are “sluts” on the Today Show Thursday.

Lauren said, “It’s written by guys, who happen to be gay, who are sluts. That’s what I think. Let’s face it most men are sluts. That’s what testosterone is supposed to do. As a hunter, if you stayed alive after 30, nature wanted your genes out there. Women were just trying to get the best sperm to make a masterpiece. You have a bunch a guys who are sluts, writing for women and telling them they are supposed to act like this.”

The BRD erects monument to pedophiles [praises bestiality and S. & M.]

The diseased BRD…nothing and I mean nothing coming out of the morally squalid BRD surprises me. Is there some deviant, sickening, self-destructive behavior NOT celebrated by the Bastardstate? The Zionist, anti-German Bastardstate is a mortal threat to all healthy, true Germans (all three of them still alive).

BERLIN (Reuters) - Germany unveiled a monument to the tens of thousands of homosexuals persecuted under the Nazis, whose laws were used to prosecute gay men for a generation after World War Two.

Thoughts du jour on colonialism and slavery

One often hears in these days of White racial decline and decadence Whites apologize for colonialism and slavery (apologies made by people who had nothing to do with the alleged misdeeds, by the way…in my naiveté I thought that one could only apologize for things he or she had done…most reasonable people would agree that to expect from me that I apologize for what my great grandfather might have done would be insane, but we don’t live in a rational world insofar as White history is concerned), but let me ask the following fundamental question: why should Whites say that they are sorry for vanquishing and dominating other people and races? Why apologize for being smarter, stronger, better, more advanced, more virile, more manly, more energetic; in sum, SUPERIOR? Why is being vanquished, dominated, subjugated, overpowered, crushed, defeated, ruled a virtuous thing? In ancient times, the Greeks were happy to boast that they vanquished their enemies the Persians, and that therefore the Greek warrior must be superior to the Persian warrior. Like all healthy, strong races, they took pride in their victories and denigrated their erstwhile enemies! The Greeks wrote reams of poems celebrating their victories on the battlefield and their philosophers gave impassioned orations praising Greek superiority!

Both colonialism and slavery have been with us since time immemorial; for instance, the Arabs expanded from the 7th century to the 12th century from the Arabian Peninsula to rule the world! In the process, they enslaved those foreigners they vanquished (mostly sub-Saharan Africans of whom they had a very low opinion, but that’s for another post).

Moreover, I have even heard Dr. David Duke, a man for whom I have immense respect, say in an interview that Whites don’t want to dominate other races. In my view, this is a further indication or symptom of our racial decline, corruption, and weakness. A spokesman of a winning, dominating race doesn’t speak in such terms. In some ways, such talk is similar to today’s Roman Catholic Church apologizing for the Inquisitions and the Crusades. It’s just another sign of her institutional weakness. When the Roman Catholic Church was strong and powerful, she didn’t seek anyone’s forgiveness hat in hand! On the contrary, she proudly denied basic civic rights to her critics, waged ruthless wars against all internal dissidents, showed no mercy for outsiders, and was knee deep in the blood of her enemies.

Oh tempora, oh mores!

The State of Today’s “Germany”

Nothing of the sort every happened in the Third Reich when Germans had a real national government.

BERLIN (AFP) - German police said Sunday they have taken a seven month baby away from a couple in Bavaria who are under investigation after putting the child for sale on Internet auction site Ebay.

The mother said it was meant as a joke, but police failed to see the funny side, putting the baby into care and launching an investigation of both parents for attempted child trafficking, a statement said.

Disgusting lesbians win right to children without fathers [can someone please liberate us from the moral gutter that is the liberal West?]

Single women and lesbian couples won landmark parental rights last night as MPs voted to remove the requirement that fertility clinics consider a child’s need for a father.

See also Fathers aren’t needed say MPs: Commons decides IVF babies can do without a male role model.

A photograph to make a dog sick

That is how White women look and behave in structurelss, fatherless, promiscuous, feminist, anarchical, liberal, individualistic, democratic, permissive, capitalist, immoral, multicultural/mulitiracial, jew-controlled societies.

This is how White women look and behave in hierarchical, patriarchal, traditional, conservative, authoritarian, moral, structured, orderly, nationalist, socialist, collectivist, homogeneous, ethnocentric, jew-free societies.

WHAT DO YOU PREFER, WHITE MAN?

Diseased Jewess Denies that her Art Project is Fiction [Jews are not normal people!]

What did Hitler think of jewish “art,” again? Can someone please point out where Hitler was wrong about the jews?

Fucked up Jewess (Jews, like women, tend to be masochistic and neurotic…now, imagine a what a Jewess must be like) has spoken to the Yale Daily News and is denying claims from her own University that her self-induced miscarriages as an art piece is an elaborate prank.

Here are some of the LOWlights from her rebuttal:

- Shvarts stood by her project, calling the University’s statement “ultimately inaccurate.”

