I didn’t know that…
November 5, 2003 COPENHAGEN, Denmark — Home to the Vikings of yore, Denmark said Wednesday it will let a group that worships Thor, Odin and other Norse gods conduct legally-recognized marriages.
Continue reading ‘Denmark Accepts Norse God Marriages’

by Shawn K. Stover
More than a decade ago, Stephen Jay Gould wrote of science and religion as “non-overlapping magisteria,” or “NOMA.”1 He saw no conflict between science and religion, because he saw no overlap between their respective domains of professional expertise. According to Gould, science deals with the “empirical constitution of the universe,” while religion encompasses the search for ethical values and spiritual meaning.
Continue reading ‘The Great Divide: How to Resolve the War between Science & Religion’
‘The Supernatural and Natural Selection: Religion and Evolutionary Success’ by Lyle B. Steadman and Craig T. Palmer
‘A fundamentally new approach to religion that differs from all other
explanations by defining religion not in terms of unidentifiable beliefs
in the supernatural, but by the identifiable behavior of communicating
acceptance of supernatural claims. This approach distinguishes different
forms of religious behavior, from the ancestor worship, totemism, and
shamanism of traditional societies, to the behavior of prophets that
started the world religions, by their different supernatural claims.
Communicating acceptance of any supernatural claim tends to promote
cooperative social relationships because it communicates a willingness
to accept unskeptically the influence of the speaker in a way similar to
a child’s acceptance of the influence of a parent. This is why the
clearest identifiable effect of religious behavior is the promotion of
cooperative family-like social relationships: parent/child- like
relationships between the individuals making and accepting the
supernatural claims and sibling-like relationships among coacceptors of
those claims. As religious behaviors, and the increased cooperation they
produce, are copied from one generation to the next, the number of
cooperating codescendants has tended to increase. Thus, religion can be
seen as a descendant-leaving strategy of our ancestors that has been
favored by natural selection and has become a human universal found in
all known cultures.’
Source.
Humanity cannot stand too much reality…see also Most believe in angels.
Charles Darwin to receive apology from the Church of England for rejecting evolution. [Oooops! We were wrong!]
A Muslim has been convicted of child cruelty over a religious ritual. Should a secular state interfere in such practices?
A.C. Grayling
Continue reading ‘Religion and its mortifying history of self-inflicted pain’
by Mark Perakh
In 1996 a professor of biochemistry at Lehigh University named Michael Behe published Darwin’s Black Box1, in which he presented his concept of “irreducible complexity” (IC). Behe and his Intelligent Design (ID) colleagues claim that IC is strong evidence of “design” of biological systems, and ever since his book IC has acquired the status of one of the main pillars of the Intelligent Design platform.
Continue reading ‘Flagella Myths’
Recent Comments