- But Shvarts reiterated Thursday that she repeatedly used a needleless syringe to insert semen into herself. At the end of her menstrual cycle, she took abortifacient herbs to induce bleeding, she said. She said she does not know whether or not she was ever pregnant.

- “No one can say with 100-percent certainty that anything in the piece did or did not happen,” Shvarts said, “because the nature of the piece is that it did not consist of certainties.”

- Shvarts showed the News footage from tapes she plans to play at the exhibit. The tapes depict Shvarts — sometimes naked, sometimes clothed — alone in a shower stall bleeding into a cup.

Source.

“For the past year, I performed repeated self-induced miscarriages. I created a group of fabricators from volunteers who submitted to periodic STD screenings and agreed to their complete and permanent anonymity. From the 9th to the 15th day of my menstrual cycle, the fabricators would provide me with sperm samples, which I used to privately self-inseminate. Using a needleless syringe, I would inject the sperm near my cervix within 30 minutes of its collection, so as to insure the possibility of fertilization. On the 28th day of my cycle, I would ingest an abortifacient, after which I would experience cramps and heavy bleeding.

To protect myself and others, only I know the number of fabricators who participated, the frequency and accuracy with which I inseminated and the specific abortifacient I used. Because of these measures of privacy, the piece exists only in its telling. This telling can take textual, visual, spatial, temporal and performative forms — copies of copies of which there is no original.

This piece — in its textual and sculptural forms — is meant to call into question the relationship between form and function as they converge on the body. The artwork exists as the verbal narrative you see above, as an installation that will take place in Green Hall, as a time-based performance, as a independent concept, as a myth and as a public discourse.

It creates an ambiguity that isolates the locus of ontology to an act of readership. An intentional ambiguity pervades both the act and the objects I produced in relation to it. The performance exists only as I chose to represent it. For me, the most poignant aspect of this representation — the part most meaningful in terms of its political agenda (and, incidentally, the aspect that has not been discussed thus far) — is the impossibility of accurately identifying the resulting blood. Because the miscarriages coincide with the expected date of menstruation (the 28th day of my cycle), it remains ambiguous whether the there was ever a fertilized ovum or not. The reality of the pregnancy, both for myself and for the audience, is a matter of reading.

This ambivalence makes obvious how the act of identification or naming — the act of ascribing a word to something physical — is at its heart an ideological act, an act that literally has the power to construct bodies. In a sense, the act of conception occurs when the viewer assigns the term “miscarriage” or “period” to that blood.

In some sense, neither term is exactly accurate or inaccurate; the ambiguity is not merely a matter of context, but is embodied in the physicality of the object. This central ambiguity defies a clear definition of the act. The reality of miscarriage is very much a linguistic and political reality, an act of reading constructed by an act of naming — an authorial act.

It is the intention of this piece to destabilize the locus of that authorial act, and in doing so, reclaim it from the heteronormative structures that seek to naturalize it.

As an intervention into our normative understanding of “the real” and its accompanying politics of convention, this performance piece has numerous conceptual goals. The first is to assert that often, normative understandings of biological function are a mythology imposed on form. It is this mythology that creates the sexist, racist, ableist, nationalist and homophobic perspective, distinguishing what body parts are “meant” to do from their physical capability. The myth that a certain set of functions are “natural” (while all the other potential functions are “unnatural”) undermines that sense of capability, confining lifestyle choices to the bounds of normatively defined narratives.

Just as it is a myth that women are “meant” to be feminine and men masculine, that penises and vaginas are “meant” for penetrative heterosexual sex (or that mouths, anuses, breasts, feet or leather, silicone, vinyl, rubber, or metal implements are not “meant” for sex at all), it is a myth that ovaries and a uterus are “meant” to birth a child.

When considering my own bodily form, I recognize its potential as extending beyond its ability to participate in a normative function. While my organs are capable of engaging with the narrative of reproduction — the time-based linkage of discrete events from conception to birth — the realm of capability extends beyond the bounds of that specific narrative chain. These organs can do other things, can have other purposes, and it is the prerogative of every individual to acknowledge and explore this wide realm of capability.”

Source and source.

Jewess Inseminates Herself, Tapes Miscarriages For Art Project (TJB)

Jewish Art.

Just when you think that you’ve heard it all insofar as sociopathic Jewish behavior goes, something else comes along that leaves one in total awe at the extent of Jewish wickedness and depravity. To call Jews a Satanic race would be offensive to Satan.

Children Assaulted by Sex, Violence, Drugs and Explicit Language on BET and MTV

Turn off your t.v., White man! Or, better yet, throw it out! You sure don’t need Jews to tell you how to think and act 3 hours a day!

Today’s Woman: Cruel, Sadistic, Brutal

See video here.

The decline of the Western World

It started with the Versailles Treaty, which was promoted by FDR (Roosevelt) to bring WW II into motion to reduce the Aryan Race to a just 10 % minority of the World, who has no protection from their leaders, because they use them in competition to secure their Judaic-Jesuit- Christian- Capitalist aims! Read it on: http://www.vho. org/GB/Journals/ JHR/4/2/Weber135 -172.html
Continue reading The decline of the Western World…

Why Should Normal White Americans Resent Jews?

How Jews Undermined White America by Using Niggers. Why were New York Jews Shoving Integration Down the Throats of Southern Whites, Ask yourself that Question, White Man!

Levison, Stanley David (1912-1979)

In 1956, Stanley Levison, a Jewish attorney from New York, began raising funds to support the Montgomery bus boycott and became acquainted with Martin Luther King, Jr. The two men developed a close relationship in which Levison not only advised King, but also aided him with the day-to-day administrative demands of the movement. In 1963, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) used King’s relationship with Levison, who they believed to be a Communist functionary, to justify surveillance of King.

Born in New York City on 2 May 1912, Levison studied at the University of Michigan, Columbia University, and the New School for Social Research before earning two law degrees from St. John’s University. As treasurer of the Manhattan branch of the American Jewish Congress, Levison became a champion of left-wing causes, and supported the defense of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg and the campaign against the McCarran Internal Security Act. In the early 1950sthe FBI considered Levison to be a major financial coordinator for the Communist Party in the United States and began to monitor his activities.

In the mid-1950s Levison turned his attention to the civil rights struggle. In 1956,Levinson, Bayard Rustin, and Ella Baker created In Friendship, an organization that raised money for southern civil rights activists and organizations, including the Montgomery Improvement Association (MIA). Together they formulated the concept of a regional “congress of organizations” dedicated to mass action grounded in nonviolence, an idea that would later develop into the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) (Papers 4:491).

Throughout King’s career, Levison drafted articles and speeches for him, prepared King’s tax returns, and raised funds for SCLC. In 1958 Levison helped King edit Stride Toward Freedom and secured a book contract with Harper & Brothers. In almost all instances, he performed these services without compensation. When King offered payment, Levison refused. “My skills,” he wrote King, “were acquired not only in a cloistered academic environment, but also in the commercial jungle. . . . I looked forward to the time when I could use these skills not for myself but for socially constructive ends. The liberation struggle is the most positive and rewarding area of work anyone could experience” (Papers 5:103).

The FBI’s interest in Levison was suddenly rekindled in early 1959, when the bureau learned of Levison’s connection with King and the movement. FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover believed that Levison was a Communist agent, and that through Levinson, international communism influenced King’s actions. He brought this concern to the attention of Attorney General Robert Kennedy, and Harris Wofford was enlisted by the Kennedy administration to warn King to end his relationship with Levison. Unwilling to lose a trusted advisor because of vague allegations, King refused to act on the administration’s request for over a year. In March 1962 Robert Kennedy authorized the FBI to begin electronic surveillance of Levison, including his contact with King.

Just before a 22 June 1963 White House meeting with civil rights leaders, Burke Marshall and Robert Kennedy separately repeated the warning to King, and this time included a recommendation to also fire Jack O’Dell. King demurred and requested proof of Levison’s threat to national security. After the meeting President John F. Kennedy took King aside and repeated the request that he ban Levison and O’Dell directly.

Over the next months King debated how to handle the requests to cease contact with Levsion. Levison, however, valued the administration’s support for the movement and took the initiative to cut off all visible ties with King. He continued to advise King on important matters indirectly, often using Clarence Jones as an intermediary. In October 1963, evidence of the ongoing relationship helped convince Robert Kennedy to approve wiretaps in King’s home and office.

Throughout the 1960s, Levison continued to lend King practical and moral support. Following the Selma to Montgomery march in March in 1965, Levison wrote King: “For the first time whites and Negroes from all over the nation physically joined the struggle in a pilgrimage to the deep south.” For Levison, Selma was a turning point in King’s status as a leader: “[it] made you one of the most powerful figures in the country—a leader now not merely of Negroes, but of millions of whites” (Levison, 7 April 1965).

In early 1967, when King became determined to participate in a public denunciation of the Vietnam War organized by Clergy and Laymen Concerned about Vietnam, Levison counseled him to refrain. Levison felt that King’s planned speech, “Beyond Vietnam,” was unbalanced and would have disastrous consequences to SCLC’s fundraising campaign and King’s personal prestige

A year after publicly speaking out against the Vietnam War, King was assassinated in Memphis, Tennessee. Andrew Young, another of King’s trusted advisors, called Levison a few hours afterward to tell him the news. Young wrote in his autobiography, “Martin had confided in Stan his worries and doubts and hopes ever since Montgomery and had defied the FBI and the president of the United States for their friendship. I knew he… would want to hear from one of us personally” (Young, 467).

After a long battle with diabetes and cancer, Levison died at his home in New York City in 1979. Upon hearing of his death, Coretta Scott King called him “one of my husband’s loyal and supportive friends” whose “contributions to the labor, civil rights, and peace movements,” are relatively known (“Civil Rights Strategist”).

Source.